The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using nanoparticle tracking analysis

1

Microparticle Quantification by NTA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microparticle preparations were diluted 1:10 with RPMI and stained with 10μl/sample PE Ly-6G (Clone: 1A8, BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (Nanosight, Malvern Instruments Ltd, Worcestershire, UK) was then used to enumerate NDMPs. Nanosight technology passes a laser through the sample liquid and both light scattering and Brownian motion are used to determine particle size and concentration in the sample by the NTA software. Unlike flow cytometry, which can only detect particles down to 300nm, NTA can detect particles ranging from 20nm-1000nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Characterization of BM-MSCs Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BM-MSCs-derived exosomes were collected and isolated following the protocol reported previously (23 (link)). Briefly, the BM-MSCs were cultured with serum-free DMEM. Then, the supernatants were centrifuged at 500 g for 10–12 min and collected. The supernatants were moved to new tubes and subjected to centrifuge at 12,000 g for 20–25 min. Furthermore, the supernatants were collected and subjected to ultra-centrifuge at 100,000 g for 2 h. Then, the supernatants were removed and the exosome pellets were placed in PBS solution. Partial of the exosomes were subjected to transmission electron microscope, Western blot. The size distribution was examined by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (Malvern Panalytical, Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lentiviral Knockdown of Rab27a in DU145 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, DU145 cells were plated in 48-well flat-bottomed plates at 18,000 cells/well. On day one, cells were infected with lentiviral particles, at a multiplicity of infection = 10, delivering Rab27a or non-mammalian control shRNA (SHCLNV; Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence of hexadimethrine bromide (8 mg/ml, H9268; Sigma-Aldrich). Puromycin (1.25 mg/ml, P9620, Sigma-Aldrich) was added on day 2. Media were changed on day 5, and cells were cultured in the presence of Puromycin for a further six passages prior to experimental use. Rab27a expression was quantified by qRT-PCR (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and expressed relative to the control cells. Exosome secretion was measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis (Nanosight, Malvern Instruments, Amesbury, UK) as described [15] and confirmed by immunofluorescence-based quantification of exosomes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Exosome Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells used for exosome isolation were grown in exosome-depleted FBS (System Biosciences; Mountain View, CA). Exosomes were isolated from cell culture media according to the manufacturers instructions using the Total Exosome Isolation (from cell culture media) reagent (Invitrogen-Life Technologies). Briefly, IMR32 cells were seeded at 1.25×105 cell /well in a 24 well plate, 24 hours after seeding cells were treated with either SFN, TBOOH, or DMSO for 24 ours. 48 hours after seeding (24 hours after adding treatment) the cell culture media was collected and centrifuged at 2000xG for 20 minutes and a final cell count was obtained (cell/ml) for each individual well. The cell-free supernatant containing the exosomes was transferred to a clean tube and 0.5 volumes of the Total Exosome Isolation reagent was added. Samples were thoroughly mixed and stored at 4°C overnight, and then finally samples were centrifuged at 10,000xG for 1 hour. Supernatant was discarded and the exosomes were resuspended in 50μL phosphate buffered saline. Samples were analyzed for exosomes (30-100nm) using a NanoSight and the Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). Exosome counts (particles/mL) were normalized to cell count (cells/ml) to obtain exosomes/cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Exosome Particle Size and Concentration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Particle size and concentration of isolated exosomes and negative controls were quantified using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (Malvern Instruments Ltd.; NanoSight NS300) as per manufacturer’s instructions at the Structural and Biophysical Core Facility, The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). NTA uses the properties of Brownian motion and light scattering to measure particle size and concentration (particles/mL) of EVs. The software tracks individual particles frame by frame and calculates particle size based on Stokes-Einstein equation [64 (link)]. A 1:700 dilution factor for bovine samples and a 1:300 dilution factor for human samples were used for the analysis. Standard curves ranging from 1:100 to 1:700 (v/v in 1X-filtered PBS) were run per species to determine the optimal dilution range for the exosomes (60–100 particles/frame). An absolute control of 1X-filtered PBS was also assessed