The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using nanolc ultra 2d system

1

Nano-RPLC Mass Spectrometry Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Online Nano-RPLC was used on an Eksigent nanoLC-Ultra™ 2D System (AB SCIEX). The samples were re-suspended with Nano-RPLC buffer A (0.1% formic acid, 2% acetonitrile), loaded on a C18 nanoLC trap column (100 μm × 3 cm, C18, 3-μm particle size, 150 Å), and washed with Nano-RPLC buffer A at a flow rate of 2 μl/min for 10 min. A linear LC gradient profile was used to elute peptides from the analytical ChromXP C18 column (75 μm × 15 cm, C18, 3-μm particle size, 120 Å, Eksigent). The gradient began with 5% Nano-RPLC buffer B (0.1% formic acid, 98% acetonitrile) and rose to 35% within 70 min. Data acquisition was performed with a Triple TOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, USA) fitted with a Nanospray III source (AB SCIEX, USA) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, USA). Data were acquired using an ion spray voltage of 2.5 kV, curtain gas of 30 PSI, nebulizer gas of 5 PSI, and an interface heater temperature of 150°C. For information dependent acquisition, survey scans were acquired in 250 ms, and as many as 35 product ion scans were collected if they exceeded a threshold of 150 counts per second (counts/s) with a 2+ to 5+ charge-state. The total cycle time was fixed to 2.5 s. A rolling collision energy setting was applied to all precursor ions for collision-induced dissociation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoprecipitation and Mass Spectrometry of PIG-B

