The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xradia micro xct 200

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The Xradia Micro XCT-200 is a high-resolution X-ray microscope system designed for non-destructive 3D imaging and analysis of materials. It utilizes X-ray computed tomography (XCT) technology to provide detailed 3D visualization and quantitative data about the internal structure and composition of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using xradia micro xct 200

1

Microstructural Analysis of H. subterraneus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One female and one male adult specimen of H. subterraneus were anesthetized and fixed in Bouin’s solution overnight. Preparations were washed in 70% ethanol, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and incubated in a 1% iodine solution (iodine resublimated in 99% ethanol; Carl Roth #X864.1) for 12 h. Preparations were washed several times in pure ethanol and critical-point-dried. Finally, samples were fixed on insect pins with super glue. Scans were performed with a Zeiss Xradia MicroXCT-200 (Imaging Center of the Department of Biology, University of Greifswald) at 30 kV, 6 W, and 4 s exposure time resulting in a pixel size of ca. 0.96 μm (male specimen) and 40 kV, 8 W, and 1 s exposure time resulting in a pixel size of ca. 0.95 μm (female specimen). Tomography projections were reconstructed using the XMReconstructor software (Zeiss Microscopy) resulting in images stacks (TIFF format). All scans were performed by using Binning 2 (resulting in noise reduction) and subsequently reconstructed by using Binning 1 (full resolution) to avoid information loss. Image stacks were further processed using Amira 6.4 (Thermo Fischer) and Drishti 2.4 [81 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

3D Microimaging of Arthropod Neurobiology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After anesthetization, two adult specimens were fixed in Bouin’s solution overnight. The subsequent preparation followed the protocol by Sombke et al. [33 (link)]. Preparations were rinsed in several changes of PBS (phosphate buffered saline, 0.1 M, pH 7.4), dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and incubated in a 1% iodine solution (iodine resublimated in 99% ethanol; Carl Roth #X864.1) for 12 h. Preparations were rinsed several times in pure ethanol and critical-point-dried. Finally, samples were fixed on insect pins with super glue. Scans were performed with a Zeiss Xradia MicroXCT-200. Dissected walking legs (pair 10) were scanned with a 10× objective lens resulting in a 2.19 μm pixel size; ultimate legs were scanned with a 4× objective lens unit resulting in 5.05 μm pixel size. Dissected ventral nerve cord ganglia associated with walking legs were scanned with a 20x objective lens resulting in a 0.93 μm pixel size (compare also Schendel et al. [24 ]). The ultimate leg associated ganglion 15 was scanned using a 20× objective lens resulting in a 1.09 μm pixel size. Tomography projections were reconstructed using the XMReconstructor software (Zeiss Microscopy) resulting in image stacks (TIFF format). All scans were performed using binning 2 (resulting in noise reduction) and subsequently reconstructed using binning 1 (full resolution) to avoid information loss.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Micro-CT Scanning of Contrasted Animal Heads

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micro-CT scans were performed using an X-ray microscope (Xradia MicroXCT-200; Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) that uses a 90-kV/8 W tungsten X-ray source and switchable scintillator-objective lens units as described by Sombke et al. (2015) (link). The heads of fixed animals (Bouin; two specimens) were contrasted in iodine solution (2% iodine resublimated (Cat. #X864.1; Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) in 99.5% ethanol), critical point-dried using a fully automatic critical point dryer Leica EM CPD300 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and scanned dry (scan medium air). Tomography projections were reconstructed using the reconstruction software XMReconstructor (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany), resulting in image stacks (DICOM format) with a pixel size of about 5.8 µm for the 4 × objective and 1.9 µm for the 10 × objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MicroCT Visualization of Arthropod Anatomy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After cold anesthetization, several specimens were fixed in Bouin’s solution overnight. The subsequent preparation followed the protocol by Sombke et al. [50 (link)]. Preparations were rinsed in several changes of PBS, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and incubated in a 1% iodine solution (iodine resublimated in 99% ethanol; Carl Roth #864.1) for 8–12 h. Then, tissues were rinsed several times in pure ethanol and critical-point-dried (Leica EM COD300). Finally, samples were fixed on insect pins with super glue. MicroCT scans (n = 9) were performed with a Zeiss XRadia MicroXCT-200 and analyzed. One overview scan (young male, 4x objective lens unit, pixel size 5.6521 μm) and two detailed scans of the head (two males, 10x and 20x objective lens units, pixel sizes 1.9649 μm and 0.9983 μm, respectively) were used for visualization and reconstruction in this contribution. Tomography projections were reconstructed using the XMReconstructor software (Zeiss Microscopy) resulting in image stacks (TIFF format). All scans were performed using binning 2 (resulting in noise reduction) and subsequently reconstructed using binning 1 (full resolution) to avoid information loss.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Micro-CT Scanning of Anesthetized Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two specimens were anesthetized in a freezer and fixed in Bouin's solution overnight (cf. [118] ). Preparations were washed in several changes of phosphate buffer, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (30 to 99%) and incubated in a 1% iodine solution (iodine resublimated in 99% ethanol; Carl Roth #X864.1) for 12 h. Preparations were washed several times in pure ethanol and critical-point-dried. Finally, samples were fixed on insect pins with super glue. Scans were performed with a Zeiss Xradia MicroXCT-200 (Imaging Centre of the Department of Biology, University of Greifswald) at 40 kV, 8 W. Scan parameters for depicted male specimen were (1) 0.5 s exposure time, 4 × objective lens unit resulting in 5.087 µm pixel size; (2) 4 s exposure time, 20 × objective lens unit resulting in 0.992 µm pixel size and (3) 8 s exposure time, 40 × objective lens unit resulting in 0.456 µm pixel size. Tomography projections were reconstructed using the XMReconstructor software (Zeiss Microscopy) resulting in image stacks (TIFF format). All scans were performed using binning 2 (resulting in noise reduction) and subsequently reconstructed using binning 1 (full resolution) to avoid information loss. Volume renderings were generated using AMIRA 6.4 (ThermoFisher).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Micro-CT Imaging of Dehydrated Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed specimens were dehydrated via an ascending ethanol series, incubated in solution of 2% iodine (resublimated; Carl RothGmbH&Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany; cat. #X864.1) in 99.5% ethanol for ∼48 h at ambient temperature, briefly rinsed in 99.5% ethanol (3–4× 10 min) and either transferred into a vial in ethanol (wet scan) or critical point-dried with a Leica EM CPD300 and glued with the posterior body pole on plastic welding rods (dry scan). Scans were performed with an Xradia MicroXCT-200 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH). Scan settings were individually optimized for each specimen, including objective choice (0.39×, 4×, 10×) according to size. Scans were performed under 40 kV/200 µA/8W, exposure times ranged from 0.4 to 1.5 s. Tomography projections were reconstructed using the XMReconstructor software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH) with TIFF format image stacks as output. All scans were performed with Binning 2 to reduce noise and subsequently reconstructed with Binning 1 (=full resolution) to avoid information loss. Processing and 3D visualization of the image stacks (including highlighting of cephalic appendages and removal of nontarget structures) were performed with Imaris (version 7.0.0., Bitplane AG, Switzerland) as described previously (Scholtz and Brenneis 2016 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