to test for the purity of the reconstitute media. Settings: detection threshold of 8, camera level of 15, 3 replicates of 30 s captures, and a blue laser 488 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles from Biological Fluids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differential centrifugation and filtration methods were adapted for isolation of plasma microvesicles, exosomes, and small apoptotic bodies (sABs).15 ,16 (link) Briefly, blood collected using 3.8% sodium citrate solution was slowly centrifuged for 10 minutes (4°C; 300g). Then, 250 μL of plasma from mice and humans and 700 μL from rats, respectively, was centrifuged twice for 20 minutes (1500g; 4°C). Platelet-free plasma was either filtered (0.8 μm mesh) and centrifuged at 12 200g (40 minutes; 4°C) for isolation of microvesicles or 16 100g for 20 minutes for collection of microvesicles+sABs. In both cases, the pellet was either resuspended in PBS or RIPA (radioimmunoprecipitation assay) buffer and supernatant was filtered (0.2 μm mesh) and ultracentrifuged at 100 000g (60 minutes; 4°C) for exosome isolation. EVs were diluted in double-filtered PBS for determination of size and concentration by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NanoSight; Malvern Panalytical) or resuspended in RIPA buffer plus protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail for Western blot. EV morphology was assessed by transmission electronic microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Platelet-Derived Microvesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total and platelet derived microvesicle populations were isolated and quantified as previously described.18 (link),20 (link),21 (link) Briefly, whole blood from a cardiac puncture was anticoagulated with 10 % citrate and centrifuged at 450g for 10 minutes. The supernatant was subsequently collected and centrifuged again at 10,000g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The cell- and platelet-free supernatant was then diluted with Roswell Park Memorial Institute media and stained with CD41 antibody (0.2 mg/ml) (clone MWReg30, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA)). Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (Malvern Instruments Ltd, Worcestershire, United Kingdom) was then used to quantify total and CD41+ microvesicle concentrations. Microvesicles were quantified at 24 hours following injury based on previous work from our laboratory that demonstrated platelet derived microvesicles to be most elevated at this timepoint.20 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Liposome Characterization by NTA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liposome size and concentration were estimated by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis using a NanoSight instrument (Malvern), by acquiring three 1-min videos, each consisting of 25 frames s−1 at 25°C. Additional parameters: flow rate 20 µl min−1, camera level 16, detect threshold 5. Liposome size is reported as the mean of the mode in each of the three independent measurements ± standard error, liposome concentration is reported as mean ± standard error, data shown in electronic supplementary material, figure S2B refers to the average of three independent measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Quantification of Microvesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microvesicles were isolated as previously described19 . In brief, bronchoalveolar (BAL) fluid was collected from sham and post burn day 1 (PBD1) mice and centrifuged at 450 × g for 10 minutes at room temperature to form a cell pellet. Supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes at room temperature to remove any residual cells. Supernatant was then centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 30 minutes at room temperature to pellet MVs. MV pellets were re-suspended in 1 ml of Roswell Park Memorial Institute media (RPMI) and 1:100 MV dilutions were quantified using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (Nanosight, Malvern Instruments Ltd, Worcestershire, UK)22 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis of EV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and concentration of cell culture EV were measured using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis on a NanoSight NS300 (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, United Kingdom). BMDM EV samples were diluted 1:50 in 1 ml Ultrapure Endotoxin-free 0.1 M PBS to achieve a particle per frame value between 40 and 100. Samples were analysed under constant flow provided by a syringe pump set at a speed of 35 (equating to ∼ 3.1 μl/min; Gerritzen et al., 2017). A total of nine 30 s long videos were captured (camera setting: 14) for each sample. The detection threshold was set between 4 and 5 and was not altered between measurements of the same experiment. The concentration values, modal, and mean sizes were exported to Prism V9.2 (GraphPad Software, CA, United States) for statistical analysis and plotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!