The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 24.0 statistics package

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 24.0 Statistics package is a comprehensive software suite designed for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of tools for data management, analysis, and visualization. The core function of SPSS 24.0 is to enable users to perform advanced statistical techniques, such as regression analysis, hypothesis testing, and data exploration, to gain insights from their data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using spss 24.0 statistics package

1

Embryonic Development Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analysed with the IBM SPSS 24.0 Statistics package (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Percentage data were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Scored data (i.e., embryonic developmental stage) were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and, if necessary, two by two comparisons for two independent samples with the Mann–Whitney U-test. The total cell number per blastocyst was analysed to evaluate normality and homogeneity of variances by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Levene tests, respectively, and groups were compared by a mixed-model ANOVA. The ANOVA model included the main effects of temperature and supplementation and their interactions and the random effect of the replicate. When the ANOVA indicated a significant effect, the means were compared by Bonferroni’s test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05. The results are presented as mean ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences between groups were examined with the IBM SPSS 24.0 Statistics package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The continuous variables are presented as the means ± standard errors of the means (SEM). The mean percentage ± SEM of the binary variables was obtained by calculating the percentage in every well of each group and each of the replicates. The normality of the variables was examined using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Groups were compared using an unpaired Student’s t-test (Experiments 1 and 6), ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test (Experiments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7), or a Fisher’s exact test (Experiment 6), as applicable. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Oocyte Morphometrics and Embryo Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS 24.0 Statistics package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The mean ± SEM of binary variables (maturation, IVF efficiency, embryos with 2–8 cells, and blastocyst rates) was obtained by calculating the variable percentage in each replicate. All variables (maturation rates, fertilization efficiency, blastocyst rate, number of cells/blastocysts, and relative gene expression) were analyzed to evaluate normality by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and using a mixed-model ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. In vitro mature oocytes were clustered by total oocyte diameter, oocyte diameter, and thickness of ZP using iterative k-means cluster analysis to classify the oocytes of the dataset into a reduced number of subpopulations according to their oocyte dimensions. The effect of clusters, as fixed variable, on developmental stage (undeveloped, total embryos at the 2–8-cell stage, embryos arrested at the 2–8-cell stage, and blastocyst rates) were calculated and compared using a mixed-model ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni post hoc test. A logistic regression was performed to analyze the relationship between morphometric parameters (total oocyte diameter, oocyte diameter, and thickness of ZP) and blastocyst formation. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Weaning-to-Estrus Interval Effect Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were analysed with the IBM SPSS 24.0 Statistics package (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Percentage data were compared using Fisher's exact test. The continuous variables were evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality and groups were compared by ANOVA or Student's t-test, as appropriate. The ANOVA model included the main effect of weaning-to-estrus interval and the random effect of the replicate. When the ANOVA indicated a significant effect, the means were compared by Bonferroni's test. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. The results are presented as mean ± SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Embryonic Development Scoring Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The results were statistically analysed with the IBM SPSS 24.0 Statistics package (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Embryonic developmental stage scores were analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and, if necessary, two by two comparisons for two independent samples with the Mann-Whitney U-test. The rest of the parameters were analysed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to evaluate normality and then, groups were compared by a mixed-model ANOVA. The ANOVA model included the main effects of temperature and storage medium and their interactions (Experiment 1) or the main effect medium (Experiment 2) and the random effect of the replicate. When the ANOVA showed significant effects, the means were compared by Bonferroni's test. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimizing Embryo Development Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables (TCN, ICM, TE and ICM/TE) are expressed as the mean ± SD of four (Experiment 1) or six (Experiment 2) replicates. The mean ± SD of binary variables (cleavage, blastocyst rates, total efficiency and hatching rate) was obtained by calculating the variable percentage in every well of each group and in each replicate.
Variables were analysed to evaluate normality by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the groups were compared using a mixed-model ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS 24.0 Statistics package (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!