The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 18.0 program

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 18.0 is a statistical software program developed by IBM. It is designed to analyze and manage data, perform advanced statistical analysis, and generate reports. The core function of SPSS 18.0 is to provide users with a comprehensive set of tools for data manipulation, visualization, and modeling.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

15 protocols using spss 18.0 program

1

Coffee Intake Differences in Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 18.0 programs (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis and, to identify differences among the four groups in relation to coffee intake, means and standard deviations were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and frequency was analyzed by χ2 test. When significant difference appeared among the groups, turkey's multi-range test was conducted as post-hoc test. Statistical significance was determined at P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Bone Mineral Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 18.0 programs (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. All data were reported as mean±standard deviation or as numbers and percentages. To identify the factors that differed between the 2 or 3 groups, demographic factors and BMD were compared by conducting an independent t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test after confirming distribution normality. When significant difference appeared among the BMD in groups, turkey's multi-range test was conducted as post-hoc test. Furthermore, the equal variance test, χ2 test, or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Group Differences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 18.0 programs (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis to identify differences among the 3 groups, means and standard deviations were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and frequency was analyzed by χ2 test. All results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analysis of Factors Associated with Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS 18.0 programs (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis and, to identify differences among the 3 groups, means and SDs were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and frequency was analyzed by χ2 test. When significant difference appeared among the groups, turkey's multi-range test was conducted as post-hoc test. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multinomial logistic regression to estimate the association be-tween disease and various factors. Adjusted ORs were derived after adjusting the covariates. The proportional changes and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the exponentiation of the coefficients, which means that the proportional changes in the arithmetic mean were associated with each level of covariate relative to a reference level. All P-values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Maple Leaf Extract Antioxidant Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of variance was performed on all variables measured using the general linear model (GLM) procedure in SPSS 18.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For the analysis of antioxidant activity of maple leaf extract, the extraction time was considered as a main effect. In the case of physicochemical analysis of gelatin gels, protein concentration, the addition of maple leaf extract, and their interaction were fixed as main effects. Duncan’s multiple range test was used to determine the significance of the differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviations. Statistical significance was assessed with one-way and multi-way ANOVA by employing the SPSS 18.0 program (ver. 18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The comparisons between two groups were carried out, using t-test and the samples were considered as significantly different when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chicken Breast Rigor and Salting Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental design of this study was a completely randomized block design with three independent batches (n = 3). Analysis of variance was performed on all variables measured using the general linear model (GLM) procedure in SPSS 18.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Between intact pre-rigor chicken breast and intact post-rigor chicken breast, the significance of difference was determined using Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). For pre- and post-rigor salting treatments, three-way ANOVA was performed, in which salt type, rigor status, and ionic strength were fixed as the main effects, and their interactions were also considered. t-Test and Tukey’s method were used to determine the significance of the differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Larvicidal Bioassay Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The larvicidal bioassays with more than 20% mortality in control tests and more than 20% pupae formed were discarded and carried out again. The control mortality ranging between 5 and 20% was corrected using Abbott’s formula (18 ).
CM =TC100C×100
where, CM is the corrected mortality, T is the % mortality observed in experimental tests, and C is the % mortality in control tests. The larvicidal data were subjected to probit regression analysis based on generalized linear model using computerized SPSS 18.0 Program. The regression analysis models the normal distribution of the relationship between response (% mortality) and dose (concentration) as a linear model via a link function by the transformation of % mortality in probit values. The LC50 and LC90 values with 95% fiducial limit were calculated in each bioassay to measure the difference between the test samples. Other statistical parameters, such as regression coefficient and standard error were also calculated. The fitted model is assessed by statistics for heterogeneity, which follow a chi-square distribution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Evaluation of Treatment Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were expressed as mean ± standard error (S.E) (n = 3). Data from all measured variables were analyzed using the general linear model (GLM) procedure in the SPSS 18.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In the variables with statistically significant effects at 5% critical value, Tukey’s multiple range test was used to determine the significance of the differences between treatments (p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Compound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma were estimated from the mean concentration values using noncompartmental pharmacokinetic analysis with the Das 2.0 program (Mathematical Pharmacology Professional Committee of China, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China). All data are expressed as mean ± SD. The difference among the groups was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance or Student’s t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 18.0 program (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!