The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Evos fl inverted microscope

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The EVOS FL inverted microscope is a versatile imaging system designed for live cell and fluorescence applications. It features a compact and ergonomic design, a high-resolution camera, and a range of objective lenses to accommodate various sample types. The EVOS FL inverted microscope allows users to observe and capture images of cells and other biological specimens under controlled environmental conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using evos fl inverted microscope

1

Transcriptomic Analysis of Lung Fibroblast Response to CpG and Nu7441

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung fibroblasts were cultured in complete medium at 37 °C and 10% CO2. Medium was changed twice a week and cells were passaged when 70–90% confluency was reached. For transcriptomic experiments, 2.5 × 105 lung fibroblasts per well were plated in complete medium into a 6-well plate overnight at 37 °C and 10% CO2. Cells were then stimulated with 10 μM CpG (Hycult Biotech) and/or treated with 500 nM Nu7441 (Selleckchem.com) for 24 h (acute) or once every 3 days for a total of 25 days. After treatment, images of the cultured cells were acquired using an EVOS FL inverted microscope at 20x magnification (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were then trypsinized for Flow Cytometry or lysed by Trizol™ (Thermo-Fisher Scientific) for qPCR analysis as described. For studies assessing Collagen 1, IL-8, IL-1ß and αSMA protein expression, cells were then stimulated with 10 μM CpG (Hycult Biotech), 20 ng/ml recombinant TGFß1 (R&D systems) and/or treated with 500 nM of Nu7441 (Selleckchem.com) for 24 or 72 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Labeling of Organoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ALI-COs were visualised on an EVOS FL inverted microscope (ThermoFisher) and using a microinjection capillary <0.2 μl of 1 mg/ml AlexaFluor 647-conjugate CTB (ThermoFisher, C34778) or 1-4 DiI crystals (ThermoFisher, D3911) were applied to the target region. DiI tracing was performed multiple times but due to difficulty with dye uptake and low signal-to-noise ratio only in one experiment was tracing of sufficient quality for analyis. Similarly, to achieve sparse neuronal labeling, ALI-COs were injected with <0.2 μl of CytoTune emGFP Sendai fluorescence reporter (ThermoFisher, A16519). Four days after CTB and DiI labeling and 5 days after viral emGFP labelling the samples were fixed for histological analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Vaginal Cytology for Estrous Staging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Estrous cycle stage was determined daily from 9–10 am, prior to lights off, by obtaining vaginal smears as previously described (Satta et al., 2018 (link)). Vaginal smears were analyzed immediately by bright field microscopy using an EVOS® FL inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ROS Visualization in Animal Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To visualize ROS levels in the brains of study animals, 10 μm unfixed, frozen sections (midsagittal cut/plane) were processed through DHE staining using 150 μl of 10 μM DHE, slides were then cover-slipped and incubated at 37 °C for 45 min, as previously described by our laboratory (Lund et al., 2009 (link), 2011 (link); Oppenheim et al., 2013 (link)). Ethidium staining was visualized by fluorescent microscopy at 40 × on an EVOS FL-inverted microscope (ThermoFisher, Scientific, Richardson, TX, USA), digitally recorded, and analyzed by image densitometry (color images converted to white/black) using Image J software, from minimum of three slides, two sections each, three regions from each section (n = 3–4 per group). A subset of slides (two sections per slide, n = 3 per treatment/exposure group) were pretreated with flavoenzyme inhibitor, diphenyleneiodonium (DPI, 0.1 mM, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) in dark, moist chamber at 37 °C for 30 min prior to DHE staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Vaginal Smear Analysis for Estrous Cycle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Estrous cycle stage was determined daily from 9 to 10 am, prior to lights off, by obtaining vaginal smears as previously described (Satta et al., 2018 (link)). Vaginal smears were analyzed immediately by bright field microscopy using an EVOS® FL inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Vaginal Cytology for Estrous Staging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vaginal cytology was performed for at least two weeks in freely cycling females prior to performing experiments. A cotton swab was moistened with sterile water and gently inserted less than 1 mm into the vaginal opening and rotated. Immediately after removal from the vaginal opening, the swab was wiped on a microscope slide and the smear analyzed by bright field microscopy using an EVOS® FL inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Estrous phase was determined based on vaginal cellular composition. For freely cycling mice, estrus vaginal composition was identified by an abundance of cornified epithelial cells, while diestrus II (herein referred to diestrus) was identified by the predominance of leukocytes in the smears [51 (link)](Fig 1). These two phases show large differences in circulating estrogen levels in mice, and are of substantially longer duration than either proestrus or metestrus/diestrus I [52 (link)]. For electrophysiology, the final smears were obtained 1–2 hours prior to euthanasia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CRISPR-Induced Zebrafish Embryo Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were initially monitored twice daily following CRISPR injections. Embryos displaying divergent morphology were separated as “phenotypic” and surviving phenotypic embryos at 3 dpf were counted (Table 1). Subsequently, injected embryos were scored into three phenotypic classes under a dissecting microscope (Leica Zoom 2000) 24 hpf. Those with no apparent differences from wild-type embryos were scored into classification 1 (none). Those with abnormally small (or absent) heads and/or abnormally shaped eyes were scored into classification 2 (intermediate). Those with morphological abnormalities that prevented head and tail from being clearly distinguished were scored into classification 3 (severe). Representative embryos from each class are displayed in Figure S2.
For phenotypic characterization, live embryos were mounted 24 hpf in E3 medium (0.17 mM KCl, 0.33 mM CaCl2, 0.33 mM Mg SO4, 5% Methylene Blue) on a glass slide (Corning) with no coverslip and photographed under transmitted light on an EVOS FL inverted microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Representative embryos were selected for imaging from total injected embryos (Table 2; N) Images were taken both in and out of the chorion. Knockout embryos were always imaged in conjunction with wild-type embryos from the same clutch.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Labeling of Organoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ALI-COs were visualised on an EVOS FL inverted microscope (ThermoFisher) and using a microinjection capillary <0.2 μl of 1 mg/ml AlexaFluor 647-conjugate CTB (ThermoFisher, C34778) or 1-4 DiI crystals (ThermoFisher, D3911) were applied to the target region. DiI tracing was performed multiple times but due to difficulty with dye uptake and low signal-to-noise ratio only in one experiment was tracing of sufficient quality for analyis. Similarly, to achieve sparse neuronal labeling, ALI-COs were injected with <0.2 μl of CytoTune emGFP Sendai fluorescence reporter (ThermoFisher, A16519). Four days after CTB and DiI labeling and 5 days after viral emGFP labelling the samples were fixed for histological analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fluorescent Visualization of Actin Cytoskeleton

