The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using airyscan lsm880

1

Quantifying GBM Tumorosphere-NK Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GBM tumorosheres in U-bottom well plate were imaged from 4 h to 48 h after addition of NK cells under ×100 magnification using inverted laser scanning confocal microscope with AiryScan LSM880 and ZEN black software (both Zeiss, Germany). CellTracker blue was excited with laser line at 405 nm and emission was detected between 410 and 485 nm. CellTracker green and PI were excited with laser line at 488 nm and emission was detected between 495 and 550 nm for CellTracker green and 570–700 nm for PI. Laser power, gain and offset were kept constant between experiments and conditions. Z-stacks of confocal sections were acquired with a step size of 2.99 μm. Z-stack images of tumorospheres were analyzed and reconstructed using ZEN blue software (Zeiss, Germany) and Imaris (Bitplane) software version 9.5.1 (Oxford Instruments, United Kingdom). The number of GBM cells and dead cells was quantitated with the spot detection tool of the Imaris software. For analysis of direct cellular interactions, surface 3D renderings were created using surface area module for NK cell (CellTracker blue) and GSLC (CellTracker Green) surface using Imaris software. We then obtained surface reconstructions of NK cell surface touching GSLC surface in gray color using surface-surface contact area plug in.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunofluorescence Staining of Virus-Infected Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spot slides were prepared by applying 20 μL of the virus-infected or non-infected cell suspension onto 12-well Teflon-coated slides. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min, washed three times with PBS, blocked, and stained with serum from a convalescent patient or serum from a healthy person for 30 min at 37°C at a dilution of 1:200. Goat anti-human immunoglobulin G conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate was used as the secondary antibody (Jackson Immuno Research Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA, USA). Nuclei and the cytoplasm were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole and Evans blue (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Fluorescent images were obtained and analyzed using laser-scanning confocal microscopy (Airyscan LSM880, Zeiss, Berlin, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing Embryonic Craniofacial Morphogenesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were sparsely electroporated with PCAGGS-memGFP and allowed to develop for 10 hours before being fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4° C. Embryos were washed three times in DPBS for 5 minutes before a segment of the head containing the BA2 stream (roughly from posterior to the otic placode to the midbrain) was excised with a scalpel. This smaller tissue piece was blocked in DPBS with 1% NGS and .1% Triton X-100 for 1 hour at room temperature before being incubated overnight at 4°C with rabbit anti-GFP (1:1000). Tissues were washed and incubated with alexa fluor 488 anti rabbit secondary (1:500), alexa fluor 562 phalloidin (1:500), and hoechst dye (1:5000) at room temperature for two hours. Tissues were mounted dorsal side up in Vectashield antifade mounting media. Small clay spacers were placed under the corners of the coverglass to prevent the tissue from being crushed. Samples were imaged with a Zeiss Airyscan LSM 880 with 405, 488, and 561 lasers, using a 63× objective in fast scan mode. Images were deconvolved using Zen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Super-Resolution Microscopy of Drosophila and C. elegans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Airyscan images of the Drosophila leg were acquired using a LSM880 confocal microscope with the Airyscan detector (Carl Zeiss) and equipped with a Plan-Apochromat 63x/NA 1.4 Oil M27 objective. The super resolution mode of the Airyscan was used with a calibration of 0.049 μm/pixel and a z-step of 0.220 μm. The solid state laser at 561 nm was used to image TagRFPt protein fused to myosin. The energy per pixel was equal to 4 μJ. Note that an automatic alignment to calibrate the Airyscan detector was done prior to the acquisition step. The reconstruction was done using the Airyscan data processing included in the ZEN software with the automatic strength (6 by default), similar to the Tikhonov parameter of the inverse filter used for RIM.
Airyscan images of the C. elegans were acquired using a Zeiss Airyscan LSM880 and a 63X/1.4 Plan Apochromat Oil DIC objective. Figure 2D shows a single focal plane from a Z-series. The super-resolution image was reconstructed using the Zeiss software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Super-resolution Confocal Imaging of Retina

