The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using index screen

1

Protein crystallization and optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystal screening was done at room temperature by the sitting-drop vapor diffusion method using 96-well plates (Greiner) and a range of commercial screens. A Mosquito nanolitre robot (TTP Labtech) was used to set up 200 nl sitting drops.
Crystals of untagged fibromodulin were obtained from a 10 mg/ml protein solution after one month at condition C6 of the Wizard Classic 3 screen (Rigaku) and at condition G5 of the Index screen (Hampton Research), but these crystals did not diffract to high resolution when cryoprotected with 30% glycerol. A range of crystallisation conditions and cryoprotectants were screened. The best results were obtained by growing the crystals at 26% (w/v) PEG 3350, 200 mM lithium sulphate monohydrate, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) and using an additional 15% PEG 3350 as cryoprotectant.
The chondroadherin-AB31 complex crystallised under a wide range of conditions at acidic pH, but the crystals were later found to contain only chondroadherin. When tested, chondroadherin alone crystallised under the same conditions. The best crystals grew from a 10 mg/ml protein solution in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2 using 200 mM monobasic potassium phosphate (pH 4.8), 20% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 3350 as precipitant. Crystals were harvested in reservoir solution supplemented with 20% ethylene glycol and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

NmGHR Protein Crystallization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NmGHR crystallization conditions were screened using protein concentrated up to 6.6 mg/mL in 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 3.5 M NaCl. Best diffracting crystal was obtained from the Index Screen (Hampton Research) using the Phoenix crystallization robot (Art Robbins). Crystals appeared at 21°C in a droplet formed by mixing equal volumes (0.5 μL) of the protein solution, and reservoir solution, containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 25% w/v, 0.1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.5 and 0.2 M lithium sulfate. Crystal was cryoprotected by increasing the PEG 3350 concentration up to 30% w/v before flash-freezing. Data were collected at the ID23-2 beamline of ESRF synchrotron (Grenoble, Fr), at a wavelength of 0.873 Å. Data were processed using XDS (Kabsch, 2010 (link)), Pointless and Aimless (Winn et al., 2011 (link)). Final statistics are reported in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structure Determination of mitoNEET

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified mitoNEET protein (20 mg/ml) mixed with an equal molar concentration of furosemide was screened by sitting drop vapor diffusion against Index screen (Hampton Research). Red crystals formed in under a week in several conditions. Final data collection was performed using crystals grown by sitting drop vapor diffusion by mixing a 1:1 ratio of protein with 60% v/v Tacsimate pH 7.0. The mother liquor was used for cryoprotection. Data collection was performed on the Northeastern Collaborative Access Team beamline 24-ID-C at the Advanced Photon Source at the iron peak. Data were indexed, integrated, and scaled using iMOSFLMand Aimless. To avoid model bias molecular replacement was combined with anomalous signals (MR-SAD) using Phaser and PDB 3REE as the search model15 (link). Refinement was performed using phenix27 . Model building/rebuilding was performed using Coot28 (link). OMIT maps were constructed by removing the ligand from the final refined structure file, performing three macro-cycles of refinement with simulated annealing, and calculating a |Fo|—|Fc| map with phenix.maps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Structure Determination of mitoNEET

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified mitoNEET protein (20 mg/ml) mixed with an equal molar concentration of furosemide was screened by sitting drop vapor diffusion against Index screen (Hampton Research). Red crystals formed in under a week in several conditions. Final data collection was performed using crystals grown by sitting drop vapor diffusion by mixing a 1:1 ratio of protein with 60% v/v Tacsimate pH 7.0. The mother liquor was used for cryoprotection. Data collection was performed on the Northeastern Collaborative Access Team beamline 24-ID-C at the Advanced Photon Source at the iron peak. Data were indexed, integrated, and scaled using iMOSFLMand Aimless. To avoid model bias molecular replacement was combined with anomalous signals (MR-SAD) using Phaser and PDB 3REE as the search model15 (link). Refinement was performed using phenix27 . Model building/rebuilding was performed using Coot28 (link). OMIT maps were constructed by removing the ligand from the final refined structure file, performing three macro-cycles of refinement with simulated annealing, and calculating a |Fo|—|Fc| map with phenix.maps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Crystallization of 10-23 DNAzyme-Asfv PolX Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10-23 DNAzyme crystallization oligo was resuspended to a concentration of 1 mM in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2 and introduced to Asfv PolX (13 mg/mL) in a 1:1 volumetric ratio with a final volume of 120 µl. 4 M NaCl was added to the sample at 1 ul increments until the sample became free of any precipitation. 10-23 DNAzyme-Asfv PolX complex was screened by sitting drop vapor diffusion against Index screen (Hampton Research) at 22 °C. Crystals formed in around 2 weeks. Final conditions were 0.2 M MgCl2, 0.1 M HEPES (pH 7.5), and 25% PEG-3350. Long rod crystals were cryoprotected using the crystallization solution supplemented with 30% ethylene glycol before being flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Data acquisition was performed on NE-CAT 24-IDE beam line at the Advanced Photon Source (APS) at Argonne National Laboratories.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Crystallization and Structure Determination of pnGFP1.5-Y.Cro