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells (4 × 104) were plated on 12-mm coverslips in duplicates in 24-well dishes and serum starved for 3 h before adding warm 10% FBS in DMEM for 20 min. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at RT, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min at RT, and washed with PBS. The cells were blocked with 0.5 mL antibody (Ab) dilution buffer (PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, 3% BSA, 5% glycine) with 10% nonimmune horse serum at room temperature for 1hr. Next, 100 µL of diluted Alexa fluor 594 phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) in Ab dilution buffer with no horse serum (1:200) was added and incubated overnight. Cells were washed with PBS and stained with 150 nM DAPI for 5 min at RT. Coverslips were mounted with Permount-G (SouthernBotech). Random fields per coverslip were imaged at 20× and 40× on an EVOS FL Inverted Microscope (Thermofisher) using DAPI and Texas Red filters. The images were loaded onto ImageJ software and 100 cells per condition were used to measure parameters that included surface areas, elongation ratios, number of projections and length of projections.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Wound Healing Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded into duplicate wells of a 48 well plate at a density of 2x10 5 cells per well for HEK293T or 4x10 5 (link) for Hct116 and SW480. Cells recovered overnight, and were scratched using a p20 pipette tip the following day. Compounds were added at the concentrations indicated. Images were obtained immediately after the scratch and after a 24 hour incubation with the drug on an Evos FL inverted microscope (ThermoFisher). The area within the scratch was calculated using ImageJ. The area migrated was measured as the difference in wound area at 0h and 24h, and percent migration represents area migrated in the drug treated cells divided by the area migrated in vehicle control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!