The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rnase free dnase

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Canada, Germany, China, Lithuania, United Kingdom, Switzerland

RNase-free DNase is a laboratory reagent used to remove DNA from RNA samples. It is designed to effectively degrade DNA without affecting the integrity of RNA.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

295 protocols using rnase free dnase

1

Quantifying tra gene expression in AIEC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To track the expression of tra genes in the adherent AIEC population, wild-type AIEC was grown in LB at 37 °C overnight. The next day, bacteria were used to either infect Caco-2 cells at an MOI 1000:1 or cell-free DMEM media for 4 h. Importantly, non-adherent bacteria were washed out with sterile PBS. At the end of the infection, bacterial pellets were harvested from both conditions and nucleic acid was extracted using the Trizol-based method. Upon treatment with RNase-free DNase (Thermo Fisher), cDNA was obtained using either qScript cDNA Supermix (Quantabio) or protoscript (NEB). qPCR was performed with SYBR green SuperMix (Quanta Biosciences) on the LightCycler 480 (Roche) or Bio-Rad CFX96 real-time PCR detection systems. Primers used are listed in Supplementary Data 2. Data analysis was performed using the LightCycler software (version 1.5). Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene, gyrB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcript Profiling of runx1 Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from lymphocytes of adult runx1+/+ and runx1W84X/W84X mutants were extracted by TRIzol Reagent (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) following the manufacturer's instructions and converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Madison, USA) with oligo18-dT (deoxy-thymine) primers. RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) before the reverse transcription reaction. Q-RT-PCR reactions were performed using LightCycler Nano System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (ROX) (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with 10 pmol of each primer and each sample was tested in triplicate. The housekeeping gene, elongation factor 1-α (ef-1α), served as an internal control to normalize the relative fold changes using the ΔΔCt threshold method. The primers used in Q-RT-PCR are listed in table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Gene Expression via RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from frozen material using TRIzol reagent and then treated with RNase-free DNase to eliminate genomic DNA (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed, using the Superscript II RT kit (Invitrogen), and the cDNA was then used as template for real-time PCR. The reactions were performed as described [7 (link)] using a MiniOpticon Real-Time PCR System with SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (BioRad) and primer pairs specific for ACT8 (5′TCCAGGCATTGTCCACAGAA3’/5′ACCTGCTCCTCCTTAGACAT3′), GIR1 (5′GACGAGCCATCTGTGAGATA3’/5′TTTGTGGCGTTTTCATGGAG3′), or GIR2 (5′TTCTCAAGCCAGCCAGATGA 3’/5′GTCTGGTATTGGCAGCGGTA 3′). Tested gene expression values were standardized to the expression levels of the constitutive housekeeping ACT8 gene. For each sample, at least three replications were performed in one experiment. The relative expression level of each gene was calculated using the cycle threshold (CT) 2−ΔΔCT method [8 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis of Plant Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen plant material from second internodes or the stem base (including 5 mm above) of 15–20 cm tall plants (three biological replicates (three plants each) per genotype/treatment) were pulverized with pestle and mortar and RNA was isolated by phenol/chloroform extraction. RNA elution in RNase-free water was followed by treatment with RNase-free DNase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and reverse transcription (RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNA was diluted 1:25 prior to amplification. qRT-PCR was performed using SensiMix™ SYBR® Green (Bioline Reagents Ltd) mastermix and gene-specific primers (listed in Supplementary Table 1) in a Roche Lightcycler480 following the manufacturer’s instructions. Experiments were performed in triplicates with plant material of three plants being pooled for each replicate. Two reference genes (ACT2 and EIF4a) were used to normalize our signal. Error bars: ±standard deviation. Raw amplification data were exported and further analysis and statistical tests were done using Microsoft Excel 2010.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Avocado Root RNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Roots from 9 avocado plants from control, mild-WS and severe-WS were harvested at t1 and t2 in plants others than those used in the pathogenicity test. Three biological replicates were used for RNA extraction. Each replicate consisted in a bulk sample from three plants. RNA from ground root tissue was extracted using the CTAB extraction method [113 (link)], a simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees with slight modification. The chloroform:isoamyl alcohol step was repeated 3–5 times, depending on the stability of the interphase and colour of the sample. RNA quantity and quality were determined based on A260/280 and A260/230 wavelength ratios using a NanoDrop® ND-1000 (Nanodrop Technologies, Inc., Montchanin, USA) spectrophotometer. RNA integrity was confirmed by the appearance of ribosomal RNA bands and lack of degradation products after separation on a 2% agarose gel and Red Safe staining. DNase treatment of RNA was performed by the addition of 1 U RNase-free DNase (Thermo Scientific, Life Technologies Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA), 1 μL 10x reaction buffer with MgCl2, 1 μg RNA, 0.5 μL of RiboLock RNase Inhibitor (Thermo Scientific Inc., California, USA) and diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water to a final volume of 10 μL. