The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

680 protocols using analyst 1

1

mRNA m6A Quantification by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bulk mRNA m6A modification quantification through LC-MS/MS was conducted by Wuhan Metware Co., Ltd. Briefly, 1 μg purified mRNA was sufficiently digested to nucleosides with S1 nuclease, phosphodiesterase, and alkaline phosphatase in 37 °C, then extracted by chloroform to get prepared solution samples. The samples were analyzed using a UPLC-ESI-MS/MS system (UPLC, ExionLCTM AD, https://sciex.com.cn/; MS, Applied Biosystems 6500 Triple Quadrupole, https://sciex.com.cn/). The effluent was alternatively connected to an ESI-triple quadrupole-linear ion trap (QTRAP)-MS. Linear ion trap (LIT) and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were acquired on a triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometer (QTRAP) equipped with an ESI Turbo Ion-Spray interface, then operated in a positive ion mode and controlled by Analyst 1.6.3 software (Sciex). RNA modifications were analyzed using scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Data acquisitions were performed using Analyst 1.6.3 software (Sciex). RNA modification contents were detected by MetWare (http://www.metware.cn/) based on the AB Sciex QTRAP 6500 LC-MS/MS platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized MRM Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Linear ion trap and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were acquired using a triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometer (QTRAP), QTRAP® 6,500+ LC–MS/MS System, equipped with an ESI Turbo IonSpray interface, operating in both positive and negative ion modes, and controlled by Analyst 1.6.3 software (Sciex). The ESI source operation parameters were as follows: ion source, ESI+/−; source temperature 550°C; ion spray voltage, 5,500 V (positive), and-4500 V (negative); curtain gas was set at 35 psi. Metabolites were analyzed using scheduled MRM. Data acquisition was performed using Analyst 1.6.3 software (Sciex). Multiquant 3.0.3 software (Sciex) was used to quantify all metabolites. Mass spectrometry parameters, including the declustering potentials (DP) and collision energies (CE) for individual MRM transitions, were done with further DP and CE optimization. A specific set of MRM transitions was monitored for each period according to the metabolites eluted within the corresponding period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Flavonoid Analysis by QTRAP LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Linear ion trap (LIT) and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were obtained using a triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometer (QTRAP; API 6500 Q TRAP LC/MS/MS System) equipped with an ESI Turbo Ion-Spray interface, operated in the positive and negative ion modes and controlled using Analyst 1.6.3 software (Sciex, Toronto, Canada). The ESI source operation parameters were set according to those reported by Wang et al. (2022) (link). Flavonoid data were collected and identified by scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM, New York, NW, USA). Data acquisition was performed using Analyst 1.6.3 software (Sciex, Toronto, Canada) according to Wang et al. (2022) (link). MultiQuant 3.0.3 software (Sciex, Toronto, Canada) was used to quantify all metabolites. The mass spectrometer parameters, including depolymerization potential (DP) and collision energy (CE), for individual MRM transitions were performed with further DP and CE optimization (Liang et al., 2022 (link); Wang et al., 2022 (link)). A specific set of MRM transitions was monitored during each period based on the metabolites eluted during each period (Liang et al., 2022 (link)). Flavonoid contents were detected using MetWare (https://www.metware.cn/) based on the AB Sciex QTRAP 6500 LC‒MS/MS platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Anthocyanin Profiling via LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Linear ion trap (LIT) and triple quadrupole (QQQ) scans were obtained using a triple quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometer, the AB Scoex Qtrap® 6500+ LC-MS/MS System (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA), equipped with an ESI Turbo Ion-Spray interface. The instrument operated in positive ion mode and was controlled by Analyst 1.6.3 software (Sciex). The ESI source operated with the following parameters: Ion Source: ESI+, Source Temperature: 550 °C, Ion Spray Voltage (IS): 5500 V, Curtain Gas (CUR): Set at 35 psi. Anthocyanins were subjected to analysis using scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). Data acquisition was conducted through Analyst 1.6.3 software (Sciex). Quantification of all metabolites was performed using Multiquant 3.0.3 software (Sciex). Further optimization of declustering potentials (DP) and collision energies (CE) for individual MRM transitions was carried out. A specific set of MRM transitions was monitored for each period, corresponding to the elution of metabolites during that timeframe.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AB Sciex 3200: HPLC-ESI–MS/MS was conducted on a Shimadzu (Columbia, MD) HPLC system composed of two LC-20AD pumps with a CTO-20A column oven, DGU-20A3 degasser, FCV-11AL solvent selection valve, and CBM 20A controller connected to a MPS 3C temperature regulated autosampler equipped with an active wash station (Gerstal, Linthicum, MD) all interfaced with an API Sciex 3200 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex, Foster City, CA). Analyst 1.4.2 software (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA) was utilized for instrument control, data acquisition, and analyte mass spectrometric parameter optimization.
AB Sciex 4000: LC/MS–MS analysis was performed on a Shimadzu HPLC system composed of two LC-20AD XR pumps, DGU20A3 degasser, CTO-20A column oven, FCV-11AL solvent selection valve, SIL-20AC XR temperature regulated autosampler, and an external Valco divert valve installed between the LC and mass spectrometer. The LC system was coupled to an API 4000 linear ion trap triple quadrupole (QTRAP) tandem mass spectrometer operated with Analyst 1.5.2.
