Assay design 3
Assay Design 3.1 software is a bioinformatics tool used for the design and optimization of molecular assays. It provides functionalities for primer and probe selection, specificity analysis, and assay performance assessment.
Lab products found in correlation
36 protocols using assay design 3
Genotyping of Genetic Variants Using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry
SNP Genotyping by MALDI-TOF-MS
SNP Genotyping by MALDI-TOF MS
DNA Extraction and Genotyping Protocol
Genetic Variant Analysis in Migraine
PROGINS insertion/deletion was tested with a standard PCR. Samples were then observed on a 2% agarose gel to detect the presence of the PROGINS insert (details in Additional file
A total of 34 SNPs were selected from 14 different genes on nine chromosomes as the research panel for the study. Selected SNPs were located in genes involved in neuronal, hormonal and immunologic pathways previously associated with migraine. The SNPs were tested by using the Sequenom genotyping platform (Sequenom®, San Diego, CA, USA), which uses MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy and MassARRAY technology with an iPlex system. Primers for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and single base extension were designed by Sequenom Assay Design 3.1 software (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Additional file
Genetic Association of RETN Polymorphism
XRCC1 Polymorphisms Detection
SNP Genotyping of Obesity and MS
Chicken Genomic DNA Isolation and SNP Genotyping
The SNP genotyping of 724 samples was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) based on the Mass ARRAY iPLEX Platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). In these chip analyses, we randomly designed 5 repeats to guarantee the reliability of these genotyping methods. Two polymerase chain reaction primers and one extension primer were designed by Assay Design 3.1 software (Sequenom, USA) for each SNP, as shown in
Methylation Analysis of SYNE1 and MAGI2 Genes
Amplification using methylation-specific primers was considered to indicate a positive result for methylation. No amplification using methylation-specific primers, or amplification using nonmethylation-specific primers was considered as negative methylation. In addition, amplifications using methylation-specific and nonmethylation-specific primers that also exhibited partial methylation were considered as positive methylation.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!