The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

137 protocols using multimode 8 afm

1

AFM Analysis of E. coli Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM was performed to observe the morphological changes of E. coli O157:H7 after different treatments. Bacterial suspensions of the HHP and PCA + HHP groups were prepared as described in Section 2.4 and then fixed with glutaraldehyde fixative overnight. Each mixture was washed three times and resuspended in sterilized water. Each sample was placed onto a mica sheet and naturally dried before observing using a Bruker multimode 8 AFM (Bruker Corporation, Germany) in auto scan mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

AFM Analysis of E. coli Morphological Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was performed to observe the morphological changes of E. coli O157:H7 after various treatments. Bacterial suspensions of the untreated (UT), HHP, and repair groups (repaired for 4 and 8 h) were prepared, as described in Section 2.2 and Section 2.3, and fixed with glutaraldehyde (BioDee Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) overnight at 4 °C. Each mixture was washed three times with sterilized water and re-suspended in sterilized water. Each sample was dropped onto the mica sheet and naturally dried before observing using a Bruker Multimode 8 AFM (Bruker Corporation, Karlsruhe, Germany) in auto scan mode. Then, 20 areas of 509.6 × 509.6 nm2 were randomly selected in each treatment to count the root mean square roughness using NanoScope Analysis (version 1.40, Bruker Corporation, Karlsruhe, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tapping Mode AFM Imaging of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM images were taken in tapping mode in liquid at room temperature with a MultiMode VIII AFM equipped with a Nanoscope 8.0 controller (Bruker Nano Surfaces Division) using SNL cantilevers (k = 0.12 N/m, f0 = 23 kHz, Bruker). Protein samples in different imaging buffers (300 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, varying pH) were allowed to adsorbe onto freshly cleaved mica or HOPG surfaces as substrates, respectively. Prior to incubation the chosen substrate was glued onto a round metal disk which was magnetically fixed onto the AFM scanner (PicoForce scanner, Bruker). Before the MultiMode measuring head equipped with a liquid cell (Bruker) and the cantilever was put onto the stage, additional imaging buffer was applied to the liquid cell between cantilever and glass body to prevent formation of gas bubbles close to the cantilever. Afterwards, the whole systems was allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (30 mins.) before taking images. Image processing was performed with NanoScope Analysis V1.90R1 software package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

AFM Analysis of A. fumigatus Conidia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Conidial surfaces were analyzed by AFM, using a Multimode VIII AFM (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA). A. fumigatus conidia were immobilized by mechanically trapping them into porous polycarbonate membranes with a pore size similar to the conidium diameter (it4ip SA, Belgium). After filtering a concentrated suspension of conidia, the filter was rinsed with deionized water, carefully cut and attached to a metallic puck using double-sided sticky tape. The mounted sample was then transferred to the AFM liquid cell. Images were performed in contact mode under minimal applied force, using oxide-sharpened microfabricated Si3N4 tips (MSCT, Bruker) with a nominal spring constant of 0.01 N/m. The surface coverage of the amorphous layer and the rodlets were determined visually using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Streptavidin Characterization via AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A droplet (~2 μl) was deposited on a freshly cleaved mica surface and left to absorb for 3 min. After that, 40 μl of 1× TAE buffer with 12.5 mM Mg2+ was added to the liquid cell, and a ScanAsyst Fluid tip (Bruker) was used to scan the sample in a PeakForce-tapping mode on a Multimode VIII AFM (Bruker). A minimum force was maintained in imaging to reduce the effect of scratching of streptavidin by the AFM tip that could lead to false-negative results. For statistical analysis of the streptavidin marker in the DOF cavity, three repeated measurements were taken with ~1.5 nM sample in a view of ~2 μm by 2 μm or 3 μm by 3 μm. When excess free tiles absorbed on the mica compromised the imaging quality, 1× TAE buffer containing 12.5 mM Mg2+ and 100 mM Na+ was prepared as the imaging buffer and used to rinse the mica gently before AFM imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanomechanical Mapping of PCL Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nanomechanical mapping of non-porous and porous PCL scaffolds was performed in PeakForce QNM (PF-QNM) mode50 ,51 (link) on a Bruker MultiMode VIII AFM with controller Nanoscope V at ambient conditions in tapping mode. The samples were investigated using a rectangular silicon cantilever with nominal spring constant of 3 N/m. The cantilever was calibrated on the calibration samples (Bruker, USA) - typically low-density polyethylene and polystyrene with Young’s moduli ranging from 100 MPa to 2 GPa (polyethylene) and from 1 to 20 GPa (polystyrene). The spring constant was measured by a thermal tuning method. The oscillation frequency of the Z-piezo was 1 kHz. The tip radius was obtained by tapping mode imaging of a Bruker reference tip-check sample and then analysed by commercial Nanoscope software. The Young’s modulus, E, is obtained by fitting the unloading curve using the Derjaguin, Muller, Toropov (DMT) model52 (link), which takes into account the adhesive force between the tip and the surface. The analysis of the Derjaguin-Mueller-Toporov (DMT) modulus was performed by the software Nanoscope Analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Atomic Force Microscopy of Xoo

