The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Micropolish 2

Manufactured by Buehler

Micropolish II is a fine aluminum oxide polishing compound used for the preparation of metallographic samples. It is designed to provide a high-quality, scratch-free surface finish on a variety of materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 protocols using micropolish 2

1

Preparation of Electrochemical Electrode Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2 mm thick
GC (Alfa Aesar, Type1) electrodes were polished prior
to use for 1 min each with Buehler Micropolish II deagglomerated alumina
in decreasing particle size from 1.0 to 0.3 to 0.05 μm. In between,
the electrodes were sonicated for 15 min each in 18 MΩ water
(MQ water) and isopropanol (VWR Chemicals).
Electrochemical
treatment of GC was performed by sweeping the potential in a 0.5 M
H2SO4 solution between +1500 and −1000
mV vs Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) at a scan rate of 50 mV s–1 for 30 cycles.
To prepare Cr-/Au-coated glass electrodes for
spectroscopy, glass
slides were cut into the size of 0.7 × 6.0 cm and subsequently
cleaned via sonication in the following solvents
for 15 min each: acetone (VWR Chemicals), 2% Hellmanex solution (Hellma-Analytics),
MQ water, and isopropanol. Afterward, the samples were treated for
5 min at 50 W in the oxygen plasma oven Plasma ETCH P25. In a thermal
metal evaporation chamber, 5 nm chromium followed by 80 nm of gold
was deposited at ∼10–6 mbar.
Toray
CP (Alfa Aesar, TGP-H 60) was used as received and cut into
an appropriate size of 1.0 × 3.0 cm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bis-Acryl Resin Provisional Material Fabrication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty specimens of the bis‐acryl composite resin provisional material Protemp 4 Garant (3 M ESPE) were fabricated in the shape of premolars by means of a rubber mold of a natural premolar tooth. After the mold had set, the bis‐acryl provisional material was injected into the mold and allowed to set. After setting, the specimens were removed from the mold and embedded in chemically cured dental acrylic. Then the specimens were ground with water coolant SiC papers up to 2000grit in a grinding/polishing machine (Polo250/3, Jean Wirtz) and polished with a polishing paste of (Buehler, Micropolish II, Lake Bluff, Ill), 1 and 0.05 μm particle size. All surfaces were sanblasted with airborne alumina particles (50 μm) for 10 s from a distance of 10 mm employing 0.55 MPa propulsion pressure (Microetcher ER, Danville Engineering Inc). The specimens were then equally divided between two groups (PM‐C and PM‐MP) and brackets were bonded by the two different bonding procedures as described previously for tooth specimens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!