The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

K850 critical point dryer

Manufactured by Quorum Technologies
Sourced in United Kingdom

The K850 Critical Point Dryer is a laboratory instrument designed to prepare samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The core function of the K850 is to transition samples from a liquid state to a dry state while preserving the sample's structure and morphology.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using k850 critical point dryer

1

Negative Staining and SEM Imaging of R. felis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For negative staining, 5 μL of the sample was placed onto glow-discharge activated [85 (link)] carbon/formvar grids. After 30 s of adsorption, the grids were negatively stained with 1% ammonium molybdate and 0.1% trehalose for 30 s. The grids were air-dried and examined in an FEI/Philips CM100 electron microscope (FEI).
For scanning electron microscopy, the purified samples of R. felis isolate were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde in SP buffer (3.76 mM KH2PO4, 7.1 mM K2HPO4, 0.218 M sucrose) overnight at 4 °C. The washed cells were then allowed to sediment overnight onto poly-l-lysine-treated circular coverslips or silicon wafers at 4 °C. The coverslips and the wafers with attached bacteria were dehydrated through an alcohol series and critical point dried from liquid CO2 in a K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, United Kingdom). The dried samples were sputter-coated with 3 nm of platinum in a Q150T Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, United Kingdom). The final samples were examined in an FEI Nova NanoSEM scanning electron microscope (FEI) at 5 kV using CBS and TLD detectors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SEM Sample Preparation: Cell Monolayer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell cultures for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were cultured on a cover glass prior to the formation of a monolayer. The cells were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.2, according to Karnovsky) with 5% sucrose, and then postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide water solution. The material was dehydrated in alcohol and acetone, and dried at a critical point in a K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies, UK). A 15 nm gold/palladium layer was deposited onto the surface of the samples in a Q150T Plus metal sputtering device (Quorum Technologies, UK). The cells were studied in an AURIGA FIB-SEM workstation scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss & MT, Germany) with a SE detector in the 50–50 000 magnification range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immune Cells Ultrastructural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Control and TiO2NPs-exposed immune cells (1 μg mL−1 final concentration, 24 h of exposure) that adhered to 12 mm circular glass coverslips (Menzel Gläser, Germany) were fixed with a 1:1 mixture of 6% glutaraldehyde in 100 mM cacodylate buffer and ASW (pH 8–8.5) for 1 h at RT. Coverslips were washed three times with cacodylate buffer, dehydrated through an ethanol series (25, 50, 75, 90, 96, and 100%), and dried in a K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK). The dried coverslips were sputter coated with 3 nm platinum using high-resolution Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater Q150T (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK). The samples were examined in FEI Nova NanoSEM scanning electron microscope (FEI, Czech Republic) at 5 kV using CBS and TLD detectors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Leaf Micromorphology Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of mature leaves were taken with a Nikon SM225 Stereo microscope (Japan). To show the micromorphological traits, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used. The mature leaves were fixed in Formaldehyde-acetic acid-ethanol (FAA) (methanol: acetic acid: ethanol: water = 10:5:50:35), cut into small pieces, and washed in 70% alcohol. Then, they were dehydrated in an increasing alcohol series and iso-amyl acetate series. Afterward, the material was critical-point dried using liquid CO2 with a K850 critical-point dryer (Quorum). The leaf pieces were then mounted on aluminum stubs and sputter-coated with gold using a JS-1600 sputter coater (HTCY). Photos were taken with a Hitachi S-3400 SEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SEM Imaging of Puffed Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images were acquired by a JSM-7800F (JEOL, Akishima, Japan) A field emission scanning electron microscope; puffed rice were dried with a K850 critical point dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Lewes, UK) and coated with a Q150T ES Plus (Quorum Technologies Ltd.) at 18 mA for 90 s with 2 nm AuPd.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fixation and SEM Imaging of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E. coli K-12 ORN172 bacteria harboring pN3 were grown on LB agar plates supplemented with tetracycline and kanamycin. The next day, bacteria were gently scraped off using a bacterial inoculation loop and lightly resuspended in 500 μL saline. 