The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

83 protocols using experiment builder

1

Primate Behavioral Experiments in Controlled Environment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to surgery, each animal was adapted to a custom fitted primate chair and to the recording chamber. After the post-surgical recovery period, monkeys were acclimated to handling and sitting in their custom fitted chair. Animals were brought to the laboratory up to five times per week for training sessions. To decrease movement and accurately monitor eye position, once comfortable in the chair, monkeys were trained to allow their head to be painlessly restrained using the implanted headpost and/or embedded Plexiglas bars.
All tasks were performed in a sound attenuated chamber, lined with SONEX ProSPEC Composite™ sound absorbing foam. During recording, the only light source in the room was a CRT monitor. The eye-to-screen distance was 34.5 inches and the monitor encompassed 25.6° × 19° of visual space. Experiments were programmed and run using SR Research Experiment Builder (SR Research Ltd., Mississauga, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Motorcycle Simulator-Based Risk Perception Task

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SR Research Experiment Builder (SR Research Ltd., Mississauga, ON, Canada) was used to run the risk perception task, consisting of 140 real traffic pictures taken from the driver's perspective. The risk levels of the traffic situations were categorized into 70 high‐risk pictures and 70 low‐risk pictures (see Megías et al., 2015 for more details). All stimuli were projected on the screen using the same parameters as the HRT, with the participant seated on the motorcycle simulator in order to mimic a more realistic environment.
Every trial of the risk perception task began with a 750 ms fixation point that appeared at the center of a white screen followed by a 2,000‐ms traffic scene. The participants were required to indicate whether the traffic scene was risky or not, pulling the front brake only when they perceived risk and not responding at all if they did not perceive the situation as risky. After 2,000 ms, a black screen was displayed for 750 ms. The proportion of affirmative responses of risk perception and correct answers (according to the picture category) were computed for the two picture types (high/low risk) for each subject.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visually Guided Saccade Task in Oculomotor Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oculomotor testing was administered in a darkened black room using a chinrest positioned 61 cm from a 27-inch BenQ monitor (refresh rate: 144 Hz; resolution: 2,560 × 1,440). Visual stimuli were presented using SR Research Experiment Builder (SR Research Ltd., Ontario, CA, United States), and participants’ eye movements were recorded using an EyeLink 1000 Plus infrared, binocular camera (sampling rate: 500 Hz; accuracy: 0.25–0.5°; SR Research Ltd., Ontario, CA, United States). Participants performed a five-point calibration prior to each block of trials.
Participants completed 60 trials of a visually guided saccade task, separated into two blocks (30 trials per block). During this task, participants fixed their gaze on a centrally located crosshair for 1.5–2 s at the start of each trial (Figure 1D), then were presented peripheral targets (Figure 1E) (i.e., white circles, 0.3° in diameter) at ± 12° or 24° of visual angle for 1.5 ss.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Experiment on Implicit Association Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiment took place at the Faculty of Psychology of the University of Vienna. All three parts of the experiment (the expertise questionnaire, the explicit rating scale, and the IAT) were administered on a 19-in. TFT monitor with a resolution of 1280 × 1024 pixels and a refresh rate of 60 Hz. A keyboard and a standard USB computer mouse were placed in front of the participants. A table lamp served as an indirect light source behind the monitor. A chin rest and forehead strip ensured a viewing distance of 57 cm. Stimuli presentation was programed using the SR Research Experiment Builder (version 1.10.165; SR Research, 2004). Data were analyzed using the R programming software (version 3.2.4 Revised, R Core Team, 2016 ), with the following additional packages: the ‘MASS’ package (Venables & Ripley, 2002 ) for defining contrasts, the ‘lmerTest’ package (Kuznetsova, Brockhoff, & Christensen, 2016 ) for running linear mixed models, the ‘effects’ package (Fox, 2003 ) for plotting the results, the ‘lsmeans’ package (Lenth, 2016 ) for comparing slopes of fitted lines, and the ‘schoRsch’ package (Pfister & Janczyk, 2015 ) for removing RT outliers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Primate Behavioral Experiments in Controlled Environment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to surgery, each animal was adapted to a custom fitted primate chair and to the recording chamber. After the post-surgical recovery period, monkeys were acclimated to handling and sitting in their custom fitted chair. Animals were brought to the laboratory up to five times per week for training sessions. To decrease movement and accurately monitor eye position, once comfortable in the chair, monkeys were trained to allow their head to be painlessly restrained using the implanted headpost and/or embedded Plexiglas bars.
