The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using anti tcrαβ

1

Silencing CHMP5 in Jurkat T cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Jurkat cells were grown in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), 50 U ml−1 penicillin and 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. Jurkat T cells were infected with control shRNA lentiviral particles (sc-108080, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or CHMP5 shRNA (h) lentiviral particles (sc-60374-V, Santa Cruz) and selected based on the manufacturer's protocols. Control (Ctrl) Jurkat and CHMP5KD Jurkat cells were maintained and grown in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich), 50 U ml−1 penicillin, 4–8 μg ml−1 puromycin and 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. The antibodies used were anti-CHMP5 (Abcam, Cambridge, CO, USA), anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-TCRαβ (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), anti-CD3 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD28 (BioLegend), anti-TCRβ (Abcam), anti-pho-PKCθ (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-PKCθ (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-pho-IKKαβ (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-IKKα (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-pho-ZAP-70 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-ZAP-70 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-pho-Lck (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-Lck (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Immune Cell Profiling by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MLNLs (500,000 cells/tube) were stained using mouse anti-rat monoclonal antibodies conjugated to FITC, phycoerythrin (PE), peridinin-chlorophyll-protein (PerCP), allophycocyanin (APC) or APC-cyanine (Cy)7. The antibodies used herein were anti-TCRαβ, anti-CD8α, anti-CD4, anti-TCRγδ and anti-CD45RA (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). Cells were mixed with PBS containing 2% FBS and 1% NaN3 and stained, as previously described [28 (link)]. The data were acquired with a Gallios™ Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA) in the CCiT-UB and assessed by the Flowjo v10 software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). Results are expressed as percentages of positive cells in the lymphocyte population, selected according to their forward-scatter characteristics (FSC) and side-scatter characteristics (SSC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry analysis, lymphocytes (2 × 105) from spleens and MLNs were labeled with mouse anti-rat monoclonal antibodies (mAb) conjugated to FITC, phycoerythrin (PE), peridinin-chlorophyll-a protein (PercP), allophycocyanin (APC), or BD Horizon™ BV421, as in previous studies [21 (link),22 (link)]. In this case, the mAb used were anti-CD4, anti-CD8α, anti-CD8β, anti-TCRαβ, anti-NKR-P1A, anti-TCRγδ, and anti-CD45RA (BD Biosciences, San Diego, USA). After staining with standard procedures [21 (link)], analyses were performed using a GalliosTM Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA) at the CCiT-UB. All results were assessed by the FlowJo v.10 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometric Phenotyping of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following conjugated antibodies were used for flow cytometric phenotyping and analysis: anti-CD34, anti-CD43, anti-KDR, anti-CD45, anti-CD7, anti-CD5, anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD3, antiTCRαβ, anti-CD56, anti-CD15, anti-CD14, and anti-CD235a purchased from BD Biosciences. All antibodies were used in a 1:30 dilution. Dead cells were excluded from analysis in all experiments by staining with DAPI. Flow cytometry analysis was conducted on an LSRII cytometer (BD Biosciences, Paris, France), a FACS CANTO (BD Biosciences, Paris, France), or a FACS CELESTA (BD Biosciences, Paris, France) and analyzed using FlowJo software (BD Biosciences, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multicolor Flow Cytometry of Gut Lymphocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometric analysis, 5x105 PPL, IEL and LPL were labelled with mouse anti-rat monoclonal antibodies conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), phycoerythrin (PE), peridininchlorophylla protein (PerCP) or allophycocyanin (APC). The antibodies used were anti-CD4, anti-CD8α, anti-CD8β, anti-TCRαβ, anti-TCRγδ, anti-NKR-P1A, anti-CD25 (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK), anti-CD62L, anti-CD103 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and anti-TLR4 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA). The cells were stained as previously described [19 (link)]. Briefly, lymphocytes were incubated with saturating amounts of antibodies in PBS-0.2% FBS-0.1% NaN3 (darkness, 20 min, 4 °C). Consecutively, the cells were washed, and fixed with 0.5% p-formaldehyde (darkness, until analysis, 4 °C). A negative control staining was included in each cell sample. Analyses were performed with a Gallios Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA) in the Scientific and Technological Centres of the University of Barcelona (CCiTUB).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Flow Cytometric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometric analysis, splenocytes (2 × 105) were labelled with mouse anti-rat monoclonal antibodies (mAb) conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), phycoerythrin (PE), peridininchlorophylla protein (PercP), allophycocyanin (APC) or APC-Cyanine (Cy)7, as in previous studies60 (link). In this case, the antibodies used were anti-CD4, anti-CD8α, anti-CD8β, anti-TCRαβ, anti-TCRγδ, anti-NKR-P1A, anti-CD25, anti-CD45RA (BD Biosciences, San Diego, USA), anti-CD62L, anti-CD103 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-TLR-4 (Novus Biologicals, Littlon, CO, USA) and anti-Foxp3 (eBioscience). After staining with standard procedures20 (link), analyses were performed using a GalliosTM Cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL, USA) at the CCiT-UB. All results were assessed by the Flowjo v.10 software (TreeStar, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Lymphocyte Subtyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IEL (2 × 105) were stained with anti-rat monoclonal antibodies (mAb) conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), phycoerythrin (PE), peridininchlorophylla protein (PercP), allophycocyanin (APC) or APC-cyanine (Cy)7, as in previous studies (24 (link)). In this case, the mAb used were anti-CD4, anti-CD8α, anti-CD8β, anti-TCRαβ, anti-TCRγδ, anti-NKR-P1A, anti-CD25, anti-CD45RA (BD Biosciences, San Diego, USA), anti-CD62L, and anti-CD103 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA). After standard procedures (20 (link)), samples were analyzed using a GalliosTM Cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL, USA) in the Scientific and Technological Centers of the University of Barcelona (CCiT-UB). The results were assessed by FlowJo version 10 software (TreeStar, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). Lymphocyte subsets were defined as follows: Th (TCRαβ+ NKR-P1A CD4+) cells; Tc TCRαβ+ (TCRαβ+ NKR-P1A CD8+) cells; Tc TCRγδ+ (TCRγδ+ CD8+) cells; natural killer (NK) (NKR-P1A+ TCRαβ) cells; NKT (NKR-P1A+ TCRαβ+) cells; CD4+ (CD4+ CD8) cells; CD8+ (CD4 CD8+) cells; CD8αα+ (CD8α+ CD8β); CD8αβ+ (CD8α+ CD8β+). Results are expressed as percentages of positive cells in the lymphocyte population selected according to their forward-scatter cells (FSC) and side-scatter characteristics (SSC) or in a particular selected population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!