The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using oriole

1

2-D Protein Extraction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2-D protein extract analysis was carried out at the CICT following an adaptation of a previous report [40 (link)]. Protein extracts (125 µL) were loaded onto 7 cm immobilin strips, and the isoelectric focusing protocol was as follows: passive rehydration for 12 h at 20 °C (without pause); 50 V for 10 h (fast); 500 V for 1 h (fast); 1000 V for 1 h (fast); 4000 V for 30 min (linear); 400 V, 6000 V for 1 h (fast); and 500 V for 99 h (fast) (hold step), followed by separation in a 12% SDS–polyacrylamide gel as reported previously [40 (link)]. The gels were stained with Oriole (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and the image was captured with a Versadoc 4000 MP (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The gels were compared using the PDQuestTM Analysis software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of p53-Nucleosome Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the preparation of the p53-nucleosome complex, p53 (270 pmol) and the nucleosome (60 pmol) were incubated in reaction solution (25 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 250 mM NaCl, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 0.5 mM DTT) at 25°C for 30 min. The p53-nucleosome complex was fractionated on a non-denaturing 5–12% SuperSep™ Ace gel (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation) in 1 × TBE buffer (90 mM Tris, 90 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA), followed by ethidium bromide staining (first dimension). The gel was soaked in denaturing buffer (2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8) and 100 mM DTT), and was gently agitated at room temperature for 1 h. The gel was then analysed by 18% SDS-PAGE, followed by Oriole (Bio-Rad) staining (second dimension).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SDS-PAGE Protein Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were suspended in 1× Laemmli sample buffer (with 10 mM TCEP, 6 M urea, and 2% SDS), boiled for 10 min, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (NuPage 4–12% Bis-Tris, Invitrogen). Samples were prepared in parallel were either stained with Oriole (Bio-Rad) in preparation for mass spectrometry or immunoblotted using a 1 : 1000 dilution of polyclonal anti-horse spleen ferritin antibody produced in rabbit (Sigma-Aldrich), and imaged via standard chemiluminescence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating sHsps Assembly Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Luciferase (1 μM) was denatured at 44°C for 10 min in buffer D in the presence of 5 μM sHsps (1.66 μM IbpAEc and 3,34 μM IbpBEc in case of IbpABEc). To verify sHsps ability to form assemblies, 150 μl of each sample was applied on a 3.6 ml 10–60% glycerol gradient in buffer E (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Mg acetate, 2 mM DTT). Samples were then centrifuged at 10°C in a Beckman SW 60 rotor at 160,000 g for 1 h, fractions were collected from the top. Protein distribution in each fraction was verified by SDS–PAGE followed by Oriole (Bio-Rad) fluorescent staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Production and Purification of AAV7m8-GtCCR4-Venus Vector

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AAV7m8 GtCCR4-Venus vector was produced by the helper-free triple transfection procedure and purified using affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare)40 . Viral titers were determined by quantitative PCR using TaqMan technology (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). The purity of the vectors was assessed by 4–12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-acrylamide gel electrophoresis and fluorescent staining (Oriole, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The transfer plasmid (pAAV-hSyn-GtCCR4-Venus-WPRE and pAAV-hSyn-ChR2-Venus-WPRE) was constructed by inserting the human synapsin promotor sequence and GtCCR4-Venus fragment with the WPRE sequence into an AAV backbone plasmid, respectively (pAAV-CMV, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Separation and Quantification of IbpA and IbpB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel electrophoresis was performed using self-prepared 15% polyacrylamide gels or 4–20% ExpressPlus PAGE Gels (Genescript) according to standard procedures and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue or Oriole (Bio-Rad) fluorescent stain. Gel electrophoresis for separation of IbpAEc from IbpBEc was performed using 15% polyacrylamide gels supplemented with 6M Urea. Immunoblotting was performed according to the standard procedures, using rabbit anti-sera specific for IbpAs and IbpAB as primary antibody, and developed with SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Scientific), using (H+L) HRP conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Bio-Rad) as secondary antibodies. Developed immunoblots were scanned using ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad) and quantified with ImageLab (Bio-Rad) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing Membrane Purity via Density Gradients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the purity of membranes separated with sucrose density gradient centrifugation described above, OS- or IS-specific marker proteins were quantified in each separated membrane fraction. A marker of OS membranes, visual pigments, was quantified spectrophotometrically as described [4 (link), 9 (link), 10 (link)]. As the markers of membranes in the IS, F1 ATPase β subunit was used for mitochondrial inner membranes, TOM20 for mitochondrial outer membranes, calnexin for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes, and Na+/K+ ATPase α subunit for IS plasma membranes. The amount of F1 ATPase β subunit was quantified by fluorescent staining with Oriole (Bio-Rad Laboratories, California, USA) after SDS-PAGE using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a molar standard. The amounts of Na+/K+ ATPase α subunit and those of calnexin and TOM20 were measured by quantitative immunoblot analysis as described [5 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Visualizing and Analyzing Protein and DNA Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein in SEC fractions were visualised by SDS-PAGE through staining with Sypro Ruby (Thermo Fisher) or Oriole (Bio-Rad) fluorescent stain, scanned on a Chemidoc (BioRad), and analysed using ImageJ.26 (link),27 (link)
DNA samples were analysed using agarose gel electrophoresis on 1% (w/v) agarose gels in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetic acid, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) containing 0.01% SYBR® Safe DNA Gel Stain (Thermo-Fisher), and visualised using the Chemidoc.
The superoxide dismutase activity was assessed using the in-gel nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (NBT – Sigma-Aldrich, UK) negative staining assay.28 (link) The SEC eluate fractions were resolved on non-denaturing conditions 12% polyacrylamide gels and stained with 0.5 mM NBT, 28 mM TEMED, 28 μM riboflavin in 100 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0 buffer. The gel was incubated in 20 mL of NBT-riboflavin stain at room temperature in the dark for 20 min, and then visualised by exposing the gel to bright white light. The gels were scanned using a Bio-Rad Chemidoc system with a white light conversion screen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SDS-PAGE Protein Profiling of Cupressaceae and Pinaceae Pollen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis was used to determine the protein profile of the extracts. A total of 500 μg of lyophilized Cupressaceae pollen extracts and 150 μg of lyophilized Pinaceae pollen extracts were loaded per lane in SDS-PAGE gels under reducing conditions and stained with Oriole (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) or Coomassie blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell-free Protein Synthesis and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PUREfrex® 2.1 Kit (GeneFrontier, Chiba, Japan) was used as the PURE system reagent for cell-free protein synthesis. For protein synthesis, 5 or 10 µL of the reaction mixture containing 1 (DHFR, sfGFP, and trastuzumab HC) or 2 (Luc and ALP) ng/µL of template DNA was incubated at 23, 30, and 37 °C for the indicated duration, as described in the corresponding figure legends. Following synthesis, the reaction mixture was diluted 50- or 100-fold with water, and the fluorescence of the synthesized sfGFP was measured using a Varioskan™ plate reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For SDS-PAGE analysis, 0.2 or 0.5 µL of the reaction mixture was loaded onto 12.5% or 10–20% gradient gel, and electrophoresis was performed under reducing condition. The gels were stained with Oriole (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) or SYPRO Orange Protein Gel Stain (Thermo Scientific). Protein bands were visualized and quantified using ImageQuant Las imager (Cytiva, Tokyo, Japan) or WSE-6300 LuminoGraph III (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan) and CS Analyzer 4 software (ATTO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!