The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Titan3 themis g2

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific

The Titan3 Themis G2 is a high-performance transmission electron microscope (TEM) designed for advanced materials analysis. It features a stable and precise electron optical system, enabling high-resolution imaging and analytical capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using titan3 themis g2

1

TEM Imaging and Diffraction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were examined in an FEI Titan3 Themis G2 operated at an accelerating voltage of 300 kV, equipped with a field emission gun (X‐FEG) operating at an extraction voltage of 4.5 kV and a monochromator. HR images and diffraction patterns were acquired using a Gatan OneView CMOS camera and an FEI BF‐STEM detector was used to acquire SMF images. The pixel size at each magnification and diffraction pattern had previously been calibrated using a standard of gold nanoparticles on graphite.
The electron flux in CTEM was controlled by adjusting the monochromator focusing lens and the C2 condenser lens and was set to 0.08 e/(Å2 s) when searching for areas of interest at low magnification and acquiring selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns. In STEM, the total electron fluence per image was controlled by altering the magnification, reducing the probe current to 5 pA using the monochromator focusing lens and setting the dwell time per pixel to 10 µs. The electron flux and measured probe current in CTEM and STEM were based on a flu‐cam current reading which had been previously calibrated using a Faraday cup, and therefore reported uncertainties in the electron flux and probe current measurements are readout error from the flu‐cam. In TEM, this corresponds to ±0.01 e/(Å2 s) and in STEM ±1 pA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis of Engineered Nanomaterial Cellular Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ENM cellular uptake was confirmed by TEM imaging. TT1 cells, the primary focus of this study were exposed to ENM were fixed, embedded, sectioned and imaged as previously described [27 (link)]. The analysis was performed with a FEI Titan3 Themis G2 operating at 300 kV fitted with 4 EDX silicon drift detectors, and a Gatan One-View CCD. EDX spectroscopy and mapping to identify potential heavy metal contamination was undertaken using Bruker Esprit v1.9 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Bi2Te3 Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structures as‐prepared Bi2Te3 films were characterized by X‐ray diffraction (XRD, D/max 2500 Rigaku Corporation, CuKα radiation). The surface morphology and cross‐section microstructures were investigated by SEM (Zeiss supra 55). The compositions of Bi2Te3 films are analyzed by an EDS (Bruker Quantax 200). Samples for cross‐sectional TEM analysis were fabricated by a dual‐beam SEM‐FIB (focused ion beam, Scios, FEI). The crystal structures of as‐prepared Bi2Te3‐based flexible thin films were also investigated by the transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI, Titan3 Themis G2). The chemical bonding was investigated by Raman spectra measurement system (Horiba Jobin Yvon). X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Escalab 250XI) was used to study the valence states of the composing elements. Carrier concentration (ne) and mobility (µ) values were recorded from the Hall measurement system (HL5500PC, Nano metrics). The σ and S of Bi2Te3 film were simultaneously measured by the SBA458 (Nezsch). The error bars of the measured data were determined from the SBA458 (5% for S, 5% for σ, and 10% S2σ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative STEM and CTEM Electron Beam Sensitivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A comparative study of electron beam sensitivity in STEM and CTEM was performed in a FEI Titan 3 Themis G2. Phase contrast (PC) CTEM lattice images were taken at 80 kV and 300 kV with an electron flux of 3.8x10 5 e -nm -2 s -1 at 380,000 times magnification on a Gatan OneView CCD. Phase contrast STEM images were taken at 300 kV with a probe current of 40 pA, 16
µs dwell time and a specimen pixel size of 57.8 pm giving an averaged fluence of 1.2x10 6 e - nm -2 per scan, calculated by the following equation.
Where t is the dwell time, I is the probe current, e -is the charge of an electron (1.602x10 -19 C) and ds is the pixel size
The probe convergence semi angle was 10 mrad, giving a 1.4 Å probe, the FEI bright field detector collection semi angle was set to circa 7 mrad at a camera length of 460 mm, providing phase contrast with the optimum collection efficiency for an uncorrected STEM (Sader et al., 2010) (link). The FFTs of both CTEM and STEM images were compared to investigate changes in crystallinity induced by electron irradiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!