The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Novoseq platform

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States, China

The NovoSeq platform is a high-throughput DNA sequencing system designed for large-scale genomic research. It utilizes Illumina's proprietary sequencing-by-synthesis technology to generate high-quality DNA sequence data. The core function of the NovoSeq platform is to enable efficient and accurate parallel DNA sequencing of multiple samples simultaneously.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using novoseq platform

1

De novo Genome Assembly of Coridius chinensis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coridius chinensis was collected from Leshan, Sichuan, China (N29.52°, E103.43°). A single female adult of C. chinensis was prepared for de novo sequencing. Genomic DNA was extracted using the CTAB method, followed by purification using a Blood and Cell Culture DNA Midi Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). The genome assembly was performed using a hybrid sequencing approach, combining SMRT PacBio High-Fidelity (HiFi) reads, Illumina short reads, and Hi-C data. A long fragment library with an average insert size of approximately 15 kb was constructed from the extracted DNA. HiFi reads were generated using a PacBio Sequel sequencer (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, USA), and Hi-C data were generated by Illumina NovoSeq platform. Additionally, RNA-Seq reads were generated from one male and one female using Illumina NovoSeq platform. All library construction and sequencing procedures were performed at Grandomics Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Wuhan, China).
For Hi-C sequencing, fresh tissues were obtained from a female individual of C. chinensis. The sample was cross-linked with formaldehyde isolation buffer, and then digested with DpnII restriction endonuclease. After ligation, the DNA fragments were split into a size of 350-bp, and the chromatin conformation capture library was sequenced on an Illumina NovoSeq platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Illumina RNA-Seq Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The double‐stranded cDNA pool was amplified by PCR using NEBNext Ultra II Q5 Master Mix (NEB, #M0544L) with 0.5 µm Illumina RP1 primer and Illumina RPIx primer (where x is a number indicating the Illumina index). The thermocycling protocol began with 98 °C for 30 s followed by 12 cycles of 98 °C for 15 s, 62 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 60 s, and then incubated at 72 °C for 7 min. Three replicates of Illumina TruSeq library (Illumina, #20020594) for am or pm respectively were constructed starting with the same total RNA and ERCC Ex‐Fold Spike‐Ins with SiPAS libraries following the manufacturer’s instructions. The libraries were sequenced using the Illumina NovoSeq platform with PE150 sequencing format.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Streamlined Arachnid Genomic Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For newly sequenced specimens, 1–4 legs or tissue teased from a single chelicera from single specimens were used for DNA extractions using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit and the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Libraries were prepared and enriched following protocols outlined by Kulkarni et al.14 (link) and Miranda et al.75 (link) All pools were enriched with the Spider2Kv1 probe set14 (link) following the myBaits protocol 4.01 (Arbor Biosciences). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina NovoSeq platform. Assembly, alignment, trimming and concatenation of data were performed using the PHYLUCE pipeline (publicly available at https://phyluce.readthedocs.io/en/latest/). UCE contigs were extracted using the Spider2Kv1 probe set14 (link) to target 2,021 UCE loci (locus recovery listed in Table S1). To augment the UCE dataset with RNASeq datasets, we followed the assembly, sanitation, reading frame detection, and UCE retrieval pipeline outlined by Kulkarni et al.76 (link) Homology screening was performed by employing liberal (65%) and stringent (80%) probe-to-library identity and coverage mapping thresholds, following recent implementations.77 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Whole Exome Sequencing of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All tumor tissues were microscopically evaluated and assessed by a pathologist for tumor content. Genomic DNA was isolated from snap frozen tumor tissue and from matched blood prior to whole exome sequencing. Briefly, hybrid selection was performed with the Human All Exon kit SureSelect Target Enrichment System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) version 6 on the Illumina NovoSeq platform as paired-end 150-base pair reads. Alignment of read pairs were performed using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA MEM, http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/) to the human reference genome NCBI GRC Build 37 (hg19)30 (link). Using Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/), we marked the optical duplicates prior to base score recalibration with GATK version 4.1.4 for post-alignment data processing31 (link). To identify somatic variants from the normal and tumor BAM files, we used Mutect2 followed by annotating and prioritizing using VEP32 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Insect gDNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, 30–50 male or female flies per replicate were crushed in 500 μl homogenization medium (0.1 M Tris, 0.1 M EDTA,1%SDS, 0.5% diethylpyrocarbonate) and incubated at 65 °C for 30 min. The DNA was precipitated using 100 μl of 8 M potassium acetate and Isopropanol61 (link). The extracted gDNA is amplified using vgsc specific primers followed by adapter primers and run on Illumina NOVOseq platform. Data were analyzed using CRISPResso2 and CrispRVariants pipelines.
vgsc forward: 5′ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTagcttcatgatcgtgttcc 3′
