The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Q150t turbo pumped sputter coater

Manufactured by Quorum Technologies
Sourced in United Kingdom, Canada

The Q150T Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater is a laboratory equipment designed for the deposition of thin films on various substrates. The core function of the Q150T is to sputter coat samples with a thin, uniform layer of conductive material, such as gold or platinum, to enhance their surface conductivity for subsequent analysis or imaging using techniques like scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using q150t turbo pumped sputter coater

1

High-Resolution SEM Imaging of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tissue samples were sputter-coated with 3 n m of platinum in high-resolution Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater Q150T (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK) before their examination under FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 field emission gun scanning electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brno, Czech Republic). The Navigation Montage option of the SEM software, v. 6.3.4.3233 (Helios NanoLab, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Brno, Czech Republic) was used to map whole tissue sections at low resolution. Final SEM analyses were performed at acceleration voltage ranging from 2 kV to 5 kV and spot size 3 using Everhart–Thornley Detector (ETD), Circular Backscatter Detector (CBS), and Through the Lens Detector (TLD). If specimen charging was experienced, a beam deceleration mode combined with the magnetic immersion final lens [31 (link),32 (link),33 (link)] was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immune Cells Ultrastructural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Control and TiO2NPs-exposed immune cells (1 μg mL−1 final concentration, 24 h of exposure) that adhered to 12 mm circular glass coverslips (Menzel Gläser, Germany) were fixed with a 1:1 mixture of 6% glutaraldehyde in 100 mM cacodylate buffer and ASW (pH 8–8.5) for 1 h at RT. Coverslips were washed three times with cacodylate buffer, dehydrated through an ethanol series (25, 50, 75, 90, 96, and 100%), and dried in a K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK). The dried coverslips were sputter coated with 3 nm platinum using high-resolution Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater Q150T (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK). The samples were examined in FEI Nova NanoSEM scanning electron microscope (FEI, Czech Republic) at 5 kV using CBS and TLD detectors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Platinum Sputter-Coated 3D Constructs SEM Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 3D constructs were sputter-coated (Turbo Pumped Sputter Coater Q 150T, Quorum, UK) with platinum at 20 mA for 120 s. The image was acquired by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S-4300SE, HITACHI, Korea) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and 300 × magnificent. 50 pores in each sample were selected randomly and microscopic pore size was calculated with Image J.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples removed from the dual culture were fixed (3% glutaraldehyde, 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) for 48–96 h at 4 °C. They were centrifuged (14,300× g, 5 min, room temperature), and the sediment was resuspended in 500 µL of 3% glutaraldehyde and fixed overnight. After fixation, the samples were centrifuged again (12,000× g, 5 min, room temperature) and washed with cacodylate buffer (20 min, three times). The cells were sedimented onto poly-L-lysine-treated glass coverslips for 24 h at 4 °C. The coverslips were then washed with double-distilled water at room temperature, post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h, washed again with ddH2O (20 min, three times), dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and absolute acetone, and critical-point dried (K850, Quorum Technologies Ltd., Ringmer, UK). The dried coverslips were mounted onto aluminum specimen stubs using Wire Glue (Anders Products, Andover, MA, USA) and sputter-coated with 3 nm of platinum in a high-resolution Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater Q150T (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Ringmer, UK). The samples were examined using an FEI Nova NanoSEM scanning electron microscope (FEI, Brno, Czech Republic) at 3 or 5 kV using Everhart–Thornley Detector (ETD), Circular Backscatter Detector (CBS), and Through the Lens Detector (TLD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Detailed SEM Imaging of Silicone Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron micrographs (SEM, Zeiss Leica, Jena, Germany) of the silicone surfaces facilitated a detailed view of the distribution of pores and their variety in pore size and morphology. For SEM preparation, the samples were placed on metal stubs and sputtered with gold for one minute using a Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater Q150T (Quorum Technologies, Laughton, United Kingdom). SEM analysis was then performed using a magnification of 500 fold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative SEM Analysis of AMNP Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AMNP0, AMNP1, and AMNP2 particles were assessed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). AMNP0 (3 mg) was secured onto a carbon based adhesive substrate and positioned on a specimen stage, while powder samples (3 mg) of AMNP1 and AMNP2 were dispersed in 10 mL of ethanol prior analysis. From each dispersion, 10 µL was placed on separate SEM pin stubs and left to air dry. The samples were sputter-coated with 20 nm of gold for 180 s under argon using a Quorum Q150T Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater (Essex, UK). AMNP0 was imaged using a JEOL JSM-6301F instrument (Welwyn Garden City, UK), whilst AMNP1 and AMNP2 were imaged using a Quanta 200 FEG ESEM (OR, USA). All images were collected with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Scaffold Microstructural Analysis via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After immunofluorescence analysis of the seeded scaffolds after 28 days of myogenic differentiation, microstructural analysis of the scaffolds was performed using an Auriga Fib-scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) as described previously [4 (link)]. Probes were sputter-coated with gold using a Q150T Turbo-pumped Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies Inc., Guelph, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bacterial Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were cultivated in small-scale under conditions described in Table 1. A volume corresponding approximately to 2 × 109 CFU was pelleted (6000 × g, 15 min, 4°C) and washed twice in 100 mM sodium cacodylate/5 g/L NaCl, pH 7.2. Bacteria were then fixed by 3% glutaraldehyde in the same buffer at RT for 1 h and then at 4°C overnight with slow rotation. Sterility of the fixed solution was checked by aliquot plating. The washed bacterial cells were then allowed to sediment overnight onto poly-L-lysine treated circular coverslips at 4°C. The coverslips with attached bacteria were post-fixed with 1% OsO4 for 1 h at room temperature and three times washed with ddH2O. Washed coverslips with the bacteria were dehydrated through an alcohol series (25, 50, 75, 90, 96, 100, and 100%) followed by absolute acetone and critical point dried from liquid CO2 in a K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd.). The dried samples were sputter coated with 3 nm of platinum in a Q150T Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd.). The final samples were examined in a FEI Nova NanoSEM 450 scanning electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 5 kV using CBS and TLD detectors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 for 2 h at RT, followed by rinsing with 0.1 M PBS two times. Cells were dehydrated by passing through a series of ethanol solutions, starting at 50% and sequentially incubating in 75%, 80%, 90%, 96%, and 100% ethanol for 5 min, twice repeating each step. The dehydrated cells were incubated twice for 30 min in hexamethyldisilazane. Cells were air dried overnight, coated with chromium for 20 min using a Q150T Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies) and then imaged with Supra 50 VP LEO (LEO Carl Zeiss SMT Ltd) scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Placental Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of intact and denuded HAM scaffolds (from two placentas) mounted in a CellCrown™ inserts (Scaffdex Oy, Tampere, Finland) were fixed in PBS buffered 3% glutaraldehyde, washed in PBS, postfixed with 1% OsO4, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (25, 50, 75, 90, 96, and 100%) and critical point dried in a K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK). The dried samples were sputter-coated with 3 nm of platinum in a Q150T Turbo-Pumped Sputter Coater (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Ringmer, UK). The final samples were examined in a FEI Nova NanoSEM scanning electron microscope (FEI, Brno, Czech Republic) at 5 kV using ETD, CBS and TLD detectors. Stereo-pair images were taken at tilts of -6°, 0° and +6° of compucentric goniometer stage. Final R-GB anaglyphs were constructed in a “Stereo module” of AnalySis3.2 software suite (EMSIS GmbH, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!