The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

55 protocols using gracey curette

1

Doxy Hyc Mucoadhesive Film for Periodontal Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In both test groups, mechanical debridement of the periodontal pockets was performed using a 1/2 Gracey curette (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA). Additionally, in test group 1, the Doxy Hyc mucoadhesive buccal film was applied three times, at three days intervals. The buccal film was dosed by measuring trapeze-shaped samples of similar size: 10 mm width and 5 mm height. The tooth mobility and gingival index were evaluated before each application of the Doxy Hyc mucoadhesive buccal film.
The treatment efficacy was evaluated after 28 days after the first treatment administration. The subjects were then euthanised by administration of an overdose of anesthetic and the tissue specimens were collected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Periodontal Pocket Treatment with Biomaterial Insertion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ligatures were removed after 14 days, and the treatments were applied. The mechanical debridement in groups T1 and T2, consisting in the removal of plaque, calculus, and necrotic cementum from the periodontal pockets, was performed using a 1/2 Gracey curette (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA), modified by sharpening with a dedicated device (Sidekick Sharpener, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) in order to reduce the size of the active part. After the mechanical instrumentation, the biomaterial samples were inserted in the periodontal pockets of the subjects in group T1. No sample of the material containing antibiotics was applied to group T2. The treatment was performed under 6×, 10× and 25× magnification, using a medical microscope (Leica M320, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany).
After application, the periodontal pocket was sealed with a mucoadhesive buccal film, which was spread over the electrospun fibers; the adhesion of the film to the gingival mucosa was optimised by prior hydration with sterile saline solution and, after application, it was maintained due to the contact with saliva.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Identification of Periodontal Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collection of plaque samples was done from patients with inflammation in periodontal cells. The plaque samples were collected from patients diagnosed as generalized periodontitis stage III grade B. The diagnosis was based on the distribution and severity of periodontal attachment loss in relation to teeth present in the oral cavity [23 (link)]. Plaque samples were accumulated by infusing Gracey-curette (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA). The plaque samples were collected as the curette touched the base of the periodontitis region without any damage to adjacent tissues. The plaque samples were moved to an anaerobic transport media, Sodium thioglycolate (Sigma-Aldrich, Dermstadt, Germany).
Selective media was used for the isolation of P. gingivalis, T. denticola, A. actinomycetemcomitans, and T. forsythia [24 (link)], incubated anaerobically with nitrogen content of 80%, hydrogen content 10%, and carbon dioxide content 10% for a period of 3 to 7 days at a temperature of 37 °C. Further, the growth of the desired bacteria on the particular media was recognized based on morphology of the colony, and species identification was done by biochemical tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Signatures of Periodontal Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD was defined as PPD ≥ 5 mm in ≥10 teeth, and BOP in ≥30% of sites. Periodontally healthy controls had PPD ≤ 4 mm and BOP in ≤30% sites. Periodontal assessment was carried out by two calibrated examiners (M.S.R. and A.M.F). RNA isolated from PanDCs and PBMCs then qrt-PCR was performed to detect molecular microbial signatures in each population. In addition, quantifications of Sg, Fn and Pg were carried out in the oral biofilm of healthy and PD patients. For each subject, subgingival biofilm samples were collected from the four deepest sites (one site per quadrant) that did not exhibit suppuration as observed by prior clinical examination. Before sampling, the teeth were isolated with cotton rolls and the supragingival plaque was removed. A mini-five Gracey curette (Hu-Friedy®, Chicago, IL, USA), was gently inserted into the pocket in the most apical portion and the subgingival biofilm was collected with a single stroke. The samples were placed in polypropylene tubes with 1.5 ml of a solution containing 100 ml buffer solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.6) and stored at −80 °C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Periodontal Biomarker Collection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crevicular fluid and subgingival biofilm were obtained from the most severe site in each oral quadrant at the base of the periodontal pocket. The crevicular fluid was obtained by introducing filter paper for 60 s. Subgingival biofilm was obtained with a sterile Gracey curette (Hu-Friedy). For Candida spp. identification, crevicular fluid, and subgingival biofilm were collected in thioglycolate medium (BD) tubes. Non-stimulated saliva samples were collected in a clean 2 mL amber tubes and stored at −70°C. All samples were collected before noon after periodontal evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Subgingival Microbial Plaque Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The subgingival microbial dental plaque samples were obtained at