The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

1.5 tesla mri

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The 1.5 Tesla MRI is a medical imaging device that uses a strong magnetic field and radio waves to generate detailed images of the body's internal structures. It is capable of producing high-resolution images of organs, tissues, and other anatomical features, which can be used for diagnostic and treatment purposes by healthcare professionals.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using 1.5 tesla mri

1

Quantitative Lumbar Spine MRI Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All individuals were evaluated by MRI, including T1- and T2-weighted axial and sagittal sections of the lumbar spine (T12–S1) and a screening MRI T2-weighted sagittal imaging of the whole spine (1.5 Tesla MRI; Siemens, Munich, Germany). All MRIs were performed according to the standard clinical imaging protocol of each site. All MRI images were viewed using the Advantage Workstation ver. 4.3 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA), and quantitative measurements were obtained using the digital measuring tools included in the software. Four independent evaluators (I.B.A., H.Y., M.Y.S., and A.G.A.) made quantitative measurements of MRI images using a standardized protocol, and a consensus was negotiated in case of disagreements (Y.K.). Before conducting the measurements, all evaluators underwent training to ensure similar measurement technique. Following training, each evaluator was tested on the same set of five MRI studies to determine interrater reliability (κ=0.82).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Whole Spine MRI and ldCT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used baseline MRI data, and baseline plus 2-year ldCT data from the whole spine (C3–L5). A standardised protocol was applied in both centres for imaging acquisitions.18 (link) MRI images were acquired in Leiden and Herne, respectively, on a 3 Tesla MRI (Philips Medical systems, Best, The Netherlands) and 1.5 Tesla MRI (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using sagittal T1-weighted and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences with a slice thickness of 3 mm. LdCT images were obtained on 64-section and 16-section CT scanners (Leiden: Aquilion 64, Toshiba Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan; Herne: Somatom Emotion 16, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Spiral CT scans were performed using automatic exposure control. The effective dose estimates for the whole spine were 3.8 (2.6) mSv and 4.7 (2.4) mSv per ldCT, respectively—further details were previously published.18 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

MARS MRI Protocol for Joint Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MARS MRI was planned before discharge and after 4 and 12 months. Some participants did not attend all MARS MRI appointments, and there was a variation in time for the examinations (Table 1). In Odense MARS MRI was performed with Philips 1.5T Achieva scanners (Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). No contrast agent was administered. The following sequences were performed: coronal STIR, T2W and T1W, and axial T2W and T1W. For some patients axial STIR was also performed. In Malmö MARS MRI was performed using a Siemens 1.5 Tesla MRI. Dotarem (279.3 mg/mL, Guerbet, France), a gadolinium containing contrast agent, was administered intravenously (0.2 mL/kg bodyweight). Before Dotarem was administered the following sequences were performed using view-angle tilting (VAT) for artifact reduction: coronal T1 (Figure 2), coronal STIR (Figure 3), axial T1, and sagittal T2. After Dotarem was administered, axial T1 was performed and axial subtraction images were obtained. Both MRI scanners used commercially available standard sequences for metal artifact reduction, utilizing high bandwidth.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Lumbar Spine Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Radiographs of the lumbar spine in flexion and extension views were taken to rule
out segmental instability. Disc herniation was confirmed by 1.5 Tesla MRI
(Siemens), and type of herniation (Extrusion, Protrusion, and Sequestration),
level, and location were noted. Preoperative T1 and T2 weighted MRI sequences
were assessed for the presence of Modic changes and were classified into Type 1
(hypo-intense signal in T1 and hyper-intense signal in T2) and Type 2
(hyper-intense signal in T1 and iso-intense or slightly increased signal in T2).
Location of the Modic change in relation to endplate was noted as entire,
central, anterior, or posterior. Disc degeneration (DD) was graded using the
Modified Pfirrmann scale,15 (link)
and endplate damage was assessed by Total endplate score (TEPS).16 (link)
Computed Tomography (CT) scan was done in selected patients with endplate
erosions in MRI. A senior musculoskeletal radiologist reported all findings of
MRI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!