The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism 8.0 software

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

Prism 8.0 is a data analysis and graphing software developed by GraphPad. It is designed to help researchers, scientists, and professionals efficiently analyze and visualize data. The software provides a wide range of tools for data management, statistical analysis, and graphical representation of results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

11 protocols using prism 8.0 software

1

Quantifying Viral Attachment to Vero Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vero cells were seeded in 24 well plate at a density of 1.1x105 cells/well. The following day, cells and viruses (ZIKV or USUV, MOI = 3) were cooled to 4°C for 10 minutes. The viruses were then allowed to attach to the cells in the presence of colostrum (ID90). After an incubation of 2 h on ice, the cells were washed with a cold medium to remove any unbound virus. The cells were then subjected to three rounds of freeze-thawing to release any bound virus, and the lysate was clarified by means of low speed centrifugation for 10 minutes. The cell-bound virus titers were determined by means of plaque assay (ZIKV) or indirect immunostaining (USUV), as outlined above. The presence of any significant differences was assessed by means of Student’s t-test, using PRISM 8.0 GraphPad Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were reported as mean values ± SEM of at least three independent experiments (n = 3) routinely performed in triplicate (three wells/condition). Results were analyzed using Prism 8.0 GraphPad Software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was determined using an ANOVA followed by a Dunnett post hoc test. Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences in multiple groups were determined by one-way ANOVA analysis. Tukey’s post hoc test was performed after a one-way ANOVA analysis. However, differences between the two groups were determined by Student’s t-tests (unpaired, two-tailed). Experimental data in this study were analysed by using Prism 8.0 GraphPad Software (USA). P < 0 .05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean with error bars showing the standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8.0 GraphPad software (GraphPad). Data were analyzed using a un/paired two‐sided Student's t‐test, One‐Way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Holm–Sidak's post‐test, Two‐Way ANOVA with Sidak's multiple comparisons test, or as indicated in figure legends. p‐values <0.05 were considered statistically significant and are reported in figures using the following notation: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001 (with * referring to the comparisons specified in each figure legend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multivariate Analysis of Surface Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The XPS measurement was performed as a series of three independent experiments. Two samples from the same batch were subjected to electrokinetic potential measurements in technical duplicate in two independent experiments. The contact angle was measured in two independent experiments in technical triplicates. The biological experiments involving oste322 inserts were measured in two independent experiments in technical triplicates. The time-lapse experiment was carried out in technical triplicates in three independent experiments. The static microfluidic oste322 system experiments were conducted as three independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using either one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's, Dunnett's, or Šídák's multiple comparisons test, employing Prism 8.0 GraphPad software (GraphPad Software, USA). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were reported as mean values ± SEM of at least three independent experiments (n=3) routinely performed in triplicate (three wells/condition). Results were analyzed using Prism 8.0 GraphPad Software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, United States). Statistical significance was determined using ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test. Differences were considered as statistically significant when p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Kinase inhibition assay for CSF1R

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assays were performed in base reaction buffer (20 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.02% Brij35, 0.02 mg/ml BSA, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 2 mM DTT, 1% DMSO). YKL-05–099 was dissolved in 100% DMSO in a 10 mM stock. Serial dilution was conducted by Integra Viaflo Assist in DMSO. Recombinant CSF1R (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used at a concentration of 2.5 nM. The substrate used was pEY (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at a concentration of 0.2 mg/ml. Kinase assays were supplemented with 2 mM Mn2+, and 1 µM ATP was added. Assays were performed for 20 min at room temperature, after which time 33P-ATP (10 µCi/µl) was added followed by incubation for another 120 min at room temperature. Thereafter, radioactivity incorporated into the pEY peptide substrate was detected by filter-binding method. Kinase activity data were expressed as the percent remaining kinase activity in test samples compared to DMSO reactions. IC50 values and curve fits were obtained using Prism 8.0 GraphPad Software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed with Prism8.0 GraphPad software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent measurements. The significance of differences was determined using a two-tailed Student t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Values of p <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real-time semi-quantitative PCR (qPCR) values are presented as arbitrary units, mean ± SEM, normalized to housekeeping genes and expressed as 2−ΔΔCT in arbitrary units. GraphPad 8.0 Prism software, all data are presented as mean ± SEM. Analysis of the groups were determined using an unpaired or paired t-test as appropriate; where data were not normally distributed, a non-parametric Mann–Whitney or Wilcoxon matched-pairs test was completed. Significance was accepted when p ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analysis was carried out using the GraphPad 8.0 Prism Software, where the data were examined by pairwise testing by Mann–Whitney U test or by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Outcome of the statistical test is represented in the figures by way of p values as indicated in figure legends. Each plot shows the individual data point with the average representing median value, unless noted otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!