Multiquant 3.0.1 (AB Sciex) was utilized for peak integration, generation of calibration curves, and data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Targeted Metabolite Profiling by FIA/MRM-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracted metabolites were analyzed by FIA/MRM-MS using a Shimadzu Nexera XR UHPLC interfaced with a Sciex QTrap 6500+ mass spectrometer controlled by Analyst 1.7 (Sciex) software. Samples for reversed phase chromatography were separated using an Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB C18 Solvent Saver Plus column (3.0 × 100 mm 3.5 micron) equipped with a SecurityGuard cartridge-based guard column (Phenomenex). The PITC-derivatized biogenic amines and amino acids were analyzed in the positive ion mode using a 10-min gradient, the 3-nitrophenylhydrazine–derivatized organic acids were analyzed in the negative ion mode using a 20-min gradient, and PITC-derivatized lipids and acylcarnitines were analyzed by FIA in both positive and negative ion modes from separate injections using a 3-min MRM-MS method (42 ). Specific LC and FIA/MRM-MS conditions including gradient and MS source parameters and MRM transitions can be found in supplemental Tables S2 and S3. Data analysis and quantitation was performed using MultiQuant 3.0.3 (Sciex) and Analyst 1.6.2 (Sciex).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasma Amino Acid Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of 10 μL plasma were prepared using derivatization as previously reported [11 ]. For internal standardization, a labeled amino acid standards set (set A, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) was mixed with L-Asparagine (15N2, 98%, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) and L-Tryptophan (Indole-D5, 98%, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) and added to the precipitation reagent. AA butylester were determined by ion-pair liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry detection (LC-MS/MS). 10 μL of the prepared sample were injected into the HPLC system (HPLC 1100, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) and chromatographic separation was performed with a XBridge C18 column (Waters GmbH, Eschborn, Germany). MS detection was performed with an API 2000 triple quadrupole instrument (Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany) with an APCI source operating in positive ion ionization mode. Data acquisition on the mass spectrometer was controlled by Analyst 1.6.2 software (AB Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany). Data handling and quantification were also performed with Analyst 1.6.2 software (AB Sciex, Darmstadt, Germany). The sums of non-essential and essential AA were computed in addition to the sum of the branched chain AA (BCAA) leucine, isoleucine and valine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analysis of Phytohormones and Sugars in Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phytohormones and sugars were analyzed from 10 mg freeze-dried, ground leaf material of the photosynthesis experiment (n = 6). Phytohormone analysis was carried out on an LC/MS/MS system as previously described (Eberl et al., 2018 (link)). Data were processed using ANALYST 1.5.2 (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, United States) and hormones were quantified relative to the peak area of their corresponding standard (D4-salicylic acid and D6-abscisic acid; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, United States). For sugar analysis, extracts were diluted 1:10 with water prior to analysis on an Agilent 1200 HPLC system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, United States) coupled to an API 3200 tandem mass spectrometer (AB Sciex). The analytes were separated on an hydrophobic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)-column (apHera NH2 Polymer; 15 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, United States) with a water/acetonitrile gradient (flow, 1.0 ml min-1), for more details see Madsen et al. (2015) (link). The data were processed using ANALYST 1.5.2 (AB Sciex) and the compounds were quantified using an external standard curve. For this, a mixture of glucose, fructose and sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) was analyzed at six different concentrations ranging from 20 to 1.25 μg ml-1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative UPLC-MS/MS analysis of amino acids and tryptophan metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UPLC-MS/MS system consisted of an Agilent 1290 UPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a QTrap 5500 tandem mass spectrometer (AB Sciex, Toronto, ON, Canada). The instrument equipped with electrospray ionization (ESI) source and operated using Analyst 1.5.2 software (AB Sciex, Toronto, ON, Canada). Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) and positive ion mode were used for detection (Tables S4 and S5). A Phenomenex EZfaast C18 column (250 mm × 2.0 mm, 4 μm) and a Waters Atlantis T3 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 3 μm) were adopted to determine amino acids and tryptophan metabolites separately with mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water, v/v) and B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile, v/v). The gradient was shown in Tables S6 and S7. The sample preparation and detection method were adopted according to the previous study [45 ,46 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Branched Chain SCFAs via LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An LC-MS/MS system that was equipped with a 1290 HPLC instrument (Agilent Technologies, Glostrup, Denmark), a QTRAP 5500 (ABSciex, Framingham, MA, USA), and a reversed-phase column (Pursuit 5 C18 150 × 2.0 mm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) was employed. MS was conducted in positive ion mode with a turbo ion-spray voltage of 5500 V, while using 20 psi curtain gas, 50 psi nebulizer gas, and 50 psi drying gas at a temperature of 400 °C. The sample injection volume was 3 µL. LC separation was performed while using mobile phase A (0.1 % formic acid in water) and mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile), at a flow rate of 500 µL/min and a temperature of 40 °C. The separation gradient was as follows: 30% B at 0 min., 30 to 50% B in 30 min., 50 to 30% B in 0.1 min., and 30% B in 4.9 min. A collision energy of 15 V was used for multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), and LC-MS/MS data were analyzed by Analyst 1.5.2 software (AB Sciex). Peak area of each isotope-labeled internal standard was used to normalize that of straight or branched SCFA having the same number of carbons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!