The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using thermo scientific k alpha

1

Morphological and Elemental Analysis of Ni, TiO2/Ni, and Ag/TiO2/Ni

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology characterization and elemental analysis of Ni, TiO2/Ni and Ag/TiO2/Ni were performed on Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM, Nova NanoSEM 450 (FEI Company, Hillsboro, America)). The UV-vis absorption of the samples was measured on UV-vis spectrophotometry (UV-vis, UV-3600 (Shimadzu company, Kyoto, Japan)) in the wavenumber range of 200–800 nm. XPS studies were performed on X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific K-Alpha (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, America))to analyze the elemental composition and chemical states of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Characterization of BCN Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were carried out on a Bruker D8 powder X-ray Cu Kα radiation diffractometer at 60 kV and 60 mA (Bruker, Germany). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was conducted using a Tecnai G2 F20 S-TWIN TMP (FEI Inc., U.S.). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha+ (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., U.S.). The surface functionality of BCN was studied using a Nicolet IS 10 FTIR spectrometer in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., U.S.). The specific surface area of the samples was determined using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation (JW-BK200C, Beijing JWGB Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the precursor was conducted using a Shimadzu TGA 50 (Shimadzu, Inc., Japan) at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 from 30 °C to 1000 °C under nitrogen. The adsorption capacity of the nanofibers was determined using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (760CRT, INEAA, CN) at a wavelength of 620 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural and Electrochemical Analysis of Spinel LiMn2O4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The structure and morphology information of materials was obtained with a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, MIRA3 LMH, TESCAN, Brno-Kohoutovice, Czech) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, TTR-3, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), and the masses of the XRD samples of spinel LMO before and after desalination were controlled to be equal. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were operated on an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Thermo Scientific K-alpha, Thermofisher, Waltham, USA) with Mono AlKα as the X-ray source to get the valence information of the spinel LiMn2O4. The tap densities of the materials were tested by a tap density tester (BT-302, Bettersize, Dandong, China). The surface area and pore size analyzer (KUBOX1000, Bjbuilder, Beijing, China) was employed to measure the specific surface area (SSA) and pore size distribution (PSD) with the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The PSD information was further analyzed with a Barret–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Gadolinium Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and morphology of Gd2O3:Eu NPs were tested by Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM, JEOL Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). The diameters of the NPs were measured with Image J according to the TEM images (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA). Fluorescent properties including emission and excitation spectra were measured using EnSpire Multimode Plate Readers (PerkinElmer, Inc., Massachusetts, USA). The crystal characteristics of the nanoparticles were tested with an Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out with Thermo Scientific K-Alpha + (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Material Surface Characterization Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of materials was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (FEI-NOVANANOSEM 450, FEI Company, Hillsboro, WA, USA). The specific surface area and pore diameter distribution of the materials were measured by an automatic specific surface area tester (Mike ASAP 2460, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) by using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (IRPrestige-21, Shimadzu Company, Tokyo, Japan) was used to investigate the element composites and functional groups of materials. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Scientific K-Alpha, Thermo Scientific company, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure the element and chemical composition of the materials’ surfaces.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Advanced Materials Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of the samples were imaged using a JSM 6490LV from JEOL (BEIJING) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China scanning electron microscope (SEM). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were collected on a Technai G2 20. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using an X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS, Thermo Scientific K-Alpha+) from ThermoFisher Technology (China) Co., Ltd., shanghai, China. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted with a X’ Pert PRO diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Novel Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X-ray diffraction (XRD, SmartLab, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) was conducted using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). Raman scattering was recorded using a LabRAM HR Evolution Raman spectrometer with a 532 nm laser (Horiba Jobin-Yvon, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) was performed using a Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (Shimadzu IRAffinity-1S, Kyoto, Japan). The morphology was observed via field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi S4800, Kyoto, Japan) and field-emission transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai TF20, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The elemental energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis was conducted using an Oxford EDS detector. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed using a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source with photon energy of 1486.6 eV (Thermo Scientific K-Alpha, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed on a CHI760E electrochemical workstation (Chenhua, China) with a Pt wire counter electrode and an Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl) reference electrode. An electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometer (EPR, JEOL JES FA200, Tokyo, Japan) was used to identify the radical species with DMPO and TEMP spin-trapping agents.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is carried out using TESCAN MIRA LMS (TESCAN, Brno, The Czech Republic) to characterize the morphologies of samples. X-ray diffraction (XRD) is carried out using Ultima-IV (Origin Systems, Austin, TX, USA) to identify the phase structure of samples. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra are obtained on a Niolet iN10 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra data are obtained on Thermo Scientific K-Alpha+ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). Thermogravimetric analysis testing (TGA) is measured using Discovery TGA 550 (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) from room temperature to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere. The uniaxial tensile tests are conducted on Inspekt Table Blue 5KN testing machine (Hegewald & Peschke, Nossen, Germany). Samples are cut into the size of 150 mm × 15 mm × 1.25 mm and tested with a crosshead speed of 30 mm min−1. The lithium metal electrodes used for SEM and XPS characterization are cleaned with DME several times and dried in an Ar-filled glove box.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal phases were investigated via an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, XRD-6100, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). The morphologies and lattice properties were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Sigma, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM2100, JEOL, Kyoto, Japan). The specific surface areas were determined by the physical adsorption of N2 on a Micromeritics (ASAP 2020, Micromeritics, Atlanta, GA, USA) using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation. The chemical state was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific K-Alpha, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The light absorption as well as charge separation and transfer efficiency were studied by ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflection spectroscopy (UV–vis DRS, Lambda 750, PerkinElmer, Waltham, USA), photoluminescence spectroscopy (PL, ZolixLSP-X500A, Zolix, Beijing, China), fluorescence lifetime spectrophotometer (C11367, Quantaurus-Tau, Hamamatsu, Japan), and three-electrode photoelectrochemical cell system (CHI660E, Chenghua, Shanghai, China). The water contact angles were measured by a contact angle meter (HARKE-SPCA, HARKE, Beijing, China). TOC analyzer (TOC-2000, Metash, Shanghai, China) was utilized to investigate the total organic carbon (TOC) of the residual solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy of Apo-Hemoglobin Au Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of apo-R168H/L169C-rHLFr Au composites acquired on a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha (Thermo Scientific, USA) using an Al Ka X-ray source (6 mA, 15 kV). The freshly prepared apo-R168H/L169C-rHLFr Au composites were concentrated to about 30 μM and dropped on clean Si plates to dry, then used for XPS analysis. The binding energy was corrected using C1s spectra (284.8 eV) as a standard before further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!