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Retinas were oriented and imaged with the ganglion cell side up. Flat mounted retinas were imaged on a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope with an oil-immersion Zeiss 63X 1.4NA objective. Voxel sizes were either 0.05 μm or 0.1 μm per pixel (x, y-axes) and 0.2 μm or 0.4 μm per pixel (z-axis). Each optical section of a z-stack acquisition was averaged 2–4 times. Super-resolution confocal imaging with deconvolution (Huygens, SVI) was performed on select samples using the Leica TCS SP8 HyVolution 2 and the Zeiss AiryScan LSM 880. Voxel sizes were 0.035 μm per pixel (x, y-axes) and 0.13–0.16 μm/pixel (z-axis).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Confocal Microscopy Imaging of Retinal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Retinas were imaged and processed using a Zeiss confocal laser-scanning microscope with Airy Scan (LSM 880) with Zen software (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Confocal microscopy was performed with set parameters for laser power, photomultiplier gain, and offset, with a pinhole of diameter of 1 Airey unit for all samples with a × 40 oil immersion objective. Images of Z-stacks (10–15 optical sections with 0.5–1 μm step size) were acquired and maximum intensity projections of the Z-series were processed in Zen software. All images were compiled for publication in Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemistry of Transfected U2OS Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemical analysis, U2OS cells were cultured on 96-well optically clear plates (Greiner Bio-One), transfected as previously described, then fixed in 4% PFA (Electron Microscopy Sciences) diluted in PBS (Gibco) and washed with 0.3M glycine (Sigma) in PBS to quench PFA. Samples were blocked and permeabilized in a PBS solution containing 8% donkey serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch), 8% goat serum (Cell Signaling Technologies), and 0.3% Triton-X 100 (Sigma) for one hour, followed by primary antibody incubation in 1% BSA (Fisher Bioreagents), 1% goat serum, and 0.25% Triton-X overnight at 4°C. Samples were washed 3 times with PBS containing 0.1% BSA and 0.1% Triton-X 100 before incubating with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies in PBS with 0.05% Triton-X 100 and 1% BSA at room temperature for one hour. Cells were washed with PBS with 0.1% Triton-X, stained with DAPI, and then covered with Mounting Media (Ibidi) before imaging. Primary antibody, HA-Tag 6E2 (Cell Signaling, 2367), was used at a 1:100 dilution as per manufacturer’s instructions. Secondary antibodies used were goat anti-mouse IgG1-Alexa-Fluor 647 (Thermo Fisher, A21240) and Anti-Mouse IgG1 CF 633 (Sigma, SAB4600335). Confocal images were taken using a Zeiss Airyscan LSM 880 followed by image processing in Zen 2.3 (Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Cholinergic Neuron Synapses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Zeiss Airyscan LSM 880 confocal microscope was used to image VGluT2/TdTom+ or BDA/TdTom+ neuronal processes apposing SPNs (ChAT+ neurons) in thoracic IML. For each rostral (∼T1 – T6/7) and caudal (∼T6/7 – T13) region, 14–20 ROIs containing the IML, with at least 90 μm of inter-section distance, were selected to obtain a representative rostro-caudal distribution of IML regions and SPNs per mouse (n = 4). Each IML area was imaged (7–14 Z-stack images through a focusing range of 3.6–12.8 μm) at 63× magnification. Laser settings were optimized and replicated within each animal, for consistency between images. Left and right IML SPNs were selected and imaged based on visibility of at least one SPN soma per ROI. Z-stack images were then imported into Imaris software for 3D reconstruction and quantitative analysis using the “Surface” tool. Synaptic boutons (VGluT2) less than 1 μm from SPN somas were quantified and considered doubled labeled if there was overlap with TdTom+ surfaces. Similarly, doubled labeled contacts of BDA/TdTom+ were considered as synaptic boutons when less than 1 μm from SPN soma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Imaging Neuronal Protein Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were acquired under minimally saturating conditions, unless otherwise noted. LSM780 and LSM710 confocal microscopes (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) were used to collect image stacks of neuron cell bodies and proximal dendrites using a 63× oil objective and 2× digital zoom. Unless indicated otherwise, laser intensities and digital gain for quantitative analyses were set using signals from a representative control neuron, and then the same settings were used for the analyses of all other experimental conditions (Kv2.1-KD, proNRG2 variants, etc.). The image stacks were then projected in Z using the maximum intensity method. For the images collected in Figure 1A, laser intensity and digital gain were set for each individual coverslip and used for all images collected from that coverslip. The Z-projected superresolution images of proNRG2 puncta under Kv2.1 knockdown conditions shown in Figure 1G were acquired on an Airyscan LSM880 (Zeiss), with the laser intensity and digital gain for proNRG2 and Kv2.1 set using a representative neuron from a control coverslip. The representative images of proNRG2/VAP-transfected HeLa cells shown in Figure 3B,D were acquired as single planes, and laser settings were optimized for each image.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Super-resolution Confocal Imaging and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were imaged on a Zeiss Airyscan LSM 880 confocal microscope with a C-Apochromat 40x/1.2 W Korr M27 water immersion objective or a Plan-Apochromat 63x/1.4 OIL DIC M27 objective. For super-resolution imaging, an Airyscan detector was used79 . Volocity (version 6.3.1, PerkinElmer) and Zen (Zeiss) software were used to produce maximum intensity projections and 3D opacity renderings. Image analysis was performed on optical sections. For signal intensity profiles along the apical-basal axis and across tricellular junctions, the arrow tool in the Zen software was used. Anterior and posterior embryo widths measurements were made using the line tool in Volocity.
For F-actin signal intensity profiles across the apical surface of epiblast or ectoderm cells, Fiji’s freehand line tool with a width of ‘3’ was used80 (link). Because the size of the apical domain was different for each cell measured, distances were expressed as percentages, with 100% representing the total distance across the apical domain. To account for depth-dependent signal attenuation, F-actin signal intensity at the apical domain was normalised by mean F-actin intensity in the nucleus of the cell measured. In each experiment, for each genotype, three embryos were used for measurements and five cells were analysed per embryo. The LOWES method was used to fit a line to the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!