The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

529 protocols using spss ver 18

1

Comparing Dental Implant Seeding and Printing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test using SPSS (ver.18) software for a comparison between the groups. p < 0.05 was used as the significance level.
Difference of length of the portion in contact with the periodontal ligament like soft tissue between the seeding group (G1, G2) and the printing group (G3, G4) was compared using Kruskal–Wallis analysis followed by Jonckheere–Terpstra test using SPSS (ver.18) software for a comparison between the groups. p < 0.05 was used as the significance level. Description of each group were summarized in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Assessing Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Independent t-test was performed to compare clinical and radiological results of preoperative and last follow-up assessments using SPSS ver. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Calculation of survival rates and standard deviations was also done using SPSS ver. 18.0. Log-rank test was used to determine the relationship between the survival rate and gender and causative diseases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Normalization Time Correlates with Demographics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data was expressed as mean±standard deviation. We performed independent sample t-tests and an analysis of variance to identify correlations between the normalization time and demographic variables. For a post hoc analysis, we used Scheffé method. Statistical analysis was done using the IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Comparison Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY) was used for the statistical analyses. The χ2 test and student t-test were used for the comparisons between the CG and NCG, as appropriate. A P value of < .05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Postural Control Effects of PV-Induced Motion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the influences of PV induced moving people on postural control in healthy adults, one-way repeated analysis of variance was used. As a post hoc test, the Bonferroni correction was utilized, and the significance level was set at α=0.05. The collected data were analysed using IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical data were analyzed by chi-square tests, and t-tests were used for interval/ordinal data. Functional primary patency and AVF survival, stratified by the assessment method (physical examination alone or duplex ultrasound), were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, with patient follow-up censored for death, renal transplant, or transfer to a nonparticipating dialysis unit. The Cox multivariate proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors of clinical outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA), with P-values ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Radiography vs. Endoscopy Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) and R ver. 2.15.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; http://www.r-project.org/) were used for statistical analyses. Chi-square test and Student t-test for independent samples were used for comparisons between the radiography and endoscopy groups. For all data analyses, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multivariate Analysis of ERCP Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pearson chi-square test for categorical variables and linear-by-linear association method for continuous variables were employed in univariate analyses to evaluate the association of multiple clinical parameters between the ERCP group and control group. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine for correlation between clinical parameters and postoperative ERCP. IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) was employed for statistical analyses. A probability value below 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Efficacy of Tube Insertion for Chronic OME

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample size was determined on the basis of published data regarding the efficacy of tube insertion in reducing the prevalence of middle ear effusion in children with chronic OME [12 (link)]. Assuming that there would be no patients lost to follow-up and a standard deviation of 0.20, it was calculated that 60 subjects in each group would lead to a beta error margin of 0.20, an alpha value of 0.05, and a power of 80%.
The results are given as arithmetical mean values±standard deviation. Age distribution and percentage choanal obstruction due to adenoidal hypertrophy before and after surgery were tested using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test, and Fisher exact probability test was used to analyse the between-group differences in the tympanometric, audiometric and otoscopic findings.
The statistical analyses were made using the IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA); a P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cognitive Enhancement Gymnastics for Elderly Dementia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, we analyzed the data by using the IBM SPSS ver. 18.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Specifically, we conducted paired t-tests to compare performance between pretests and posttest, and to verify the effectiveness of the cognitive enhancement gymnastics program for the elderly with dementia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!