The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cleanup kit

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Germany, Spain

The Cleanup kit is a laboratory product designed to purify and concentrate nucleic acids from various sample types. It efficiently removes contaminants and unwanted components, enabling the isolation of high-quality DNA, RNA, or other nucleic acids for further analysis and applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using cleanup kit

1

Preparation and Analysis of Labeled DNA Duplexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligonucleotides of 13 and 16 residues (sequences shown in Table 1) were purchased from The Midland Certified Reagent Company Inc. DNA samples for EMSA experiments were labeled at 5΄ termini with 32P (25 (link)). Unincorporated [γ- 32P]ATP was removed by buffer exchange using Sephadex spin columns equilibrated with 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0 at 21°C). DNA duplexes were prepared by annealing purified 5΄-labeled oligonucleotides with slight excess of the complementary unlabeled strands. Single-stranded DNA concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically using extinction coefficients provided by the manufacturer. Negatively-supercoiled pUC19 plasmid DNA, was obtained from New England Biolabs. This preparation was relaxed with E. coli topoisomerase I, and individual topoisomers were resolved by electrophoresis in 1.4% agarose gels (24 (link)). Linking difference values (ΔLk) were assigned by band counting (26 (link)), using the relaxed circular form as a reference with ΔLk = 0. Isolated topoisomer DNAs were purified using a polymerase chain reaction Clean-up kit from Qiagen, followed by dialysis against buffer containing 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0 at 20°C), 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Plasmid DNA concentrations were measured spectrophotometrically, using ε260 = 1.31 × 104 M−1cm−1 (per base-pair).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptional Profiling of hNPC Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from differentiating hNPC plates was harvested in Trizol 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days following initiation of differentiation. RNA was then isolated using an RNA isolation kit (Ambion/mirVAna; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to kit protocol and samples were further purified with a cleanup kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to kit protocol. Purified RNA samples were then hybridized to Affymetrix GeneChip® Human Gene 1.0 ST Array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) to measure global gene expression in each sample. Expression data reflects replicate samples from 3 independent cell preparations, and the Bioconductor Limma package was utilized to normalize and annotate obtained expression data [54 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Purification of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differential centrifugation was used to isolate EVs from 38.5 mL of the voided urine samples and 500 µL of serum samples. Cells were initially removed from the urine samples by centrifugation at 2,000 ×g for 30 min, following which the supernatant was centrifuged at 17,000 ×g for 30 min to remove debris and salts. After further ultracentrifugation of the supernatant at 130,000 ×g for 90 min and washing with PBS, the pellets underwent additional ultracentrifugation at 130,000 ×g for 90 min. The final obtained pellet was resuspended in 250 µL PBS and then stored at −80 °C for subsequent use. Patients’ sera were centrifuged at 300 ×g for 10 min to remove remaining cells and cell debris. After further ultracentrifugation of the supernatant at 150,000 ×g for 70 min and washing with PBS, the pellets underwent additional ultracentrifugation at 150,000 ×g for 70 min. The final obtained pellet was resuspended in 100 µL PBS and then stored at −80 °C for subsequent use. MiRNA and mRNA were isolated with a miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands), Clean-up Kit (Qiagen), and RNA MS2 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturers’ protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standard PCR Amplification and Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify products between 300-800 base pairs for Sanger sequencing. Briefly, between 20-30ng of genomic DNA template and KAPA HiFi Hotstart DNA polymerase (KAPA Biosystems, Woburn MA) were used for amplification in a 30ul reaction as per the manufacturer's instructions. All forward and reverse primers were respectively designed to have M13F-41 (GGTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC) and M13R-27 (GGAAACAGCTATGACCATG) universal sequences at their 5-prime ends. PCR products were cleaned with a clean-up kit (Qiagen, Valencia CA or Bioneer Inc, Alameda CA) and sequenced at at SeqWright, LoneStar Sequencing (both Houston TX) or Eton Bioscience (San Diego CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tonsil-Derived FRCs and Bone Marrow MSCs Transcriptome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tonsil-derived FRCs from 3 donors (in-house) and bone marrow–derived MSCs from 3 donors (Lonza and expanded in-house) were grown in culture to P3 in the presence of hFGF (4 μg/ml) and harvested in logarithmic