The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Enterobacter cloacae

Sourced in Portugal, United States

Enterobacter cloacae is a bacterial culture available from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). It is a Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped bacterium that belongs to the family Enterobacteriaceae. Enterobacter cloacae is commonly found in the human gastrointestinal tract and in the environment.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using enterobacter cloacae

1

Antimicrobial Evaluation of Kainari Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methanol extracts and the herbal teas of Kainari were evaluated for their in vitro antimicrobial activities using the standard antibiotics netilmicin, amoxicillin, and clavulanic acid in order to evaluate the sensitivity of the tested bacteria, while 5-fluorocytosine and amphotericin were used as sensitivity controls of the tested fungi [17 (link), 18 (link)]. A total of eleven microorganisms were assayed among which there were four Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), Streptococcus mutans, and Streptococcus viridans, and four Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Enterobacter cloacae (ATCC 13047), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 227853), as well as three pathogen fungi Candida albicans (ATCC 10231), C. tropicalis (ATCC 13801), and C. glabrata (ATCC 28838).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial Strains for SELEX Selection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bacterial strain used for SELEX selection was P. aeruginosa 692 (PA692) (ATCC 14502) obtained from New Zealand Culture Collection (Porirua, NZ). Other bacterial strains used were: P.aeruginosa PAO1 (ATCC 15692), Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (ATCC 19430), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883), Enterobacter cloacae (ATCC 13047), Listeria innocua (ATCC 33090) and Escherichia coli DH5α. Additional P. aeruginosa strains used in binding studies were clinical isolates PA1024 (catheter, urine), PA1205 (left thigh), PA1323 (cystic fibrosis sputum), PA1079 (tracheal aspirate), and PA1236 (blood) obtained from Environmental Science and Research Culture Collection (Porirua, NZ). All bacterial strains were cultured in standard Luria Broth (LB) medium at 37°C for 16 hours with aeration. After growth, the cells were diluted 1:100 in fresh LB and grown for 4 hours to allow them to reach exponential phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Potential of Z. rhoifolium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial activity of Z. rhoifolium (extracts, isolated alkaloids and chelerythrine derivative) was tested against seven Gram-positive bacteria: Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Bacillus cereus ATCC 33019, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923. Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615, Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 13048, Enterococcus spp. ATCC 6589; eight Gram-negative bacteria: Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumonia ATCC 13883, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 1304, Shigella sonnei ATCC 25931, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028, Burkholderia cepacia ATCC 17759, Morganella morganii ATCC 25829; and seven yeasts: Candida albicans ATCC 10231, Candida tropicalis ATCC 18803 Candida krusei ATCC 6258, Candida parapslosis ATCC 22018, Sacharomyces cerevisae ATCC 2601, Cryptococcus neoformans ATCC 28952, Cryptococcus gatti ATCC 2601.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibacterial and Antifungal Evaluation of Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The dried plant extracts were dissolved in water (10 mg/mL) and the antibacterial capacity was evaluated by the microdilution method, using the methodology previously described [64 (link)]. For the antibacterial assay, different Gram-positive bacteria were employed-Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538), Bacillus cereus (clinical isolate), Micrococcus flavus (ATCC 10240), and Listeria monocytogenes (NCTC 7973)-as well as Gram-negative bacteria-Enterobacter cloacae (ATCC 35030) and Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 13311). Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal (MBC) concentration, in mg/mL, were determined. Streptomycin was used as a positive control.
Antifungal activity was determined according to a previous protocol [65 (link)]. Five strains of fungi were employed: Aspergillus fumigatus (human isolate), Aspergillus versicolor (ATCC 11730), Aspergillus niger (ATCC 6275), Penicillium funiculosum (ATCC 26839), and Penicillium aurantiogriseum (ATCC 58604). MIC and minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC), in mg/mL, were calculated. Ketoconazole was used as a positive control.
The microorganisms employed for the analysis were deposited at the Mycological Laboratory, Department of Plant Physiology, Institute for Biological Research “Sinisa Stanković”, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Activities of Botanical Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibacterial and antifungal activities of the extracts were determined according to methods described in detail by Pires et al. (2018) [35 (link)] and Heleno et al. (2013) [46 (link)], respectively. Five Gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacter cloacae—ATCC 49741, Escherichia coli—ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa—ATCC 9027, Salmonella enterica—ATCC 13076, and Yersinia enterocolitica—ATCC 8610) and three Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus cereus—ATCC 11778, Listeria monocytogenes—ATCC 19111 and Staphylococcus aureus—ATCC 25923), besides two fungi strains (Aspergillus fumigatus—ATCC 204305 and Aspergillus brasiliensis—ATCC 16404) purchased from Frilabo (Porto, Portugal) were used. All work was performed with sterile materials handled under laminar flow. Prior to the assays, microorganisms were incubated (37 °C ± 0.5 °C for 24 h for bacteria and 25 °C ± 0.5 °C for 72 h for fungi) with appropriate media for each strain to reach a state of exponential growth. Negative controls of the extract and culture medium were prepared, and the antibiotics streptomycin, methicillin, ampicillin and antifungal ketoconazole served as positive controls. The antimicrobial potential was assessed as the minimum concentration required to inhibit the microorganism growth (MIB) and to cause bacteria or fungi death (MBC or MFC, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microbial Strain Collection for Antimicrobial Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Standard strains: Moraxella catarrhalis (GTC 01544), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883), Escherichia coli (K12), Salmonella typhimurium (ATCC 14028), Streptococcus pyogenes (ATCC 19615), Streptococcus agalactiae (ATCC 13813), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 12228), Neisseria lactamicus (ATCC 23970), Enterobacter cloacae, (ATCC 23355), Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633), Staphylococcus aureus (209P), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (IFO 3445).

