p-values less than 0.05 being considered statistically significant.
Statistical package social sciences
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) is a software application for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of functions for data manipulation, analysis, and visualization. SPSS is designed to work with structured data and is commonly used in the social sciences and other fields that require quantitative analysis.
Lab products found in correlation
9 protocols using statistical package social sciences
Statistical Analysis of Categorical and Numerical Data
p-values less than 0.05 being considered statistically significant.
Cardiorespiratory and Heart Rate Variability Analysis
To compare the effect of the active tilt test on the cardiorespiratory parameters and HRV indices, considering groups and moments, analysis of variance for repeated measures was used. Possible differences were identified by the Bonferroni post-hoc test. The effect size was calculated using Eta-squared (small effect: > 0.01 to < 0.06; moderate effect: ≥ 0.06 to < 0.14; high effect: ≥ 0.14). The level of significance adopted was < 5% and the statistical software used was the Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), version 15.0.
Analyzing Playoff Performance in Sports
The assumption of normality was verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to establish differences between the 3 weeks leading up to the playoffs, the week of playoffs, and the week after playoffs. The Bonferroni post hoc comparison was used to establish significant differences between means. The magnitude of the effect was assessed by calculating the Cohen
d(ES),
15
and rated as trivial (<0.2), small (0.2–0.49), moderate (0.5–0.8), or large (>0.8). The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (
r) was calculated to evaluate the relationship between variables. Statistical significance was set at
p < 0.05 and the statistical treatment was conducted using Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) version 22.0.
Evaluating Autonomic Dysfunction in Olfactory Disorders
Data were examined using the Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) software for windows 8, version 21.0. Data were analyzed as a whole, and whether the patient has subjective OD or not (s̅OD). Normality and homogeneity tests and parametric analyses were used in the descriptive statistics. The Student T-test was used to compare COMPASS-31 overall total weighted score (TWS) and controls. The Pearson chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used to analyze categorical variables. Generalized Linear Models, according to the distribution of the dependent variable (gamma and Poisson log-linear), were used to obtain COMPASS-31 scores, with OD as the independent variable. Logistic binary regression, with OD as the predictor, was used to compare the magnitude of the risk factors (odds ratio, OR) in a few neurological symptoms. The results are presented as means ± standard deviation and percentages (%). The significant level considered was
p < 0.05.
Adherence Comparison in Hospitals
Evaluating Intervention Outcomes Through Statistical Analysis
The Mann-Whitney test compared quantitative variables from independent groups. The Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test assessed the association between qualitative variables.
The McNemar test evaluated the degree of flexion frequencies before and after the intervention.
We adopted a 5% significance level for all hypothesis tests and performed the analyses using the statistical software Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) for Windows, v.25. Result presentation followed the study objectives:
Analyzing Dental Occlusal Wear Patterns
Detailed Cardiac Function Analysis
Detailed Comparative Analysis Protocol
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!