vgsc reverse: 5′GACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCTgccatggttagaggcgataagtc 3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Extraction and Sequencing for Plant Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 20–40 mg leaf tissue was weighed out and pulverized using a SPEX® sample prep tissue homogenizer (SPEX Inc, Metuchen, NJ, United States). DNA was extracted using CTAB and isopropanol (Doyle and Doyle, 1987 ) and cleaned using a 2x ratio of AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, United States). DNA libraries were prepared using NEB Next Ultra II Library Prep Kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol (with half volume reactions) and with NEBNext Multiplex Oligos for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, United States) amplified with 9–11 PCR cycles (fresh samples) or 11–15 PCR cycles (herbarium samples). Yield and fragment size distribution were estimated using a Quantus fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI, United States) and a 4200 TapeStation system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, United States) respectively. Sequencing of DNA libraries was carried out on an Illumina NovoSeq platform with a paired end 150 bp configuration, by GeneWiz® (South Plainfield, NJ, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Targeted Whole-Exome Sequencing of Tumor and Germline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WES data for tumor sample generated from CD138+ cells collected after the second infusion. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were used as germline control. WES libraries generated using Twist Bioscience Human Core Exome Kit and sequenced as 75 bp paired-end reads with Illumina Novoseq platform. The average sequence coverage for targeted regions was 110× for tumor sample and 602× for germline DNA. We aligned paired-end reads using BWA-mem (v0.7.17-r1188)27 to GRCh38. We followed GATK (v4.0.11) best practice to mark duplicated reads with MarkDuplicates function and base quality score recalibration with ApplyBQSR28 . Mutect229 was used to call mutations. Only mutation calls with at least 10× coverage for tumor and germline samples and passed FilterMutectCalls function were annoted using Variant Effect Predictor from Ensembl (v100). Allele-specific copy number calls as well as ploidy and purity of the sample were analyzed using FACETS (v0.6.1) (Fraction and Allele-Specific Copy Number Estimates from Tumor Sequencing)30 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Fusarium filiformis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
F. filiformis strains collected in the study are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. In total, 232 strains of F. filiformis strains were collected in this study, including 157 cultivars and 75 wild strains. To obtain a comprehensive understanding of the genetic variation present within the F. filiformis, we selected cultivars from various countries, although a significant proportion of the strains were sourced from China. The mycelia were grown in solid Potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium at 25 °C until they reached full growth. Genomic DNA was extracted from mycelia using the CTAB method [27 ]. A Nanodrop and 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis were used to assess the concentration and integrity of the DNA solution. Whole-genome sequencing libraries were prepared using NexteraXT reagents (Illumina). The Illumina Novoseq platform from Novogene was then used for sequencing the DNA samples. Briefly, approximately 2 μg of DNA from each sample was used for fragmentation by Biorupter (high power: (15 s, on/90 s, off), six cycles) and end preparation by NEXT flex TM End-Repair. After PCR amplification (10 cycles), the library was purified using AMPure beads. Qubit was used to evaluate the quality and quantity of each library. The sequencing statistics of the samples are summarized in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multi-Omics Transcriptome Analysis Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from tumor, matched normal tissue, and cell lines using the RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The integrity of RNA was determined by electrophoresis using the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, USA). Whole transcriptome sequencing of cell lines was performed on the Illumina NovoSeq platform (Novogene, Singapore) using the standard Illumina RNA-seq protocol. The reads were aligned to the human genome hg19 RefSeq reference transcriptome by STAR33 (link). Transcript abundance estimation was performed using RSEM34 . Differentially expressed genes were identified using DESeq235 (link). For each gene, read counts were represented as “transcripts per million” (TPM) and were normalized for both sequencing depth and gene length. For tumor and matched normal tissue transcriptomic analysis was performed using the Illumina Ampliseq Transcriptome Human Gene Expression Panel (Illumina, San Diego, CA, US) following macrodissection of a representative section from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) Hallmark gene set36 (link). A gene set is significantly enriched if its Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) has a False Discovery Rate (FDR) q-value below 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Gut Microbiome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In brief, DNA was isolated using the Magnetic Stool DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocols, which were quantified by Qubit® dsDNA Assay Kit in Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, USA). The shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed on the Illumina NovoSeq platform, generating on average 20 million reads (~6 Gb) per sample. High-quality reads were screened by trimming low-quality (Q-Score <20) nucleotides and potential human contaminants were removed using Bowtie2 (version 2.2.4). Metagenomics taxonomical annotation was performed using DIAMOND (V0.9.9.110) and used a library of NCBI blast to provide pan-microbial (bacterial, archaeal, viral and eukaryotic) quantification at the species level. All samples were compared and analyzed at the species level by relative abundance. The shotgun metagenomic DNA sequencing data from fecal samples were obtained from Beijing Novogene Biotechnology Co., Ltd, China.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!