The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistical package social sciences

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) is a software application for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of functions for data manipulation, analysis, and visualization. SPSS is designed to work with structured data and is commonly used in the social sciences and other fields that require quantitative analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

9 protocols using statistical package social sciences

1

Statistical Analysis of Categorical and Numerical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data obtained from the present study were expressed as number (N) and percentages (%) or as mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test while numerical variables were compared using the t-test. All statistical procedures were executed using the Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), version 25.0, with
p-values less than 0.05 being considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cardiorespiratory and Heart Rate Variability Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The normality of the data was tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test. For the sample characterization, the descriptive statistical method was used, and the results were presented as means and standard deviations (SD) for parametric data, median and interquartile range for non-parametric data, and absolute numbers and frequency for categorical data. The comparison of the sample profile, cardiorespiratory parameters, and HRV indices between groups, at rest, was made using the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney test. For the categorical data, the chi-square test was performed, considering the Yates continuity correction for 2 × 2 cross tables. The Cohen d effect size was calculated, and values over 0.2 and under 0.5 were considered as having small effect, between 0.5 and 0.8 a moderate effect, and higher than 0.8 a high effect.
To compare the effect of the active tilt test on the cardiorespiratory parameters and HRV indices, considering groups and moments, analysis of variance for repeated measures was used. Possible differences were identified by the Bonferroni post-hoc test. The effect size was calculated using Eta-squared (small effect: > 0.01 to < 0.06; moderate effect: ≥ 0.06 to < 0.14; high effect: ≥ 0.14). The level of significance adopted was < 5% and the statistical software used was the Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), version 15.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing Playoff Performance in Sports

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The assumption of normality was verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to establish differences between the 3 weeks leading up to the playoffs, the week of playoffs, and the week after playoffs. The Bonferroni post hoc comparison was used to establish significant differences between means. The magnitude of the effect was assessed by calculating the Cohen
d(ES),
15
and rated as trivial (<0.2), small (0.2–0.49), moderate (0.5–0.8), or large (>0.8). The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (
r) was calculated to evaluate the relationship between variables. Statistical significance was set at
p < 0.05 and the statistical treatment was conducted using Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) version 22.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Autonomic Dysfunction in Olfactory Disorders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Data were examined using the Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) software for windows 8, version 21.0. Data were analyzed as a whole, and whether the patient has subjective OD or not (s̅OD). Normality and homogeneity tests and parametric analyses were used in the descriptive statistics. The Student T-test was used to compare COMPASS-31 overall total weighted score (TWS) and controls. The Pearson chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used to analyze categorical variables. Generalized Linear Models, according to the distribution of the dependent variable (gamma and Poisson log-linear), were used to obtain COMPASS-31 scores, with OD as the independent variable. Logistic binary regression, with OD as the predictor, was used to compare the magnitude of the risk factors (odds ratio, OR) in a few neurological symptoms. The results are presented as means ± standard deviation and percentages (%). The significant level considered was
p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Adherence Comparison in Hospitals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were managed and analyzed in Statistical Package Social Sciences (version 22 IBM, California, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the extent of adherence and t-tests were performed to analyze the mean difference between private and public hospitals for each of the core element mentioned earlier with a p value < 0.05 considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Intervention Outcomes Through Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient characteristics were presented as absolute and relative frequencies (for qualitative variables), and mean, median, standard deviation (SD), minimum, maximum, as well as first- and third-quartile values.
The Mann-Whitney test compared quantitative variables from independent groups. The Pearson chi-square or Fisher exact test assessed the association between qualitative variables.
The McNemar test evaluated the degree of flexion frequencies before and after the intervention.
We adopted a 5% significance level for all hypothesis tests and performed the analyses using the statistical software Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp. Armonk, NY, USA) for Windows, v.25. Result presentation followed the study objectives:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Dental Occlusal Wear Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were compiled systematically in Microsoft Excel Worksheet and analyzed using Statistical Package Social Sciences (SPSS version 21, IBM, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated. Bivariate analysis (Chi-square/ Fisher's exact tests and independent t-tests) was performed to determine the empirical relationship between each independent variable and outcome. In addition, binary logistic regressions were used to measure the relationship between the independent variables and each of the dependent variables: Occlusal wear, tooth wear grades 0, I, II, III, and IV. The independent variables with the p-value that was less than 0.10 from the bivariate analysis were included in the logistic regression. Forward (Wald) selection procedures were used to obtain the final models. Statistical significance level was set to 0.05 for the logistic regression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Detailed Cardiac Function Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data is expressed as mean ± SEM of at least three experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using Social Sciences Statistical Package (SPSS, Inc.). Student t-test analysis was used for two-group comparison whereas multigroup analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA analysis with Bonferroni’s correction. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Detailed Comparative Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis was performed using Social Sciences Statistical Package (SPSS, Inc.). Statistical analysis between two groups was performed using the unpaired Student’s t-test. Statistical analysis between more than two groups was performed using a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison post hoc test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!