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initial crystallization screens were carried out in Axygen 96-Well Sitting-Drop Crystallography Plate using the TTP Labtech Mosquito (TTP Labtech, Cambridge, MA). The screen conditions were PEG/Ion, PEG/Ion II, and the Index screen from Hampton Research (Aliso Viejo, CA). Large single crystals of pnGFP1.5-Y.Cro were obtained after optimization of condition 14 of PEG/Ion to 20% w/v polyethylene glycol 3350, 0.25 M Potassium thiocyanate, and 1 M Tris•HCl (pH 8). The cryoprotectant was 20% ethylene glycol in the crystal mother liquor. Diffraction data from two crystals were collected on Beamline 5.0.1 at the ALS (Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA). The structure was solved by molecular replacement from wild-type GFP (starting model PDB ID 1EMB), followed by model building and crystallographic refinement using the programs HKL2000, CCP4, EPMR, Coot, and Phenix.41 (link)-46 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Crystallization Screening of PNGase and GH92

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
B035DRAFT_03341PNGase and B035DRAFT_03340GH92 were initially screened using commercial kits (Molecular Dimensions, Qiagen, and Hampton Research). The protein concentrations were 20 mg/mL. The drops, composed of 0.1 or 0.2 µL of protein solution plus 0.1 µL of reservoir solution, were set up in a mosquito crystallization robot (SPT Labtech). The sitting drop method was used and the plates were incubated at 20 °C. The crystallization condition for B035DRAFT_03340PNGase was condition B12 in JCSG screen part I (Qiagen). B035DRAFT_03341GH92 was condition E12 in Index screen (Hampton Research). The samples were cryoprotected with the addition of 20% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 400 to the crystallization condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Crystallization of TraN-DNA Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression and purification of TraN was performed as described in (16 (link)). TraN was set up for co-crystallization with double-stranded (ds) oligonucleotides. The ds-oligonucleotides were ordered as desalted ss-oligonucleotides and annealed by heating up equimolar amounts to 95°C for 10 min, followed by slow cooling down to room temperature (RT). The DNA represents the 34 bp binding site as described in (16 (link)) with blunt ends. In all setups, TraN was used with a protein stock concentration of 1.85 mg/ml and premixed with the DNA at a molar ratio of 1.1:1. The plates had a drop volume of 1 μl with a drop ratio of 50% (v/v). Crystals from TraN set up with DNA were harvested from the Index screen (Hampton research) condition 88 (0.2 M ammonium citrate tribasic pH 7.0; 20% (w/v) PEG-3350).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Crystallization of SpNanA-Neu5Ac9N3en Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystals of SpNanA-Neu5Ac9N32en complex were grown by the sitting-drop, vapor-diffusion method. Before crystallization, the purified protein (~5 mg/mL) was incubated with 5 mM of Neu5Ac9N32en for 30 min. Screening of crystallization conditions was performed using sitting-drop vapor diffusion in 96-well plates (Hampton Research) at 291 K by mixing 2 μ L of the protein solution with 2 μ L of the reagent solution from the sparse matrix Crystal Screens 1 and 2, and Index Screen (Hampton Research). The best crystals were grown from a reservoir solution containing Tris-HCl (pH 8.5, 100 mM), lithium sulfate (0.2 M), 25% PEG3350. Crystals were plate- shaped and took 2–3 days to reach a maximal length of 0.05 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Crystallization Using Commercial Screens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All protein samples were concentrated to 8 mg/ml in the 0.5× PBS buffer. The commercial crystallization kits including Index Screen (Hampton Research, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA), JCSG Core Suites (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and Top96 (Anatrace, Maumee, OH, USA) were used for initial crystal sorting. The screening for crystallization conditions was set up with a Formulatrix NT8 robot using the sitting drop vapor diffusion technique in INTELLI-PLATE 96 Well (Art Robbins Instruments) in the Longwood Center for Structural and Chemical Biology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. For each condition, 0.1 μl of protein and 0.1 μl of crystallization formulation were mixed; then the mixture was equilibrated against 50 μl of the crystallization solution in each reservoir well.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!