X-ray Imaging of Mating Pairs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mating pairs were incubated in a solution of 1% iodine in pure ethanol overnight. After washing steps in pure ethanol, the specimens were either kept in absolute ethanol or dried with either HMDS or via automated CPD (see also above) before being scanned in an Xradia MicroXCT-200 X-ray imaging system (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) at different magnifications and source voltages according to the specimen size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microstructural Analysis of Oulema Beetle Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
From the collection of the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (ZMUH) we received the syntype series of Oulemaseptentrionis (Weise, 1880), consisting of 11 specimens. From the collection of the Martin-Luther Universität Halle (MLUH) we received a syntype series of 14 specimens for Oulemaerichsonii (Suffrian, 1841). Three syntype specimens of Oulemaseptentrionis and one syntype specimen of Oulemaerichsonii were microCT-scanned with an Xradia Micro XCT-200 (Carl Zeiss X-ray Microscopy Inc.), using the 4× object lens units, at 40 kV and 8 W, with a pixel size of 5.36 µm. Tomography projections were reconstructed using the reconstruction software provided by XRadia. Volume rendering of image stacks was performed by using Amira 5.6.0 (FEI Visualization Science Group, Burlington, USA) applying the “Volren” or “Voltex” function. Habitus photographs were taken by means of a Canon EOS 6D with the Canon MP-E 65 mm macro lens in a BK PLUS Lab system by Dun Inc. The flagella of O.melanopus and O.duftschmidi were photographed using the Direct to Sensor Microscope Lens PageBreakwith a 10× Mitutoyo objective mounted on a Canon EOS 7D camera in a BK PLUS Lab system by Dun Inc. Obtained images stacks were processed using Zerene Stacker and Adobe Photoshop CS6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Micro-CT Imaging of Downstream Migrant Eye

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A block containing the eye of a downstream migrant, prepared as above for TEM imaging was used for microCT imaging. Micro X-ray Computed Tomography (μXCT) measurements were carried out using an Xradia© micro XCT200 (Carl Zeiss X-ray Microscopy, Inc.). This uses a microfocus X-ray source with a rotating sample holder and an imaging detector system consisted of coupling objective lens and CCD camera. The source consists of a closed x-ray tube with the tube voltage of 40 kV and a peak power of 10W. One data acquisition set consisted of 361 equiangular projections over 180 degrees. The exposure time was 1 s for each projection. The tomographic scan involved rotating the sample whilst recording transmission images on the CCD. Each projection image was corrected for the non-uniform illumination in the imaging system, determined by taking a reference image of the beam without sample. A cone beam filtered back-projection algorithm is used to obtain the 3D reconstructed image. The final three-dimensional reconstructed image size was 512 × 512 × 512 voxels with the voxel size of 7 μm along each side and Field of View (FOV) of (3.5 mm)3. A lateral image of the eye is presented to show the location and size of the annular ligament with respect to other ocular features.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

High-Resolution μCT Analysis of Bone Lacunae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bones were scanned using high-resolution μCT (Xradia, MicroXCT-200, Carl Zeiss X-ray Microscopy, Inc., Pleasanton, CA) with 1.1035 μm nominal voxel size (x-ray tube potential = 80 kVp, current = 100 μA), filter for 20x of 0.14–0.08 transmission (LE #6). The scan region of interest was a 1 mm3 cubic volume that contained both cortical and trabecular regions on the anterior side of the proximal tibia. All analyses were performed using Amira analysis software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Berlin, Germany). Lacunae in trabecular bone and cortical bone were analyzed separately. Lacunae were identified as porosities with a volume size of 100–800 μm3 [17 (link), 18 (link)]. Total lacunar volume per bone volume and average lacunar volume were determined for each of the trabecular and cortical regions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!