The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software version 24.0 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS software version 24.0 for Windows is a comprehensive and robust data analysis tool. It provides a wide range of statistical techniques for data manipulation, analysis, and visualization. The software is designed to handle complex data sets, enabling users to uncover insights and patterns within their data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using spss software version 24.0 for windows

1

Comparative Analysis of Patient Cohort

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patients’ cohort was described in its clinical and demographic features using descriptive statistics techniques. Normality of continuous variables was checked using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Quantitative variables were expressed as median and range and qualitative variables as absolute and percentage frequency. Chi square test (or Fisher exact test when necessary) and Mann Whitney non-parametric tests were used to compare categorical and quantitative un-paired data. The variables that reached the statistical significance at the univariate analysis entered the logistic regression. The analyses were performed using SPSS software version 24.0 for Windows.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ANOVA Analysis of Variance Using SPSS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
General Linear Models (GLM) procedure of SPSS software (version 24.0) for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform analysis of variance (ANOVA). Data were presented as mean ± standard error and differences among treatment means were compared using Tukey’s HSD test at P < 0.05 significance level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Glue versus Suture for Corneal Repair

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All variables were analysed descriptive first. Numerical variables were summarized by mean with SD, or median with range, whichever applicable; while categorical variables were summarized by frequency tables. Kaplan–Meire method with log-rank test was used to compare the time to recurrence between glue group and suture group. K–M estimate was used for recurrence rate at XX days. Visual acuity was expressed as LogMAR for statistical analysis. Mann–Whiney U-test was used to compare the postoperative visual outcomes between glue and suture group; while Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to compare the visual outcomes between the postoperative measurement and the preoperative measurement. A p-value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 24.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Bacteriobilia Relationship

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Qualitative variables were described by relative (%) and absolute (f) frequency distribution. Quantitative variables were described by mean and standard deviation (SD). To analyze the association between the prophylactic use of the antibiotic and the positivity of bacteriobilia, the Chi-square test was performed. The Odds Ratio was calculated and its significance was determined when the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) did not include the value 1.
A Logistic Regression model was built to analyze the probability of positive culture by the Enter method. The X2 statistic was used to determine whether the variables inserted in the Logistic Regression model were significant to predict the outcome, and Nagelkerke’s R2 was used to determine the percentage of variation in the outcome variable explained by the model. SPSS software version 24.0 for Windows was used for all analyses, with a significance level of 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SPSS software (version 24.0) for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, Il, USA) was used
for the statistical analysis. Differences among groups or time points were
determined using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s honest
significant difference test. Different significance levels have been indicated
using different lowercase letters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Continuous Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± SD, whereas variables that with skewed distribution were reported as median (Q1, Q3). For data that follow normal distribution, we used paired t test for statistical comparison, and for data that do not follow normal distribution, we employed Wilcoxon signed-rank test for comparison. For comparisons between subgroups, we use ANOVA with Tukey's test or Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparison test as appropriate. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 24.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genetic Factors Influencing Immunity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 24.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R statistical software (version 3.51). Two-tailed P (or P.adjusted) < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results of continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while categorical variables were reported as a number with a percentage. Comparison of basic characteristics between two groups was done by using the Student’s t-test for continuous variables which fulfilled homogeneity of variance and by using a chi-square test for categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between rs35705950 SNP and genes enriched in the immunity pathway. Results of logistic regression are presented as odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Atherosclerosis and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 24.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, or as median (25th–75th percentiles), if not normally distributed. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t test or the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages and were analyzed using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. The effect of various variables on AS was calculated by univariate regression analysis. In these analyses, variants with unadjusted P < .1 were determined as confounding factors and were included in multivariate regression analyses to determine the independent predictors of AS. Spearman correlation analysis was used to identify factors associated with CIMT in the patient group. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent associates of CIMT in the patient group. A 2-tailed P < .05 was considered statistically significant during the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Analysis of Hematological and Coagulation Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Friedman test and the Wilcoxon sign-rank test with Bonferroni correction were used to compare WBC, Hb, platelet counts, MPV, PDW, PCT, TAT, FDP, and d-dimer levels, as appropriate. The paired t-test was used to compare the results from flow cytometry. Data with normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviations (SD), otherwise it was expressed as median (25 percentile – 75 percentile). In addition, data in the coagulation study of only seven cases were expressed as mean ± standard errors (SE).
All variables with a p-value < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using R software, version 3.4.3 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), SPSS software, version 24.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Preterm Infant BISC Outcome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 24.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For group comparisons of normally distributed continuous data, Student's t‐tests were performed; for data not adhering to a particular distribution, Mann–Whitney U tests were applied. Categorical data were compared using the chi‐square test. Data are presented as numbers with percentages, medians with interquartile range or means with standard deviation or 95% confidence intervals and their associated effect sizes. A logistic regression analysis was used to assess differences between preterm infants with normal and poor BISC outcome and potential confounders. Correlations were analysed using Kendal's Tau correlation coefficient. Results were regarded as statistically significant when two‐sided p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!