100 μL of the bacterial suspension were applied onto fibronectin-coated 13 mm round “Deckglaser” coverslips and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Following the incubation, coverslips were transferred into 24-well plates, 1 coverslip per well, filled with 1 mL fixation buffer containing 80 mM PIPES NaOH, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 150 mM sucrose, 2% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, [EMS]), 2% glutaraldehyde (EMS) for 20 min at room temperature. Samples were then washed twice for 2 min with 1 mL of 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 (EMS). Secondary fixation was performed with 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate for 10 min. The samples were washed twice for 2 min each in double-distilled water (DDW) and then dehydrated (2 min, twice for each step) under a series of ethanol concentrations (7.5%, 15%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 95%, and 100%). Next, samples underwent critical-point drying using a K850 critical-point dryer (Quorum Technologies). Coating was performed with ~1 nm of iridium using a Q150T coater (Quorum Technologies). Samples were imaged in a Merlin scanning electron microscope (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Plant Epidermis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For observations of the epidermis surface, small pieces of S. officinalis leaf and stem were fixed in standard solution of 25mM phosphate buffer (pH = 7) with 3% glutaraldehyde (Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany), and 0.01% Tween 20. The samples were kept overnight in the same fixative solution without Tween 20. Another fixative used with the same procedure was FAA fixative (50% ethanol, 35% distilled water, 10% formaldehyde, and 5% glacial acetic acid). After overnight fixation at 4 °C samples were washed in phosphate buffer three times at 10-min intervals. The fixed plant material was dehydrated in graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, and 95%) and immersed in absolute ethanol (Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany). Ethanol was evaporated and fixed samples were further dried using critical-point dried in liquid CO2 using a K 850 Critical Point Dryer and sputter-coated with gold (10 mm thickness) using Q1 50R ES (Quorum, Lewes, UK). The observations were carried out using a FE–SEM Tescan Mira III (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) at an accelerating voltage of 4 kV [51 (link),52 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy analysis of the leaves was carried out for two-month-old WT and STO-OE lines according to the previous procedure, with minor modifications [72 (link)]. The leaves were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4 °C. The tissue blocks were washed with 0.1 M Phosphate Buffer (PB, pH 7.4) three times and transferred to 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) made in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) for 1–2 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the tissue blocks were washed three times using 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4). The washed tissue blocks were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and immersed in tert-butanol for 30 min. The samples were dried in the K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Lewes, UK), and then, attached to metallic stubs using carbon stickers and sputter-coated with gold for 30 s. The images were observed and taken with a scanning electron microscope. Stomatal density and guard cell length and width were determined from the images. A stomatal index (SI) was calculated using the following formula: SI = (number of stomata) /(number of stomata + number of other epidermal cells) × 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bacterial Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were cultivated in small-scale under conditions described in Table 1. A volume corresponding approximately to 2 × 109 CFU was pelleted (6000 × g, 15 min, 4°C) and washed twice in 100 mM sodium cacodylate/5 g/L NaCl, pH 7.2. Bacteria were then fixed by 3% glutaraldehyde in the same buffer at RT for 1 h and then at 4°C overnight with slow rotation. Sterility of the fixed solution was checked by aliquot plating. The washed bacterial cells were then allowed to sediment overnight onto poly-L-lysine treated circular coverslips at 4°C. The coverslips with attached bacteria were post-fixed with 1% OsO4 for 1 h at room temperature and three times washed with ddH2O. Washed coverslips with the bacteria were dehydrated through an alcohol series (25, 50, 75, 90, 96, 100, and 100%) followed by absolute acetone and critical point dried from liquid CO2 in a K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd.). The dried samples were sputter coated with 3 nm of platinum in a Q150T Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd.). The final samples were examined in a FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 scanning electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 5 kV using CBS and TLD detectors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Streptomyces Spores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Streptomyces spores were fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde overnight at 4°C. The fixed spores were extensively washed and then allowed to sediment at 4°C overnight onto circular coverslips treated with poly-L-lysine. The coverslips with attached spores were dehydrated through an alcohol series followed by absolute acetone and critical point dried from liquid CO2 in a K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK). The dried samples were sputter-coated with 3 nm of platinum in a Q150T Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK). The final samples were examined in a FEI Nova NanoSEM scanning electron microscope (FEI, Brno, Czech Republic) at 5 kV using CBS and TLD detectors. Beam deceleration mode of scanning electron microscope was used in some cases for minimization of charging artifacts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!