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 45 min followed by the addition 1 μL of 50 mM EDTA and incubation at 65 °C for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of VZV Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from the adrenal glands was extracted using the TriPure isolation agent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and the Direct-zol RNA mini prep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). Before cDNA synthesis, the RNA was treated with RNAse-free DNAse (Thermo Fischer Scientific) to eliminate any residual genomic DNA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNAwas synthesized from the RNA by reverse transcription using the Transcriptor First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and analyzed by qPCR for the presence of VZV immediate-early, early, and late genes (ORF 63, 29, and 68, respectively) using TaqMan primers as described (Gilden et al. 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR for tst Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNX-Plus reagent (SinaClon, Iran) was used to isolate total RNA, according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. RNA was quantified, and the concentration and purity were
measured based on absorption rate of 260/280 nm using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer
(Nanodrop 2000, Thermo Scientific, USA). Total RNA samples were treated with RNase-free
DNase (Thermo Scientific, USA) before quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain
reaction (qRT-PCR). A RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, USA)
was used to synthesize complementary DNA (cDNA) from total RNA. A PCR test was applied
using tst specific primers on cDNA to confirm tst gene
expression after lipofection. Primer sequences were as follows:
tst-
Sense: 5´-GCACAAACGACAACATTAAGGACC-3ˊ
Antisense: 5´-TTGTCCGCTTTGTGTTGAGGTC-3ˊ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Avocado Root Transcriptome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Avocado roots from control, mild-WS, and severe-WS plants were harvested at t1 and t2. Three biological replicates per timepoint, in which each biological replicate consisted of three plants (n = 9), were used for RNA extraction in each experimental group. RNA from ground root tissue was extracted using the CTAB extraction method [161 (link)] with modification described by Zumaquero et al. [21 (link)]. RNA parameters and integrity were checked using a NanoDrop® ND-1000 (Nanodrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) spectrophotometer based on the A260/280 and A260/230 wavelength ratios and running samples on a 2% agarose gel. RNA samples were treated with a DNase treatment with 1 U of RNase-free DNase (Thermo Scientific, Life Technologies Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1 μL of 10× reaction buffer with MgCl2, 1 μg of RNA, 0.5 μL of RiboLock RNase Inhibitor (Thermo Scientific Inc., CA, USA), and diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water to a final volume of 10 μL in all RNA samples. The mixture was incubated according to the manufacturer’s instructions at 37 °C for 45 min followed by the addition of 1 μL of 50 mM EDTA and incubation at 65 °C for 10 min according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring hnRNP A2B1-bound AR pre-RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CWR22Rv1 cells were infected with AdTR3 or AdCtrl, maintained for 24 h, and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 10 min. The fixed cells were then subjected to cross-linked RNA-immunoprecipitation (CLIP) analysis as previously described [17 (link)] with minor modifications. The protein-bound primary RNA fragments were enriched through immunoprecipitation with anti-hnRNP A2B1 antibodies (Table S2). DNA contaminants were removed by treating with RNase-free DNase (ThermoFisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) at 37 °C for 30 min, following which, RNA fragments were obtained using chloroform extraction, and cDNA was synthesized using random hexamers (Enzynomics) and M-MLV Reverse transcriptase kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Enrichment of AR pre-RNA fragments was analyzed via RT-PCR using the CLIP primers listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Oxidative Stress Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of NOX1, p47phox and HIF-1α messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in 22Rv1 cells was performed using gene-specific primers. Total RNA was extracted from DMSO or GPE-treated 22Rv1 cells with Tri reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) and the integrity of RNA was determined by running on agarose gel prior to further downstream application. The RT-PCR was carried out using one-step RT-PCR kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and total RNA (200 ng) was taken as template for each reaction. β-actin gene was taken as endogenous internal standard. NOX1 oligonucleotide sequences for PCR primers were 5′-GGTTGTTTGGTTAGGGCTGA-3′ and 5′-CTGGAGAGAATGGAGGCAAG-3′. p47phox oligonucleotide sequences for PCR primers were 5′-CCCGATACCCAGTTTCAGTG-3′ and 5′-GGAAGGTCTCCTTGAGGGTC-3′. HIF-1α oligonucleotide sequences for PCR primers were 5′-CAGAGCAGGAAAAGGAGTCA-3′ and 5′-AGTAGCTGCATGATCGTCTG-3′. β-actin oligonucleotide sequences for PCR primers were 5′-TCCTTAATGTCACGCACGATTT-3′ and 5′-GAGCGCGGCTACAGCTT-3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!