Clinical strains: Moraxella catarrhalis, Bacillus cereus, Aeromonas hydrophila, Salmonella typhi, Vibrio cholerae, and Yersinia enterocolitica.

In addition to a sea urchin (Anthocidaris crassispina) derived Bacillus sp. which obtained from the Laboratory in Medical Plants Garden, Nagasaki University.

Fungal strains: the fungal strains used were Aspergillus niger (NBRC 33023), Penicillium crustosum (NBRC 33015), Schizophyllum commune (NBRC 30749), Trichophyton concentricum (NBRC 31068), and Candida albicans (NBRC 10108).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antimicrobial Evaluation of Diverse Microbes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The strains studied are recommended by other authors and they are
representative of a wide variety of microorganisms that belong to the main bacterial
and fungal groups.
Yeasts: Candida albicans ATCC 10231;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 2601;
Gram positive bacteria: Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633,
Bacillus cereus ATCC 11778, Micrococcus luteusATCC 9341, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 51299 and
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538;
Gram negative bacteria: Escherichia coli ATCC 25922,
Serratia marcescens LMI-UNIFAL, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
ATCC 27853, Proteus mirabilis ATCC 25922,
Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028 Enterobacter
cloacae
LMI-UNIFAL.
Mycobacteria: Mycobacterium bovis (BCG strain) ATCC
27289 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (H37) ATCC 27294.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microdilution Assay of Bacterial Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following bacterial strains were used in this study for the microdilution assay: Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433, Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603, Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615, Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 12386, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 and Staphylococcus saprophyticus ATCC 15305 (the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Virginia, United States). The antibiotic controls were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bacterial Strains Used in Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten bacterial strains used in this study were obtained from Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center. E. coli MDR was a generous gift from Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The E. coli O157:H7 (ATCC 35 150), E. coli (ATCC 8739), E. coli MDR, Salmonella Typhimurium (ATCC 14 028), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13 883), Acinetobacter baumannii (ATCC 17 978), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 10 145), and Enterobacter cloacae (ATCC 13 047) were used as representative gram‐negative bacteria. The Enterococcus faecium (ATCC 19 434), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25 923), and Staphylococcus aureus MRSA (ATCC 43 300) were used as representative gram‐positive bacteria. All strains were cultured in nutrient broth (NB) medium at 37 °C with shaking at 180 rpm before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bacterial Growth and Strain Cultivation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains were routinely grown with Mueller−Hinton broth at 37 °C with shaking at 225 rpm. Bacterial strains were obtained through ATCC or BEI Resources or from academic laboratories. The strains used were the following: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, S. aureus NRS70, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 33186, E. faecium ATCC 19434, Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 700294, Streptococcus pneumoniae R6, Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15692, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603, Proteus mirabilis ATCC 25933, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ATCC 13637, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 14990, E. coli K-12, and E. coli JW5503 (ΔtolC). The M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain was grown in Middlebrook 7H9 broth supplemented with 10% albumin-dextrose complex, 0.05% (v/v) Tween 80 at pH 7.4, (7H9/ADG pH 7.4) with shaking at 225 rpm at 37 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!