The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using rotor gene rg 6000

1

Quantitative RT-PCR for Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The same RNA used in the microarray analysis was reverse transcribed to cDNA (QuantiTect kit) using 500 ng template RNA per reaction, for confirmatory PCR. RT-PCR reactions were performed using 5 μl IQ PCR mix (BioRad, Australia) with 1μl of total template cDNA from each sample, 1μl of each primer diluted to a 5 μM working solution (Table 1) and 1μl sterile water to a final volume of 10μl. qPCRs were performed with a RotorGene RG 6000 (Qiagen, USA). Three reference or ‘housekeeper’ genes were tested; PPIA, HPRT1, TBP, and were selected for all analyses after confirmation. For each gene tested, all experimental and control retina were assessed in the same experiment, n = 3 were used and data pooled from two experimental runs. The data were normalized to the geometric mean of the three housekeeper genes and expressed as arbitrary units of expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PCR of Microbial 16S rRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
qPCR was performed using the Qiagen Rotor-Gene RG-6000 (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The total qPCR reaction volume of 20 μL consisted of 10 μL SYBR® premix ExTaq™ (Takara, Japan), 0.4 μL each of forward and reverse primers, 7.2 μL sterile Milli-Q water, and 2 μL of the extracted DNA sample from each treatment. Species-specific PCR primers used to amplify the 16S rRNA were chosen from the literature (Table-1) [12 (link)–14 (link)]. Amplification was performed with the following cycling parameters: 95°C for 10 s, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 30 s [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Gene Expression Levels by RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specific gene expression levels were measured by quantitative PCR after reverse transcription (RT-qPCR), as previously described [37 (link)]. RNA was reverse transcribed with ImProm-II reverse transcriptase as specified by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Amounts of specific cDNA were quantified on a Rotor Gene RG6000 instrument (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) by using the QuantiFast SYBR green PCR Kit (Qiagen), and primers annealing to the target genes (Table S3). For each strain, mRNA levels of target genes were normalized to that of housekeeping gene rpsL and were expressed as a ratio to the transcript levels of strain PA14. Mean gene expression values were calculated from two independent bacterial cultures, each assayed in duplicate. As shown previously, transcript levels of mexB > 2-fold, mexY ≥ 5-fold, mexC and mexE ≥ 20-fold those of PA14, were considered as significantly increased because associated with a ≥two-fold higher resistance to respective pump substrates [37 (link),38 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Differential Gene Expression Using RT-qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specific gene expression levels were measured by quantitative PCR after reverse transcription (RT-qPCR), as previously described (Richardot et al., 2016 (link)). RNA was reverse transcribed with ImProm-II reverse transcriptase, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Promega, Madison, WI, United States). Amounts of specific cDNA were assessed on a Rotor Gene RG6000 instrument (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) by using the QuantiFast SYBR green PCR Kit (Qiagen) and primers annealing to target gene sequences (Supplementary Table 1). For each strain, target gene mRNA levels were normalized to that of housekeeping gene rpsL, and were expressed as a ratio to the transcript levels of strain PA14. Mean gene expression values were calculated from two independent bacterial cultures, each assayed in duplicate. As shown previously, transcript levels of mexB ≥ 3-fold, mexY ≥ 5-fold, mexC, and mexE ≥ 20-fold those of PA14, were considered as significantly increased because associated with a ≥ 2-fold higher resistance to respective pump substrates (Llanes et al., 2013 (link); Richardot et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of ANDV RNA in Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung samples were excised and placed into a 2-ml tube containing 500 l of sterile DMEM and a stainless steel bead. Tissues were homogenized (10 min, 30 Hz) using a TissueLyser (Qiagen). Tubes were then centrifuged for 5 min at 8000g, and 140 l was used for RNA extraction using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). qRT-PCR was performed using the Rotor-Gene RG-6000 instrument (Qiagen) and QuantiFast Probe RT-PCR kit (Qiagen), as previously described (48) . Samples were compared to a standard curve using in vitro transcribed ANDV RNA fragment of known S-segment copy number. Total RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lung Gene Expression via qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from whole lungs, after micro-CT scanning. qPCR was performed using the SensiMIX™ SYBR® Hi-ROX kit (Bioline) and analysed on a Corbett Rotor Gene RG-6000 using cycling parameters: initial hold for 10 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 20 s, and acquisition on the green channel. Rotor-Gene 6000 series software version 1.7 was used to analyse the results. ΔΔCt values were calculated and normalised to the 18S rRNA reference gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Two-Step PCR for Scat/Autopsy Barcoding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A two-step PCR generated rbcL and ndhJ barcodes from scat/autopsy samples. First, the following Illumina sequences were added to the 5' end of primers:
F: TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG,
R: GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG.