All tasks were performed in a sound attenuated chamber, lined with SONEX ProSPEC Composite™ sound absorbing foam. During recording, the only light source in the room was a CRT monitor. The eye-to-screen distance was 34.5 inches and the monitor encompassed 25.6° × 19° of visual space. Experiments were programmed and run using SR Research Experiment Builder (SR Research Ltd., Mississauga, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Interaction Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A remote Eyelink 1000 eye-tracker (SR Research) and the software packages Experiment Builder and Data Viewer (SR Research) were used to control the experiment and record and convert the participants' eye movement data. The movements of the left eye were recorded with a sampling frequency of 500 Hz. Finger tapping was recorded by means of a purpose-built four-button box attached to the computer. The buttons were microphones that required very little pressure to record a response and only produced a barely audible sound upon tapping. The participants' speech was recorded using a Sennheiser ME 64 microphone. Praat software (Boersma & Weenink, 2018) was used to measure the onsets and durations of the confederate's and participants' utterances. In Experiment 2, auditory stimuli were presented using Sennheiser HD 201 headphones.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Binocular Eye Tracking with EyeLink 1000 Plus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An EyeLink 1000 Plus (SR Research Ltd, Ottawa, Canada) recorded binocular eye movements (see [22 ]) at 500 Hz. Participants sat 65 cm away from a 24-inch monitor (1280 × 1024 pixels, 120 Hz) and a chinrest was used to prevent head movements. Timing and stimuli presentation were handled with Experiment Builder (SR Research Ltd, Ottawa, Canada). Room luminance and screen background (grey coloured; R = 180, G = 180, B = 180) were kept constant throughout the experiment and they were identical for all participants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Eye Movement Tracking for Saccade Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eye movements were recorded using the Eyelink II eye tracker (head-mounted binocular eye tracker, 500 Hz temporal resolution, 0.2° spatial resolution; SR Research Ltd., Mississauga, ON, Canada). Stimuli were presented on a 19-in CRT-monitor (screen resolution 1024 × 768 pixels; refresh rate 110 Hz) at a viewing distance of 62.5 cm. The fixation cross was white with a luminance of 56 cd/m2 viewed against a black background of luminance of less than 0.1 cd/m2. The initial saccadic target was an orange (RGB values of 255, 102, 0) circle (diameter of 0.5°). The reference point was a white (255,255,255) circle (diameter of 0.5°), presented simultaneously with the saccadic target either with an overlap of (0.07°) over the saccadic target, or at the peripheral location (4°) away from the saccadic target.
Subjects were seated in a dimly lit room in a stationary chair with their head stabilized by a chinrest. Stimulus presentation, eye movement and manual keyboard response data acquisition were achieved using real-time experimental control software (Experiment Builder, SR Research Ltd.). At the start of each experiment session, a nine-point gaze calibration was performed followed by a nine-point validation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Eye Tracking in Controlled Lab Setting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eye movements were recorded from the right eye at 500 Hz using an Eyelink 1000 eye tracker, (V4.56; SR Research; Ontario, Canada) with remote camera upgrade, desktop mount, 16 mm lens and target sticker. Stimuli were displayed on a HP Compaq LA2205 wide LCD monitor with a 1680 × 1050 resolution, 32 bits per pixel, and a refresh rate of 60 Hz. The free viewing task was programmed with Experiment Builder (V1.10.1241; SR-Research; Ontario, Canada). We used a 5-point calibration procedure and accepted the calibration when the average error was less than 1°of visual angle [31] . All stimuli were presented in white on a black background. Testing took place in a purpose-built laboratory at Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia. Lighting and temperature (23 °C) were standardised.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Reaction Time Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli were presented on a 17” Graphics Series G90fB CRT monitor with the refresh rate of 85 Hz. Reaction time (RT) measures were based on standard keyboard responses. Experiments were controlled by the software Experiment Builder (SR Research Ltd., Ontario, Canada). Participants were seated 57 cm away from the monitor, centered with respect to display and keyboard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!