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell morphology of Xoo was observed using atomic force microscopy with a previously described method with some modification (Tang et al., 2020 (link)). Cell preparations with 1 × 109 CFU/mL were obtained as described in the method of TEM observation. After treated with 54 μg/mL TKA at 28°C for 24 h, 2.5 μL cell preparation was deposited onto freshly cleaved mica and was dried in a chamber at room temperature. Atomic force microscopy was performed using a Multimode VIII AFM with Nanoscope V controller (Bruker AXS, Germany), and images were pictured in the scanasyst mode under air condition. Methanol (0.3%, v/v) treatment was used as the negative control. At least 50 Xoo cells were detected in each treatment. Three replicates were performed in each treatment, and the experiment was repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Atomic Force Microscopy of Sacculi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A drop (1.5 μl) of sacculi suspension was spread onto freshly cleaved mica and air-dried. AFM imaging was carried out using a Multimode VIII AFM with a Nanoscope V controller (Bruker, USA). Silicon cantilevers (XSC11/AI BS, MikroMasch) were used for imaging under ambient conditions. AFM imaging was carried out in ScanAsyst mode in air condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging of Mica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For AFM imaging, 30 µL NiCl2 (10 mm) was deposited on freshly cleaved mica and left to adsorb for 10 min. The mica surface was washed with water and dried with nitrogen. Next, 3 µL of sample solution was deposited onto the mica and left for 3 min. Excess salt was removed using a drop of doubly distilled H2O, and the sample was dried with nitrogen. AFM imaging was performed under air tapping mode using a Multimode VIII AFM (Bruker, Inc.). A “SCANASYST‐AIR” model cantilever (Bruker) with a spring constant of 0.4 N m−1 and a tip radius of 2 nm was chosen for the measurements. The AFM images were analyzed using NanoScope analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microscopic Analysis of Plant Root Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning Electron Microscopy. SEM images were collected on uncoated samples using a Phenom G2 and a Zeiss (LEO) 1530VP. The roots were fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% in PBS and then air dried. To obtain sections, roots were embedded into polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and cut. The root was sliced at the level of the mid-elongation zone, in between the apex and the stem.
Atomic Force Microscopy. Substrate surfaces used for AFM imaging were native Silicon Oxide (SiOx) functionalized with 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES). Briefly, the SiOx pieces were first cleaned by the sequential sonication in Acetone, Isopropyl alcohol, and milliQ water; then they were exposed to an oxygen plasma for 5 min. The fragments were then closed in a desiccator containing 10 ul APTES and 10 ul triethanolamine under a mild vacuum for 30 min; 5 ul of CNT solution was spotted onto the APTES-SiOx and dried. Images were performed using a Multimode VIII AFM (Bruker) equipped with a Nanoscope V controller and operated in Peakforce tapping mode; NSG01 probes (NT-MDT) were used. Images were processed by Gwyddion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!