The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dylight 680 conjugate

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United Kingdom, China

DyLight™ 680 Conjugate is a fluorescent label that can be used to detect and visualize target proteins in various applications such as Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry. It has an excitation maximum at 682 nm and an emission maximum at 701 nm, making it suitable for detection with standard Cy5 or Alexa Fluor® 680 filter sets.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using dylight 680 conjugate

1

NF-κB Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FLS which were cocultured with pretreated articular cartilage were homogenized using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) reagent (Beyotime, Shanghai) supplemented with 1% phosphatase and protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher, CN) following the manufacturer's instructions. The protein concentration was assessed with BCA assay kit (Biosharp, China). Next, proteins were separated using electrophoresis, transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (Biosharp, China), and incubated at 4°C with primary antibodies for 16 hours. Then, the PVDF membrane with proteins was incubated with secondary antibodies. Fluorescent signals from protein were detected by Odyssey image system (Lincoln, NE). Primary antibodies used here included NF-κB (p65), inhibitor of NF-κBα (I-κBα), I-κB kinase β (IKK-β), CD147, and GAPDH were offered by Cell Signaling Technology (CST, 1 : 1000 dilution). Secondary antibodies used in this study included Anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (DyLight™ 680 Conjugate) and Anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (DyLight™ 680 Conjugate) were offered by Cell Signaling Technology (CST, 1 : 30000 dilution).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of VE-Cadherin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The equal amounts of protein extracts were separated through an 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel (SDS‐PAGE) and then transferred to a PVDF membrane (IPFL00010; Merck Millipore). Then, the membranes were incubated with Anti‐VE‐cadherin antibody (1:500; ab166715; Abcam) and Anti‐mouse IgG (H + L; DyLight? 680 Conjugate; #5470; Cell Signaling Technology). GAPDH was used as endogenous control, and the densitometry analysis was performed with ImageJ software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were prepared in Laemmli buffer with beta-mercaptoethanol, run on 4–20% pre-cast gels (Bio-Rad Mini-PROTEAN TGX Gels Cat# 4561095), transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using the Bio-Rad Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer System, blocked for 1 hour in 5% milk in TBS-T, then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Primary antibodies: anti-Ezh2 (Cell Signaling #5246 at 1:1000), anti-beta actin (Abcam ab213262 at 1:2000), anti-Stat3 (Cell Signaling #9139 at 1:500), and anti-phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705) (Cell Signaling #9145 at 1:2000). Membranes were washed with TBS-T before secondary antibody staining at room temperature for 1 hour. Secondary antibodies: anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (DyLight 800 4X PEG Conjugate, Cell Signaling #5151) and anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (DyLight 680 Conjugate, Cell Signaling #5470), both at 1:15,000. Membranes were imaged using a Licor Odyssey Infrared Imager, and Licor Image Studio software or ImageJ were used for densitometry analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunoblotting for GSR and Actin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed as previously described [26 (link)] using antibodies against GSR (N-Term) antibody (1 : 1000; Antikoerper-online.de, ABIN406391) and anti-actin antibody (1 : 4000; Millipore MAB1501). Secondary antibodies were anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (DyLight™ 800 Conjugate) and anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (DyLight™ 680 Conjugate) from Cell Signaling Technology™ (1 : 30000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Quantification of Protein Phosphorylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein was extracted from ∼30 mg snap‐frozen tissue as previously described (Mallinson et al. 2012). Total and phosphorylated 4EBP1 (Ser65) and p70S6k (Thr389) (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) and PDK4 (Millipore, UK) were analysed with anti‐mouse IgG (H+L) (DyLight 800 Conjugate, Cell Signaling) or anti‐rabbit IgG (H+L) (DyLight 680 Conjugate, Cell Signaling) as the secondary antibodies. Blots were scanned and bands identified using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI‐COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). Dual probing was used for total and phosphorylated proteins. Density volume was adjusted by subtracting the local background and then normalised with β‐actin (Sigma Aldrich, Dorset, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein concentration was measured using the Protein Assay Dye Reagent Concentrate (Bio-Rad). Protein lysates were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham) and blocked for 1 h in 5% BSA–TBS. After incubation with primary antibodies (overnight) and secondary antibodies (1h, RT), the membranes were washed and analyzed using the LI-COR Odyssey Infra-red Imaging System. Immunoreactivity bands were with Image J software or by the software included in the Odyssey Infra-red Imaging System. Primary antibodies used in western blotting with dilutions were as follows: monoclonal Anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma Aldrich, F1804, 1:2000), PRPF8 (Abcam, ab87433; 1:300), EFTUD2 (Abcam, ab72456, 1:200), ZNHIT2 (Abcam, ab126133; 1:500), RUVBL1 (Cell signaling #12300; 1:500), RUVBL2 (Cell signaling #8959; 1:500), PIH1D1 (Invitrogen #PA5-61482, 1:1000), RPAP3 (Invitrogen #PA5-58334D; 1:500). Secondary antibodies used were as follows: Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) (DyLightTM 680 Conjugate) (Cell signaling #5366; 1:15000) and Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) (DyLightTM 800 4X PEG Conjugate) (Cell signaling #5257; 1:15000). Conjugated antibodies used were StrepMAB-Classic HPR (IBA Lifesciences #2-1509-001; 1:30000) and Anti-polyHistidine-Peroxidase (Sigma Aldrich #A7058; 1:1000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Inflammatory Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After protein was extracted from renal tissues and cells, protein concentration was determined using the BCA method. After denaturation, 30–80 μg protein was separated using 12% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes using wet transfer. The membranes were blocked in 5% skim milk at room temperature for 1.5 h, and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies specific for: IL-1β (1:1000, #12242, Cell Signaling, Shanghai, China); IL-18 (1:1000, ab71495, Abcam, Shanghai, China); caspase-1 (1:500, GTX14367, GeneTex, United States); GSDMD (1:500, orb390052, Biorbyt, Cambridge, United Kingdom); and β-actin (1:5000, AC004, ABclonal, Wuhai, China). The membranes were then washed and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 2 h with the following secondary antibodies: anti-mouse IgG (H + L, DyLightTM 800 Conjugate, 1:15000, #5257, Cell Signaling, Shanghai, China) and anti-rabbit IgG (H + L, DyLightTM 680 Conjugate, 1:15000, #5366, Cell Signaling, Shanghai, China). A two-color infrared fluorescence imaging system was used to visualize protein bands. Protein concentration in the bands was quantified using ImageJ and normalized against that of β-actin, used as loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!