The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistical package for the social sciences version 20

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and presentation. SPSS supports a wide range of statistical techniques, including descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, regression analysis, and multivariate analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

395 protocols using statistical package for the social sciences version 20

1

Quantitative and Qualitative Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were collected, revised, verified, coded, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics for quantitative data: Mean and standard deviation were calculated. Kolmogorov–Smirnov for normality test was used to differentiate between parametric data and non-parametric data. Independent sample t-test used for the analysis of quantitative data. Chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test were used for analysis of qualitative data. For all, P was considered significant if <0.05, highly significant if <0.01, and very highly significant if <0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Social Sciences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 (SPSS, IBM, USA) software was used for statistical analyses. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Qualitative data were analyzed using the chi-square test. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare parameters with non-normal distribution between groups. P<0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed by Mann-Whitney with the Kruskal-Wallis tests using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Each value represents the mean ± standard error of the mean. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered to be significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Investigating Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and TRUST Titers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive analyses were used to describe the incidence rate of each APO. To maintain a normal distribution, the titers from maternal TRUST at treatment were transformed using the log2 of the reciprocal nontreponemal titer (log2 [1/T]) [18 (link)]. Univariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify potential risk factors associated with APOs. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were then conducted to investigate the associations between APOs and potential risk factors. To understand the impact of TRUST titers on pregnancy outcomes, we used the 3rd power simulation smooth line with the highest coefficient of determination (R2). TRUST results were then divided into high- and low-titer groups, with stratified analysis conducted to further explore the effects of different treatment regimens on APOs. All analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 software package for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All reported p values are based on a two-sided test with a significance level of α = 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Assessing COVID-19 Impacts on Imaging Case Volumes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Study design: we performed a retrospective review of imaging case volumes in the main hospitals in the Aseer region (Aseer Central Hospital, Military Hospital, and Khamis Mushait General Hospital). The study period for 2020 was selected to encompass the peak in COVID-19 cases and to capture the subsequent impacts on imaging case volumes, including all cases in 2020 compared with 2019.
Data collection and extraction: In cooperation with the supervisors of the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) system in the selected hospitals, imaging case numbers were provided for each month for 2019 and 2020. The imaging cases were further classified according to department (i.e., emergency department, inpatients, and outpatients), and modality types (e.g., X-ray, ultrasound, computed tomography [CT], interventional radiology, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], nuclear medicine, and mammography).
Statistical analysis: Statistical assessments were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 20; SPSS-Inc.; New York, NY, USA) considering 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05); t-tests and one-way ANOVA were applied to the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Metabolic Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Mann–Whitney U test and the chi-square test were applied to compare continuous and categorical variables. Bivariate correlations were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Non-parametric bivariate tests were selected due to the non-normal distribution of data. Analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) was used to test the effects of each group (patients vs. healthy controls) and the history of ACEs on metabolic parameters. Age, sex, BMI, cigarette smoking status, illness duration and the chlorpromazine equivalent dosage (CPZeq) were included as co-variates. Results were interpreted as significant if the p-value was <0.05. In case of significant interactions in the ANCOVA, post-hoc tests were performed. The Games–Howell test was used to perform post-hoc comparisons. Analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Categorical and Quantitative Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data collected were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 (SPSS Inc., 233 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, USA). Differences in categorical variables between groups were determined using the student t-tests while Chi-squared test was used for continuous variables. Differences in quantitative variables for the different patient groups were determined with ANOVA (with Bonferroni Post-Hoc analysis as appropriate) and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Alcohol and Alcohol-Mixed Energy Drink Consumption

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were collected online via SurveyMonkey® (Palo Alto, CA), cleaned in Microsoft Excel and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution were computed for alcohol consumption and BYAACQ scores for occasions on which participants consumed AO and AMED. Variables with a normal distribution were tested with the Student t-test (Paired t-test for within-subjects, independent t-test for between-subjects). For nominal variables, a Chi Square test was used. For the BYAACQ data, a McNemar test was performed on single items and a paired t-test on the total scores. All tests were two-tailed, and differences were regarded as significant at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparing Glaucoma Surgical Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean with standard deviation. BCVA and the number of glaucoma medications were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A comparison of the extent of preoperative and postoperative ECD was performed using the paired t-test. Repetitive measures analysis of variance was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative IOPs. We use the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), to perform the above-mentioned analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Categorical Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The collected information was initially entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet
before analysis. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
version 20 (SPSS Inc., USA). The Chi-square test was used to test for the association
between categorical variables. All variables were considered significant at
p≤0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!