The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pcr clean up and gel extraction kit

Manufactured by Macherey-Nagel
Sourced in Germany

The PCR clean-up and gel extraction kit is a laboratory product designed to purify and extract DNA samples from PCR reactions and agarose gels. It is used to remove unwanted components, such as primers, nucleotides, and salts, from the DNA sample, providing a purified and concentrated DNA product for further analysis or applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using pcr clean up and gel extraction kit

1

Plasmid Construction and Transformation Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids were constructed in E. coli DH5α from PCR-generated fragments (All-in HiFi, highQu, Kraichtal, Germany) and isolated with the Plasmid GeneJET Miniprep kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany). Oligonucleotides used in this study were obtained from Metabion (Planegg/Steinkirchen, Germany) and are listed in Table 5. Standard reactions like restriction, and PCR were performed as described previously [83 ]. Besides cloning by restriction, Gibson assembly was applied for the construction of plasmids [44 (link)]. If applicable, PCR products were purified using the PCR clean-up and gel extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). For transformation of E. coli DH5α, the RbCl method was used and C. glutamicum was transformed via electroporation [84 (link)] at 2.5 kV, 200 Ω, and 25 µF. All cloned DNA fragments were confirmed by sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial DNA Extraction and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P. aeruginosa genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using the UltraClean Microbial Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmid DNA was extracted from JM83 E. coli strains using the Roche High Pure plasmid extraction kit (Basel, Switzerland). PCR-amplified products were purified using the PCR clean-up and gel extraction kit (Macherey Nagel, Dueren, Germany). The QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) was used to extract DNA from the agarose gels according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay for MalR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As part of the investigation of the binding properties of MalR and as an in vitro verification of the results obtained by ChAP-seq analysis, EMSAs were performed. Therefore, 100 bp DNA fragments, centering the peak maximum of each particular promoter region, were amplified using PCR (oligonucleotide sequences are given in the Supplementary Table S3C) and analyzed and purified using an agarose gel with subsequent gel extraction with the “PCR clean-up and Gel extraction” Kit from Macherey-Nagel (Düren, Germany). A total of 90 ng of DNA per lane was incubated with different molar excesses of purified MalR protein (threefold and 10-fold molar excess) for 30 min in bandshift-buffer [50 mM Tris–HCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 40 mM KCl, 5% (v/v) glycerol, pH 7.5]. Subsequently, samples were separated using a 10% native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described previously (Pfeifer et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cypor-deficient Hepatocyte Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA extraction from homogenized liver tissue was performed using the MasterPure Complete DNA and RNA Purification Kit (Lucigen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. A 700–base pair region surrounding the PAM site of the Cypor gRNA was amplified (forward primer 5′-GTTTGCGGGTGTTAGCTCTTC-3′; reverse primer 5′-AGTCTACTTCAGTCGCAGCC-3′) using MyTaq Red Mix (Bioline). The amplicon was purified using the PCR cleanup and gel extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel) and Sanger-sequenced using the forward primer. In-dels were analyzed using the TIDE software (https://tide.nki.nl) (34 (link)). Percent Cypor-deficient hepatocytes was estimated assuming that hepatocytes account for 60% of total liver DNA (raw percent in-dels ÷ 0.6 = percent Cypor-deficient hepatocytes).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Cypor Deficiency in Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA extraction from homogenized liver tissue was performed using the MasterPure Complete DNA and RNA Purification Kit (Lucigen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. An 800–base pair region surrounding the target site of the Cypor sgRNA was amplified (forward primer 5′-GTTTGCGGGTGTTAGCTCTTC-3′; reverse primer 5′-TTGGTGGGTAAATCACACCGT-3′) using MyTaq Red Mix (Bioline). The amplicon was purified using the PCR clean-up and gel extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel) and Sanger sequenced using the forward primer. Indels were analyzed using the TIDE software (https://tide.nki.nl)(17 (link)). The percentage of Cypor-deficient hepatocytes was estimated assuming that hepatocytes account for 60% of total liver DNA (percent indels ÷ 0.6 = percent Cypor-deficient hepatocytes).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of CRISPR-Induced Mutations in Liver

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Insertion and deletion mutations were quantified with the assumption that hepatocytes comprise 60% of the liver54 (link). Harvested livers were homogenized in saline at a 1:1 ratio and stored at −80 °C until extraction was performed. Genomic DNA was extracted from homogenized liver tissue using the MasterPure Complete DNA and RNA Purification kit (Lucigen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The region surrounding the Cypor gRNA cut site (Forward primer: 5′-GTTTGCGGGTGTTAGCTCTTC-3′, Reverse primer: 5′-AGTCTACTTCAGTCGCAGCC-3′) and Hpd gRNA cut site (Forward primer: 5′-GAACTGGGATTGGCTAGTGC-3′, Reverse primer: 5′-GCCCTTCCCTACATCCTAGT-3′) were amplified with MyTaq Red Mix (Bioline). PCR products were then purified using the PCR clean-up and gel extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel) and Sanger sequenced. The forward primers served as sequencing primers. Indels for each mouse were analyzed using the TIDE software, https://tide.nki.nl26 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plasmid Construction and Transformation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids were constructed with Gibson assembly [32 (link)] or classical restriction and ligation. PCR-generated fragments (All-in HiFi, highQu, Kraichtal, Germany) were assembled into isolated plasmids (Plasmid GeneJET Miniprep kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany) that were linearized by restriction. Oligonucleotides used in this study were obtained from Metabion (Planegg/Steinkirchen, Germany) and are listed in Table 2. Standard reactions like restriction, and PCR were performed as described previously [33 ]. If applicable, PCR products were purified using the PCR clean-up and gel extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). For transformation of E. coli DH5α, the RbCl method was used and C. glutamicum was transformed via electroporation [34 (link)] at 2.5 kV, 200 Ω, and 25 µF. Vector construction was confirmed by sequencing of cloned inserts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!