growth phase. Total RNA was extracted using an RNA extraction kit (Qiagen) and purified using a cleanup kit (Qiagen). Samples were quality tested using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 and the Agilent RNA 6000 nano kit. RIN numbers for all samples ranged from 9.5 to 10. Samples were then sent to BGI (Hong Kong) for library preparation and sequencing. Briefly, library preparation utilised poly-A enrichment followed by Ribozero depletion. Samples were run in a high-performance sequencing machine (Illumina) over 2 lanes, resulting in approximately 60 million reads per sample. Data were then trimmed for adapter sequences before analysis. Bioinformatics alignment and further analysis was done in-house using commercial software (Partek). For a visual representation of gene expression, TPM was used for normalisation. The heatmap was made using Morpheus (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus). Data are accessible at monash.figshare.com doi: 10.4225/03/5a2dae0c9b455.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microarray Analysis of Transcriptomic Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using a standard Trizol extraction protocol and purified with a cleanup kit (Qiagen). Affymetrix GeneChip Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (Affymetrix) arrays were used for microarray. Probe intensity (CEL) files were obtained, and Affymetrix Transcriptome Analysis Console software was used for array analysis. Differentially expressed genes were identified by the Robust Multichip Average method (45 (link)).
Gene set enrichment analysis v2.0 was used to determine the enrichment of functional categories in the entire linear gene expression dataset (46 (link)). GSEA was performed using MSigDB C2 CP: Canonical pathways gene set collection. Statistical significance was determined using 1,000 random permutations of each gene set to obtain a nominal p-value and false discovery rate. Heat map was generated using GenePattern (47 (link)). HeatmapViewer (v11) was used to display values in heat map format for the genes identified from GSEA analysis.
The microarray data have been deposited into the GEO database with the accession number GSE112119.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Characterization of Urinary Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs were isolated from 38.5 ml of voided urine samples by differential centrifugation. Urine samples were centrifuged at 2000 ×g for 30 min to remove contaminating cells. The supernatant then was ultracentrifuged at 17,000 ×g for 30 min to pellet dead cells and salts. The supernatant was further ultracentrifuged at 130,000 ×g for 90 min. The pellets were washed with PBS, and ultracentrifuged at 130,000 ×g for 90 min. The final pellet was resuspended in 250 μl PBS and stored at -80°C for subsequent applications.
To create artificial gross hematuria, we spiked 70 μl whole blood into each 38.5-ml sample of voided urine of HV to examine the effect of blood contamination.
The protein concentration of EVs was determined using DC protein assay kit (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA). CD9 intensity of EVs was measured by CD9 sandwich ELISA as described later. MiRNA was isolated using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands), RNA MS2 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and Clean-up Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mouse Genome Microarray Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using a standard Trizol extraction protocol and purified with a cleanup kit (Qiagen). A GeneChip Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Affymetrix array was used. Gene summary expression estimates were retrieved using Robust multi-array average (RMA) method from probe level data after back ground correction and quantile normalization with Partek software (http://www.r-project.org/). RMA and gene expression data were also independently obtained using Expression Console software from Affymetrix. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis60 (link),61 (link) was used for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Enrichment of Methylated DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methylated DNA was enriched from cell lysates (n = 2/condition) using the Methylminer assay (Active Motif). DNA was extracted from frozen cell pellets using the Genelute DNA Kit (Sigma). DNA was quantified and 2.0 μg was sonicated in 200 μl Tris EDTA buffer (1 × 30% 10 s, 2 × 20% 10 s, 4°C). Sheared DNA (2000 ng) was used as starting material for the pull down reaction according to manufacturer’s protocol. Following pull down, the DNA was size selected on a 1% agarose gel [200–500 base pair (bp) fragments] and extracted using a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) clean-up kit (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SNP Identification via PCR and Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fragments including the identified SNPs were amplified via PCR with specific primers outlined in Supplementary Data 4, PCR amplicons were then purified using a Qiagen PCR clean up kit and then sent for Sanger sequencing at GATC Ltd (Germany). Sequencing files were visualized and compared to wild-type using the Unipro UGENE software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!