The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qe hf mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany

The QE-HF mass spectrometer is a high-resolution, accurate-mass instrument designed for advanced analytical applications. It utilizes Orbitrap technology to provide accurate mass measurements for the identification and quantification of chemical compounds. The core function of the QE-HF is to perform precise and sensitive mass analysis of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using qe hf mass spectrometer

1

Comparative Proteomic Analysis of sEVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
sEVs derived from MDA-MB-231 and MCF10-A cells and plasma from healthy donors and TNBC patients underwent mass spectrometry at the Smoler Proteomic Center (Technion, Haifa). The proteins were cleaved with trypsin and analyzed by LC-MS/MS using a QE HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). The data were identified using MaxQuant 1.5.2.8, against UniProt and decoy databases, to determine the false discovery rate. Statistical analyses were performed using the Perseus software. Missing proteins were imputed at 17 (log2). The identified proteins were filtered with an FDR < 0.01. The log2 intensities can be observed in the label-free quantification (LFQ)-normalized intensities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Proteomics of Virus Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(1) Skyline (MacLean et al., 2010 (link)), (2) Software for peptide/protein assignment from LC-MS/MS data (Proteome Discoverer, MSFragger, etc.), (3) LC mass spectrometer with targeted MS capabilities, such as a triple quadrupole instrument for multiple reaction monitoring or a quadrupole-high resolution and accurate mass analyzer (i.e., Orbitrap or time-of-flight [ToF] mass analyzer) for PRM (a ThermoFisher QE-HF mass spectrometer was used in our study of herpesviruses), (4) Virus-infected samples (at time points covering the stages of entry, genome replication, assembly, and egress), and (5) Mock-infected (i.e., uninfected) samples (optional).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UHPLC-MS-Based Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic separation on a Vanquish UHPLC system, with a SeQuant ZIC pHILIC column (150 × 2.1 mm i.d., 5 μm) coupled to a QE-HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA)27 (link), was performed with a mobile phase that consisted of (A) 10 mmol/L AcONH4 in water (pH 9.8) and (B) ACN. The gradient was as follows: 0.0–1.0 min (90% B), 1.0–15.0 min (30% B), 15.0–18.0 min (30% B), 18.0–19.0 min (90% B), 19.0–29.0 min (90% B), and then initial conditions were maintained for 5 min to equilibrate the column. The flow rate was 250 μL/min, and the injection volumes were set to 2 μL. All samples, including a QC sample that contained equal amounts of each sample, were analyzed by negative and positive electrospray ionization in full scan MS mode with a mass range of 70–1050 m/z, while the rest setting of the MS parameters was the same as those for C18. The acquired raw files were processed using Compound Discoverer 2.1, as previously described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Proteome Analysis by UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tryptic peptides were resuspended in 0.1% formic acid (Sigma) at a concentration of 0.5mg/mL for instrumental analysis. Samples were analyzed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 UPLC coupled to a Thermo Scientific QE-HF mass spectrometer. Solvents consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water as buffer A and 0.1% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile as buffer B. LC gradients consisted of a trapping phase from 0 to 18 minutes at 4% B moving to 40% at 120 minutes, 75% B from minutes 120.5 to 130, 97% B from minutes 130.5 to 140, and 4% B from minutes 140.5 to 155. Survey scans of peptide precursors from 300 to 1500 m/z were performed using a resolving power of 60,000 with an AGC target of 1 x 106 and maximum injection time of 150 ms. The top 20 precursors were then selected for higher energy collisional dissociation fragmentation with a normalized collision energy of 30, an isolation width of 2.0 Da, resolving power of 15,000, an AGC target of 5 x 104, a maximum injection time of 150 ms and a lower mass limit of 120.0 m/z. Precursors were subject to dynamic exclusion for 15 seconds with a 10-ppm mass tolerance. Each sample was acquired in technical triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Canine Proteomics Workflow for Biomarker Discovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detailed proteomics methodology is provided as supplementary information. Serum and synovial fluid samples were prepared for liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) analysis by solubilization, reduction, and alkylation followed by digestion with trypsin. The desalted samples were randomized and injected onto a Thermo QEHF mass spectrometer and collected using data independent acquisition. Spectronaut (version 15) [27 (link)] was employed for protein identification and quantification, using the reference Canus Lupus Familiaris proteome from Uniprot. Perseus (1.6.14.0) [28 (link)] was employed for data processing and statistical analysis using the MS2 intensity values generated by Spectronaut. The data were log2 transformed and normalized by subtracting the median for each sample. Statistical analysis of acquired data was performed as described below. The proteins that were exclusively detected in one experimental group were also reported for further bioinformatics analysis. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed for both synovial fluid and serum results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MALDI-MS Imaging of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SubAP-MALDI source was coupled with a QE-HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) for all data acquisition. A software tool (Target-ng, MassTech, Columbia, MD) was used to control the XY stage motion in the ion source, while iFunnel software (MassTech, Columbia, MD) was utilized to control the ion funnel operation. In the dried droplet sample preparation method, peptide standards were premixed with matrix solutions and then applied onto an ABI Opti-TOF 192 target plate (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and analyzed using a spiral motion mode for the laser spot travel across the sample surface. For MSI, constant speed raster motion was used. The mass spectrometer was operated in the MS mode with positive polarity. A mass range of m/z 400–4,000 was used, and the resolution was set at 120,000 unless otherwise specified. Automatic gain control (AGC) target was set to 3×106 with 300 ms maximum injection time. The AGC value was high enough to ensure that in every scan the ion accumulation took place exactly during 300 ms injection time which, with the constant scan speed of the MALDI target plate, ensured each pixel was the same size and prevented the Orbirap cell from being overloaded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Proteomics of Virus Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(1) Skyline (MacLean et al., 2010 (link)), (2) Software for peptide/protein assignment from LC-MS/MS data (Proteome Discoverer, MSFragger, etc.), (3) LC mass spectrometer with targeted MS capabilities, such as a triple quadrupole instrument for multiple reaction monitoring or a quadrupole-high resolution and accurate mass analyzer (i.e., Orbitrap or time-of-flight [ToF] mass analyzer) for PRM (a ThermoFisher QE-HF mass spectrometer was used in our study of herpesviruses), (4) Virus-infected samples (at time points covering the stages of entry, genome replication, assembly, and egress), and (5) Mock-infected (i.e., uninfected) samples (optional).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!