Initial amplification was performed in 20μl of: 1x MyFi Buffer, 1.6U MyFi Polymerase (Bioline), 200 pM of each forward and reverse primers, and 20 ng DNA. PCR conditions for rbcL and ndhJ: 95°C (1 min) followed by 35 cycles of 95°C 15 s, 55°C 15 s, 72°C 15 s. Products were purified using the Agencourt AMPure XP PCR Purification beads at a v/v ratio of 0.6x beads/PCR product.
Second PCR was performed in 12.5 μl volumes of: 1x MyFi Buffer (Bioline,); 0.4 nM of paired Nextera 96 Indices (Illumina); 1.6U MyFi Polymerase (Bioline) and 2 μl of purified initial amplicon. Thermocycling conditions were: 95°C 1 min, then 5 cycles 95°C 5 s, 55°C 10 s, 72°C 10 s. Products were purified as above and quantified by qPCR calibrated to known PhiX standards (Illumina) using the SYBR FAST qPCR Kit (Kapa Biosystems) on a RotorGene RG-6000 (Corbett).
Indexed libraries were pooled and 16 pM aliquots were paired-end sequenced on a MiSeq sequencer using a 600-cycle Version 3 kit (Illumina). The MiSeq Bcl output files were de-multiplexed and converted to FASTQ files using MiSeq Reporter v2.6 software (Illumina).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis in Mammary Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was prepared using the RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen) from FACS-sorted luminal cells isolated from the mammary glands of FVB/N dams at 18.5 dP or 2 days of lactation, or from total mammary tissue derived from AURKA-deficient or control mice at 14 days of lactation. Reverse transcription was carried out using oligo(dT) primer and SuperscriptIII reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, MA, USA). Quantitative RT–PCR analysis was performed using a Rotorgene RG-6000 (Corbett Research, Australia) and normalized against 18S ribosomal RNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA-Seq and qPCR Analysis of Sorted Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human and mouse RNA was extracted from snap-frozen sorted cell pellets using a RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen), and DNase treatment was performed using the TURBO DNA-free Kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq at the Australian Genome Research Facility. Per human sample, 16–26 million 100 bp single-end reads were generated, and 13–17 million 100 bp single-end reads were generated per mouse sample. For human qPCR analyses, cDNA was generated using the SuperScript III system (Life Technologies) and subject to qRT-PCR using the Sensimix SYBR Hi-Rox kit (Bioline) on the Rotorgene RG-6000 (Corbett Research) under standard conditions. Three technical replicates were performed for each sample. Taqman gene expression assays were used for MUC5AC (Hs0087365_mH) and FOXJ1 (HS00230964_m1) using 18S (HS99999901_s1) or GAPDH (HS99999905_m1) as reference genes (Life Technologies). The sequence of the primers is available in S1 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Gene Expression Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using an RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, VIC, Australia). RNA concentrations and quality were determined using a NanoDrop-3000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., NC, USA). Four micrograms of total RNA was reverse-transcribed with 200 units of Superscript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies, CA, USA) and 0.5 μg of oligo (dT) 15 primers (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in a reaction volume of 20 μL. RT-PCR was performed using 3 μL of cDNA (represented 6 ng RNA), 0.5 μM of each primer (Table 1), and FastStart SYBR green PCR Master (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) in a Rotor Gene RG-6000 (Corbett Research, NSW, Australia). To quantify the gene expression profile in each sample, the efficiency of each standard curve was determined by its slope and comparative threshold. Data were presented as ratio of the amount of targeted mRNA (arbitrary units) normalised with the house-keeping gene beta 2-microglobulin (β2M)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!