The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

25 protocols using pharmalyte

1

Isoelectric Focusing Separation of Charge Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mixed amphoteric electrolyte was used for separating the charge variants. Briefly, 35 μl 1% methylcellulose solution was mixed with 3 μl of Pharmalytes (pH 3–10) (GE Healthcare) and 1 μl of Pharmalytes (pH 8–10.5) (GE Healthcare), a certain volume of prepared sample solution, 10 μl 200 mM IDA (iminodiacetic acid), 5 μl of Arginine and 1 μl of each pI markers (4.05 and 10.45) (Protein Simple), and ultra-pure water in a 1.5 ml centrifuge tube to make a final volume of 200 μl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cysteine Redox Optimization for THIOMAB iCIEF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis by iCIEF was carried out using an ICE-280 instrument from ProteinSimple (San Jose, CA). All samples were buffer exchanged into 20 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid at pH 7.0. The buffer-exchanged samples were diluted to a final concentration of 0.25 mg/mL in a solution containing 2.5 M urea, 3% carrier ampholytes (70% Pharmalytes [GE Healthcare] pH 8-10.5, 30% Pharmalytes pH 5-8), 0.35% methylcellulose, 0.88% 1 N HCl, and pI markers. In the case of THIOMAB™, cysteinylation and glutathionylation can be formed at the engineered and unpaired cysteines through disulfide bonds during the cell culture process, which often result in multiple charge variant peaks during iCIEF analysis. Therefore, the THIOMAB™ samples in this study were treated with 10% cysteine/cystine (10 mM/40 mM) redox pair and incubated at 37 C for 2 h before buffer exchange to simplify the charge profile of THIOMAB™ on iCIEF.
The sample-ampholyte mixture was introduced into the capillary under pressure and then focused at 1500 V for 1 min followed by 8 min at 3000 V, at which time a charge-coupled device camera
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Charge Variant Analysis of mAb1 by icIEF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mAb1 IEC fractions were assessed by icIEF using a ProteinSimple Maurice (San Jose, CA, USA) with a 5 cm-long fluorocarbon-coated capillary cartridge (100 μm ID). The ampholyte solution consisted of a mixture of 0.35% methylcellulose, 2.5 M urea, 0.5% Pharmalyte (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) pH 3–10 carrier ampholytes, 2.65% Pharmalyte pH 8–10.5 carrier ampholytes, 0.2% pI marker 7.55, and 0.2% pI marker 9.77 in purified water. The anolyte was 80 mM phosphoric acid, and the catholyte was 100 mM sodium hydroxide, both kept in 0.1% methylcellulose. Fifty microliters of samples were mixed with 200 μL ampholyte solution and then focused at 1.5 kV for 1 min, followed by a potential of 3 kV for 10 min. An image of the focused mAb1 charge variants was obtained by passing 280 nm ultraviolet (UV) light through the capillary and into the lens of a charge-coupled device digital camera. This image was then analyzed to determine the distribution of the charge-related variants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isoelectric Focusing and SDS-PAGE of Fluorescent Protein Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cy2-, Cy3- and Cy5-labeled samples were mixed together, and rehydration buffer was added (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 0.5% pharmalytes (GE Healthcare), 40 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 0.002% bromophenol blue) to a final volume of 450 μl and used to rehydrate an immobilized pH gradient strip (24 cm; pH 3–10NL; GE Healthcare) by passive diffusion at 20°C for 12h. Isoelectric focusing was performed on an IPG Phor 3 horizontal electrophoresis system (GE Healthcare) with a program of 0.5 kV for 1h, holding at 0.5 kV for 5 h, ramping to 1 kV over 1 h, ramping to 8 kV over 3 h, holding at 8 kV until 60 kV*h, and holding at 0.5 kV for 4 h. Each focused strip was then equilibrated in two steps: 15 minutes in a reducing equilibration buffer (6 M urea, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8 with 30% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 0.01 bromophenol, and 10 mg/mL DTT), followed by 15 minutes in an alkylating equilibration buffer where DTT was replaced by 25 mg/mL iodoacetamine. The equilibrated IPG strips were then placed directly on top of polymerized 12% SDS gels and sealed with an agarose sealing solution (25 mM Tris, 192 mM, glycine, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% (w/v) agarose, and 0.02% bromophenol blue). Gels were run in cooled tanks with DIGE buffer on an Ettan Dalt-6 (GE Healthcare) at 1 W per gel until the bromophenol blue dye front reached the bottom of the gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Analysis of GBM U87 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GBM U87 cells were treated with 200 μM of TMZ or DMSO for one week or two and subjected to total cellular proteins extraction using lysis buffer containing 4% (w/v) CHAPS (Sigma-Aldrich), 8 M urea (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), 1% (v/v) Pharmalytes (GE Healthcare), 2 mg/mL DTT (Sigma-Aldrich), and trace amounts of bromophenol blue (Sigma-Aldrich) followed by sonication on ice. Next, lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 1 h at 4 °C. Subsequently, protein concentration of supernatants was determined by the modified Bradford method, and aliquots of protein samples were stored at −80 °C. Differentially expressed proteins were separated using two dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry. The 2-DE was performed using 4–7 pI immobiline strips and gels were then subjected to silver staining to visualize proteins. Protien spots of interest were dissected from the gels and the subjected to Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/TOF MS). Experiments were repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isoform Identification of GMOP-IFN Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify the different isoforms of GMOP-IFN and its de-immunized variants, a 1 mm thick 8% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel with 7 M urea was prepared. To establish the pH range, a mix of 30% (w/v) 5–7 ampholytes and 70% (w/v) 2–4 ampholytes (Pharmalyte, GE Healthcare, USA) was used. The gel was prefocused at 2000 V, 10 W and 100 mA for 30 min. Then, 5–20 μl samples were applied over a strip located at 1 cm from cathode and electrophoresis was performed under the conditions previously described for the prefocusing step for 90 min. Finally, separated components were visualized by Coomasie blue staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Capillary isoelectric focusing of deamidated DBF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the charge variants of DBF protein after forced deamidation at pH 9.5, capillary isoelectric focusing was performed. DBF protein samples were diluted in water to 1 mg/mL. The protein was mixed with 1% methyl cellulose (ProteinSimple), 3—10% Pharmalyte (GE Healthcare), 500 mM DTT (DL-Dithiothreitol) (Sigma Aldrich), and appropriate pI markers of 4.6 and 9.5 (ProteinSimple). Next, the diluted samples were injected into a fluorocarbon-coated capillary cartridge using an iCE3 (ProteinSimple) system autoinjector. Samples were prefocused for 1 min at 1500 V and then focused for 5 min at 3000 V followed by wash period of 90 s. The focusing patterns were then captured by a CCD camera at 280 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