the first and third months. The clinician gently removed the subgingival microbial dental plaque from the deepest periodontal pockets of the patients using a sterile Gracey curette (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, USA). Subsequently, the levels of T. forsythia, P. gingivalis, and T. denticola were determined through DNA sequencing. DNA was isolated from the samples using the kit (GeneMATRIX, EurXTM, Gdansk, Poland) in line with the manufacturer’s instructions. Prior to DNA sequencing readout, the 16S V3 and V4 regions in each sample were amplified using PCR during amplicon library preparation. For the DNA purification, primer dimers and free primers were removed using magnetic beads (AMPure XP, Beckman Coulter, California, USA). This method was used to determine the genes by searching the sequence in terms of similarities and protein-coding potential and mutations in the genes, and also by comparing the sequences of the identified bacteria with those registered in Genbank (NCBI, GenBank, Bethesda, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Identification of Periodontal Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plaque specimens were collected from chronic periodontitis patients. The subgingival plaque specimens were collected by injecting Gracey-curette (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, USA). When curette touches the bottom of the periodontal pocket with no harm to soft tissues, a subgingival plaque was collected with a single perpendicular stroke. The plaque specimen was subsequently transferred to Sodium thioglycolate, an anaerobic transport media, (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany).
Red complex bacteria such as T. forsythia, P. gingivalis and T. denticola as well as A. actinomycetemcomitans, a molar incisor grade IV periodontitis was isolated on the selective media as described previously (Saquib et al., 2019 ). The bacterial strains were further incubated in an anaerobic jar (Don Whitley Scientific Ltd., West Yorkshire, UK) with an environment having 10% carbon dioxide, 10% hydrogen and 80% nitrogen at 37 °C for 3–7 days. The desire bacteria grown on the selective media were further identified based on the colony morphology, and use of biochemical tests for identification of species.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peri-implant and Periodontal Treatment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peri-apical radiographs were obtained using the parallel technique, and the peri-implant bone levels were evaluated. Patients received a full mouth examination one week after supragingival scaling. Periodontal parameters, including pocket probing depth (PPD), bleeding index (BI) (Mazza et al., 1981 (link)), and plaque index (PLI) (Silness and Loe, 1964 (link)), were recorded at all six sites (mesio-buccal, mid-buccal, disto-buccal, mesio-lingual, mid-lingual, and disto-lingual) for each tooth. All clinical examinations were performed by the same clinician, and the treatment procedure was performed by another clinician.
Before treatment, oral hygiene instructions were provided to improve the plaque control. Under appropriate anesthesia, debridement with titanium curettes (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) and irrigation with 0.12% chlorhexidine were performed for the diseased peri-implant sites. For periodontitis sites, scaling and root planing using an ultrasonic device and a metal curette (Gracey curette, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) were performed before peri-implant mechanical debridement. A re-examination was performed eight weeks after the treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Periodontal Treatment and GCF Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the initial visit, periodontal measurements of all participants were recorded, and their baseline GCF samples were collected at least two days later. Patients with severe periodontitis underwent oral hygiene instructions, full-mouth supragingival debridement, and quadrant-based SRP using both ultrasonic scalers (MiniPiezon, EMS Dental, Nyon, Switzerland) and hand instruments (Gracey Curette; Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) under local anesthesia within one month. Follow-up examinations and GCF sample collections were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, with clinical measurements taken at each subsequent follow-up appointment. In addition, supportive periodontal therapy including oral hygiene instructions and supragingival debridement was provided at each subsequent visit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Periosteum Extraction and RNA Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The periosteum from four different skeletal sites (F-frontal bone, H-hyoid bone, P-parietal bone, T-tibia), each representing a unique signature of embryonic Hox code (positive/negative) and embryonic origin (neural crest (NC)/mesoderm) were analyzed. After the soft tissues were carefully removed, the periosteum was collected with a Gracey curette (Hu Friedy, Chicago, IL) and stored in RNAlater (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The tissues were homogenized in Qiazol (Qiagen) with a mortar and pestle complemented with Qiashredder columns (Qiagen) then purified with the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA purity was verified with Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and the integrity was evaluated with Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Only samples with 260/230 ratios superior to 2.0 and RIN superior to 8 were further analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!