The electron flux in CTEM was controlled by adjusting the monochromator focusing lens and the C2 condenser lens and was set to 0.08 e−/(Å2 s) when searching for areas of interest at low magnification and acquiring selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns. In STEM, the total electron fluence per image was controlled by altering the magnification, reducing the probe current to 5 pA using the monochromator focusing lens and setting the dwell time per pixel to 10 µs. The electron flux and measured probe current in CTEM and STEM were based on a flu‐cam current reading which had been previously calibrated using a Faraday cup, and therefore reported uncertainties in the electron flux and probe current measurements are readout error from the flu‐cam. In TEM, this corresponds to ±0.01 e−/(Å2 s) and in STEM ±1 pA.
Titan3 themis g2
The Titan3 Themis G2 is a high-performance transmission electron microscope (TEM) designed for advanced materials analysis. It features a stable and precise electron optical system, enabling high-resolution imaging and analytical capabilities.
4 protocols using titan3 themis g2
TEM Imaging and Diffraction Protocols
The electron flux in CTEM was controlled by adjusting the monochromator focusing lens and the C2 condenser lens and was set to 0.08 e−/(Å2 s) when searching for areas of interest at low magnification and acquiring selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns. In STEM, the total electron fluence per image was controlled by altering the magnification, reducing the probe current to 5 pA using the monochromator focusing lens and setting the dwell time per pixel to 10 µs. The electron flux and measured probe current in CTEM and STEM were based on a flu‐cam current reading which had been previously calibrated using a Faraday cup, and therefore reported uncertainties in the electron flux and probe current measurements are readout error from the flu‐cam. In TEM, this corresponds to ±0.01 e−/(Å2 s) and in STEM ±1 pA.
Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis of Engineered Nanomaterial Cellular Uptake
Characterization of Bi2Te3 Thin Films
Comparative STEM and CTEM Electron Beam Sensitivity
µs dwell time and a specimen pixel size of 57.8 pm giving an averaged fluence of 1.2x10 6 e - nm -2 per scan, calculated by the following equation.
Where t is the dwell time, I is the probe current, e -is the charge of an electron (1.602x10 -19 C) and ds is the pixel size
The probe convergence semi angle was 10 mrad, giving a 1.4 Å probe, the FEI bright field detector collection semi angle was set to circa 7 mrad at a camera length of 460 mm, providing phase contrast with the optimum collection efficiency for an uncorrected STEM (Sader et al., 2010) (link). The FFTs of both CTEM and STEM images were compared to investigate changes in crystallinity induced by electron irradiation.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!