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S2 cells expressing PIG-B-Flag were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and suspended in 1% formaldehyde for crosslinking. After 10 min, cells were washed three times with PBS containing 1.25 M glycine, sonicated in RIPA buffer and centrifuged. Supernatants were incubated with anti-DYKDDDDK tag antibody-conjugated magnetic beads (Wako Junyaku). After three washes with RIPA buffer, bound proteins were eluted with 0.1 M triethylamine (pH 11.5). The solutions were dried, resolved using 1% sodium deoxycholate (SDC), 2 M urea and 50 mM NH4HCO3, and incubated with trypsin at 37°C overnight. The solutions containing digested peptides were processed using phase-transfer methods to remove SDC. The obtained peptides were resolved with 0.1% formic acid and desalted using an Empore C18 disk (GL Science). The peptides were separated on a C18 reversed-phase column (75 µm×150 mm; ChromXP C18-CL 3 µm 120A; Eksigent) equipped with a nanoLC-Ultra 2D system (AB SCIEX). The masses of the eluted peptides were determined using a TripleTOF® 5600 (AB SCIEX) mass spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteome Profiling by Nanoflow LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction and digestion were performed according to the methods described before41 (link). The protein digests were separated using a 10 min elution gradient at a flow rate of 2 µL per min in an Eksigent nanoLC-Ultra 2D system (AB SCIEX). A C18 reversed phase chromatographic column (75 μm × 15 cm, 3 μm, 120 Å, ChromXP Eksigent) was used as the analytical column. MS/MS scan was performed by tripleTOF5600 system (AB SCIEX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Proteomics Using iTRAQ Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were labeled with an iTRAQ reagent eight-plex kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Two biological replications were performed for each timepoint, with a total of 12 samples prepared for quantitative proteomics experiments. After labeling, all samples were mixed and purified with a strong cation exchange chromatography column using an Agilent 1200 high-performance LC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and separated using LC using an Eksigent nanoLC-Ultra 2D system (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analytical Techniques for Biomolecular Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The main instruments used in this study were described as below: Sartorius PB-10 pH meter (Sartorius, Germany); Evolution 200 Ultraviolet–Visible Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA); BT25S Electronic Balance (Sartorius, Germany, d = 0.01 mg); Ultrapure Water Machine (Millipore, USA); Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS+ System with Image Lab software and Bio-Rad Mini-Protean® Tetra system; DMI3000B Inverted Research Grade Microscope with Leica Application Suite V4.4.0 (Leica, Germany); 5427R Microcentrifuge (Eppendorf, Germany); Triple TOF 5600 Mass Spectrometer fitted with Eksigent NanoLC-Ultra 2D system, Nanospray III source, and Protein Pilot 5.0 software (AB SCIEX, MA, USA); and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Agilent 1200, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Edwardasiella tarda Protein Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The desalted peptides sample was firstly separated to six fractions by Thermo DINOEX Ultimate 3000 BioRS with Durashell C18 column (5 μm, 100 Å, 4.6 × 250 mm) and then submitted to analysis by AB SCIEX nano LC-MS/MS (Triple TOF 5600 plus, AB SCIEX, Concord, ON, United States) with an Eksigent nanoLC-Ultra 2D System combined with the cHiPLC-nanoflex system as previously described setting (Lin et al., 2015 (link)). The raw data were interpreted by Proteinpilot 5.0 version against the Edwardasiella tarda database with following search parameters: iodoacetamide cysteine alkylation, trypsin digestion, iTRAQ peptide labeled, detected protein threshold > 0.05 and the false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. The identified proteins with at least two peptides matched were considered for further analysis. For quantification, the iTRAQ average reporter ion ratio ≥ 1.5 (increase) or ≤0.668 (decrease) and both p-value < 0.05 between two biological repeats were deemed to have a significant change.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proteomic Analysis of Secretome and Cellular Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Secretome samples were analyzed on a NanoLC 425 System coupled to a Triple TOF 6600 mass spectrometer (Sciex®) and the DG samples were analyzed on a nanoLC Ultra 2D system (Eksigent®) coupled to a Triple TOF 6600 System (AB Sciex®) using two acquisition modes: i) the pooled samples were analyzed by IDA and, ii) the individual samples by SWATH-MS mode. Detailed description of the protein extraction and digestion and Mass spectrometry procedure is provided in the Supplementary Methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Trypsin digested mixtures were analyzed by means of a platform consisting of a nano-liquid chromatographic system, Eksigent nanoLC-Ultra®® 2D System (Eksigent, part of AB SCIEX Dublin, Dublin, CA, USA) configured in trap-elute mode, coupled with a high-resolution mass spectrometer. Briefly, samples (0.8 µg injected) were first loaded on a peptide trap (200 µm × 500 µm ChromXP C18-CL, 3 µm, 120 Å) and washed with the loading pump running in isocratic mode with 0.1% formic acid in water for 10 min at a flow of 3 µL/min. The automatic switching of a ten-port valve then eluted the trapped mixture on a nano-reversed phase column (75 µm × 15 cm ChromXP C18-CL, 3 µm, 120 Å) through a 150 min gradient of eluent B (eluent A, 0.1% formic acid in water; eluent B, 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. In depth, gradient was: from 5–10% B in 3min, 10–40% B in 130 min, 40–95% B in 10 min and holding at 95% B for 7 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

2D Liquid Phase Chromatography Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fluid samples were fractionated by 2D liquid phase chromatography fractionation. Some of the fractions were combined according to the chromatogram. Two-dimensional chromatography was used to utilize the nano LC-Ultra 2D System (Eksigent, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of N2-Ethylguanine in DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The determination was performed as described previously (Moeller et al., 2013 (link)) and performed in the Swenberg laboratory. DNA was isolated using a NucleoBond DNA isolation kit, with small modifications. DNA was then reduced and digested as described previously (Yu et al., 2015 (link)). Following digestion, hydrolysed DNA was filtered and injected onto an Agilent 1200 HPLC fraction collection system equipped with a diode-array detector. dG and N2-EtdG were separated and eluted. The amounts of dG were quantified according to the UV peak area with a calibration curve. The amounts of N2-EtdG were detected and quantified with a calibration curve on an AB SCIEX Triple Quad 6500 mass spectrometer interfaced with an Eksigent nanoLC Ultra 2D system. The internal standard 15N-N2-EtdG was synthesized by the Swenberg lab. Chemicals were from Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!