The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2 protocols using sunitinib su11248 malate

1

Renal Cancer Cell Lines: Culturing and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The renal cancer cell lines (786-O, 769-P, ACHN, Caki-1, Caki-2) and human renal tubular epithelial cell line (HK-2) were purchased from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) and cultured in RPMI 1640 (786-O, 769-P); McCoy’s 5A (Caki-1, Caki-2); DMEM (ACHN) and DMEM/F12 (HK-2) (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). PFK15 (PFK-015; Selleck, China), 2-Deoxy-d-glucose (2-DG; Selleck, China), Sunitinib (SU11248) malate (Sunitinib; Selleck, China), and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma–Aldrich, USA) were also used. Cells were transfected with control siRNA and siRNA-PFKFB3 using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). QRT-PCR and Western blot assays were used to evaluate the efficiency of siRNA interference. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). HiScript III All-in-one RT SuperMix (Vazyme, China) was used for cDNA synthesis. qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, China) using StepOne Plus (Applied Biosystems, USA) and LightCycler 480 PCR instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primers and siRNA Oligo used are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Generating Sunitinib-Resistant Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sunitinib (SU11248) malate was purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX). For the development of sunitinib-resistant cells, parental cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of sunitinib. In brief, the RCC cell lines were treated with varying concentrations of sunitinib (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 20 and 50 μM). With the passage of time of every 4 days, it has been observed that A498 cells showed stable growth and eventually became confluent at a concentration of 2 µM, while 798-O cells showed stable growth to confluence at a concentration of 4 µM. It can be assumed that cells that grew to confluence had developed stable sunitinib-resistance after a period of 4 months or > 20 passages. The cells were constantly in sunitinib containing medium throughout the selection process.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!