The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using cheetah software

1

Tracking Rat Movement and Weight Lift Task

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Local field potentials were recorded using a Neuralynx acquisition system (either a Digital Lynx SX or SX-M) at 6400 or 5000 Hz, respectively, with a bandpass filter set between 0.1 and 500 Hz. Rats were tethered via a Neuralynx Saturn-1 commutator to either a Neuralynx HS-36-LED or HS-36-mux-LED preamp headstage. Rat position was tracked via two headstage-mounted LEDs with Neuralynx Cheetah software using an overhead camera. Rats were ran in a darkened room to allow tracking of the LEDs. The Neuralynx acquisition system also recorded TTL (transistor–transistor logic) signals from the WLT Arduino Uno Microcontroller that was time-stamped when the weight was lifted off the base, when the weight returned down to the base, and when the weight was successfully pulled up 30 cm and a reward was released.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intracortical Neural Signal Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the electrode performance and neuronal activities over time, intracortical neural signals were acquired from freely moving mice in their home cages with a NeuraLynx Digital Data Acquisition System (NeuraLynx, Bozeman, Montana), including a DL 4SX-M 32ch Base, a headstage preamplifier HS-18-CNR-MDR50, a HS-18-N2T-16 adaptor, and Cheetah data acquisition software, at a sampling frequency of 32 kHz. High-frequency (HF) data containing multiple unit activity (MUA, filtered between 900 and 5 kHz) and local field potentials (LFP, filtered between 0.1 and 300 Hz) were saved with Cheetah software (NeuraLynx, Bozeman, Montana). Each recording session lasted about 15 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sleep Activity Monitoring in Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were left undisturbed to recover for 7 days after surgery and then habituated for 5–7 days in the recording chamber. On recording days, animals were transferred to the recording chamber where their sleep activity was recorded starting from 8:30 AM for 4 hr using a motorized commutator (NeuroTek Innovative Technology Inc, On, Canada). LFPs and EMG activity were amplified, filtered (0.1–4000 Hz) and digitized at 16 kHz using a Digital Lynx SX Electrophysiology System (Neuralynx Inc, MT) and the data were recorded and stored on a local PC using Cheetah software (Neuralynx, Inc MT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Hippocampal LFP and Neck EMG Recordings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After electrode implantation, the animals were allowed to recover for 7 days before being habituated to the recording setup consisting of a home-cage without the lid placed in the middle of a large Plexiglas box used as secondary containment. During 24 hour LFP and EMG recordings, the electrophysiological tethers were connected to a motorized commutator (NeuroTek Inc.). The hippocampal LFP and neck EMG signals were amplified, filtered (0.1–2000 Hz) and digitized at 4 kHz using a Digital Lynx SX System (Neuralynx, Inc.) and Cheetah software (Neuralynx, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing Neuronal Firing Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For unit analysis, raw signals were first bandpass filtered (256th order finite impulse response, 600–9000 Hz), then the MUA spikes were extracted by Neuralynx Cheetah software with the amplitude threshold set at four times the standard deviation of the background signal amplitude. The background signals were taken from 10 s of recordings during waking without movement artifacts. The analysis periods for the spike firing rate and HFOs were 50 ms for the preictal pauses and interictal events and 200 ms for the ictal events throughout this paper. To make the peri-ictal time histogram, the MUA counts were first segregated into 10 ms bins, and the occurrence of the first spike of the ictal events was set as time 0. To determine the timing of MUA firing with regard to the phase of the LFP slow waves, raw signals were bandpass filtered for slow wave oscillations (1–8 Hz); the instantaneous phase of these slow waves was calculated by Hilbert transform, then the timestamps of MUA were matched to the phase of the oscillations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HIFU Effects on Cortical Neuronal Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize effect of HIFU on brain surface activities, we used µECoG arrays (Neuronexus) with 16 small recording electrodes (surface area ~0.03 mm2) arranged in a 4 × 4 grid, allowing us to sample small populations of neurons from the superficial layers of cortex at high resolution. Epidural neural signals were acquired with a NeuraLynx Digital Data Acquisition System, including a DL 4SX-M 32ch Base, a headstage pre-amplifier HS-18-CNR-MDR50, a HS-18-N2T-16 adaptor and Cheetah data acquisition software, at a sampling frequency of 16 kHz from freely moving animals in their home cages. High pass filtered (HPF; 900 to 5 kHz) and ECoG (0.1 and 300 Hz) signals were saved with Cheetah software (NeuraLynx). The animals’ behavioral state was simultaneously recorded and classified into Move or Resting status with HomeCageScan software (CleverSys) during electrophysiological recordings.