2D Proteomic Analysis of Bacterial Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for 2D proteomic analysis were prepared as follows. Bacterial cultures were grown in LB at 37°C for 18 h and diluted 1:100 with 30 ml of pre-warmed LB. They were further incubated at 37°C with aeration and shaking at 250 rpm until optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.85. Cells were then placed on ice for 20 min and harvested at 4°C. Bacterial pellets were resuspended in a sample buffer consisting of 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% (w/v) CHAPS, 1% (w/v) DTT, 2% (v/v) pharmalyte (pH 3.5–10, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, United States), and 1 mM benzamidine. These samples were sent to Genomine Inc (Pohang, Korea) for 2D electrophoresis, normalization, and protein identification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Charge Variant Analysis of Purified Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified samples were analyzed for charge variants on an iCE3 (Protein Simple) with a FC Column Cartridge (Protein Simple). Samples were prepared by mixing with an ampholyte solution consisting of urea, methyl cellulose, and the appropriate Pharmalyte (GE). Charge variants were detected at 280 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isoelectric Focusing for Protein Separation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First dimensional protein separation with isoelectric focusing was conducted on a Protean IEF Cell (BioRad, Hercules, CA, United States) with 57 μg of total protein (consisting of 30 μg labeled sample and 27 μg labeled IPS) per immobilized pH gradient (IPG) strip [ReadyStrip IPG Strips 24 cm pH 3-10 non-linear (BioRad)]. The rehydration mix containing both sample and IPS was brought to a final volume of 450 μl and a final concentration of 5 M urea, 0.5%w/v CHAPS, 0.5% v/v Pharmalyte (GE Healthcare), and 12 μl/ml of DeStreak reagent (GE Healthcare). The strips were overlayed with mineral oil (Bio-Rad) and actively rehydrated at 50 V for 12 h and afterward focused by increasing the voltage step by step up to 8000 V within 17 h. The procedure was carried out at 20°C using a current limit of 30 μA per strip. Focused strips were stored at -80°C until further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!