Ipsilateral and contralateral ECoG data were collected from different cohorts of animals. Contralateral animals were allowed to recover from implantation surgery for a week, then four-week baseline data were collected (Fig. 1A, n = 10 in both HIFU and sham groups). In ipsilateral cohort, animals were subjected to HIFU/sham treatment immediately before ECoG array implantation surgery, therefore, no baseline data were collected (Fig. 1A in purple, n = 4 in both HIFU and sham groups).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Hippocampal Place Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of place cells in the dorsal CA1 region of the hippocampus was completed as previously described (Faust et al., 2010 (link); Chang et al., 2015 (link)). A mouse was anesthetized with 0.25% isofluorane and implanted with a 16-channel multi-electrode array containing four tetrodes. After recovery, single-unit firing was recorded using Cheetah software (Neuralynx) while the animal explored a square chamber (40 cm on the side) in a schedule of four exploration runs (15 min) separated by three rest sessions (5 min) in the home cage. Recordings were repeated over two consecutive days. Acquired data were analyzed using Spike2 (version 8, Cambridge Electronic Design), NeuroExplorer (version 5, Nex Technologies), and Matlab.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multichannel neural recording with tetrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tetrodes were connected to a multichannel, impedance matching, unity gain headstage (Neuralynx). The output of the headstage was conducted to a data acquisition system (Cheetah software, Neuralynx). Unit activity was amplified by a factor of 3000–5000 and band-pass filtered from 600 Hz to 6000 Hz. Spike waveforms above a threshold set by the experimenter (~30 μV) were time-stamped and digitized at 32 kHz for 1 ms. Notch filters were not applied. Tetrodes were advanced 40–80 μm to record a different group of cells in each session of a same type (either control or inhibition session) at the same recording position, assuring that identical cells were not double counted in a given recoding group. We typically advanced tetrodes after the recording of one control session and one inhibition session.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spike Sorting and Unit Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tetrode signals were recorded with a Neuralynx Digital Lynx system using Neuralynx Cheetah software (Neuralynx, MT, USA) (Matsumoto et al., 2020 (link)). Spikes were detected online, and the multi-unit activity was sorted into single-unit activity offline with Spike Sort 3D software (Neuralynx, MT, USA). Cluster classification was performed using previous methods (Matsumoto et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, clusters were considered to represent single units if the isolation distance was ≥ 20 and L-ratio ≤ 0.3. Only units with a peak-to-peak width greater than 250 μs were classified as putative excitatory neurons and were used for this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Behavioral Data Analysis in Neuroscience Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In all conditions, behavioral data were analyzed using custom-made Matlab scripts. Instantaneous speed (or virtual speed) was derived from video tracking data (or virtual X and Y coordinates recorded as voltage signals in Neuralynx Cheetah software) and downsampled to 10 Hz for consistency with spectrogram and coherogram data (see below). Only epochs of active movement, defined by a sustained speed above 3 cm/s for a minimum of 4 s, were selected for further analysis.
In the home-cage environment, there was one case in which video tracking was not available and the epochs of active movement were thus defined by an amplitude threshold in EMG signal and the presence of a high theta/delta ratio in the hippocampal recordings.
For linear track and virtual reality-based experiments, active movement periods (instantaneous speed >3 cm/s) were analyzed from each 12 min session (three sessions per day) for overall calculations. Each session was then subdivided in to trials (runs), that is, each time the animal traversed the track from one reward site to the other, and measurements of speed, power and coherence were averaged by distance from reward location in 1 cm bins normalized by the occupancy (time spent in each bin).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!