The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Axioskop 2 microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Spain

The Axioskop 2 microscope is a high-performance optical system designed for a variety of laboratory applications. It features a stable, ergonomic design and delivers bright, high-contrast images. The microscope is equipped with a range of objectives and condensers to accommodate different sample types and magnification requirements. Its core function is to provide users with a reliable and versatile platform for detailed observation and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

316 protocols using axioskop 2 microscope

1

Immunohistochemical Quantification of IL6 in Mouse Aorta

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse distal thoracic aortas were fixed in 10% formalin and paraffin embedded. Six micrometer sections were boiled for 20 min in Dako Target Retrieval Solution Citrate pH 9 (Aligent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and then blocked in 5% goat serum in PBS-T for 45 min at room temperature. Primary antibody against IL6 (5 μg/mL, AF-406-NA, R&D Systems) was dissolved in 1% goat serum PBS-T and incubated overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Images were acquired with an Axioskop II microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using a digital camera (AxioCam Color, Zeiss).
The quantification of IL6 signal was carried after acquiring the images with an Axioskop II microscope (Zeiss) using a digital camera (AxioCam Color, Zeiss) on the entire aorta cross section with the Axiovision Software Rel 4.7 (Zeiss). The percentage of positive area was defined as the ratio between IL6 positive area to the total area of the aortas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Wound Healing Assay for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wound healing assay was used to evaluate cell migration. Cells were plated on 35 mm2 ∅ dishes and pre-treated with 10 μM BK for 24 h. Then cells were treated with 10 μM ICH3 for 48 h. When required, α-Bungarotoxin (αBTX, Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) was supplied 2 h before ICH3. After 24 h of ICH3 treatment, the scratch was made with the p200 tip. The cells were photographed immediately after the scratch (T0) and after 6 h (T6) by an Axioskop 2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The space between the two fronts at T0 and after 6 h was then measured using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The two values were subtracted (T0–T6), obtaining the covered space by the cells in the experimental time chosen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Imaging of DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
U2OS cells were transfected with the appropriate siRNA. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with CPT 1 μM for 1–2 h before being fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min and incubated with the appropriate antibody. Fluorescence microscopy was conducted with a Zeiss Axioskop 2 microscope; excitation wavelengths of 543 nm (rhodamine red) and 488 nm (GFP) were used. The acquired images were processed with Adobe Photoshop. For RPA immunofluorescence, permeabilization was performed prior to fixation in pre-extraction buffer (10 mM PIPES pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton-X100) for 10 min at room temperature. Samples were then blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin and immunostained with the appropriate primary and secondary antibodies. Secondary antibodies coupled to AlexaFluor 488 and 594 were purchased from Molecular Probes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying GABA Receptor Subunits in Fmr1 Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The intensity of immunolabeling was analyzed with an Axioskop 2 microscope equipped with an AxioCam digital camera system and AxioVision 4.6 software (Zeiss). To evaluate possible differences in density of GABAAR subunit labeling in the Fmr1 WT and KO mice, sections from each animal at comparable levels of the hippocampus were processed in the same experimental run with identical conditions for each subunit. Linear black and white digital images of immunolabeling in the dentate molecular layer, from each side of the brain, were obtained under identical conditions on the same day with stabilized light levels for densitometric analysis (n=2–5 animals per group at each age; 4–6 samples per animal for each subunit). The entire molecular layer of the dentate gyrus was outlined in each image, and the densities of labeling (grey values) within this region were determined with morphometric AxioVision software. Data were analyzed with a nonparametric Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Neuropeptide Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism program (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). For the orofacial formalin test, the time spent (in seconds) in face rubbing was counted separately for Phase I and for Phase II. For mRNA expression, results were analyzed using the ΔCt method to compare expression of genes of interest with that of GAPDH. The area covered by CGRP and SP immunoreactive fibres in the TNC ipsilateral to the formalin injection, was expressed as optical density (OD) values, as suggested by previous reports [21 , 27 (link)]. OD was obtained using an AxioSkop 2 microscope (Zeiss) and a computerized image analysis system (AxioCam, Zeiss), equipped with dedicated software (AxioVision Rel 4.2, Zeiss, Germany). The mean OD was determined by rounding off the stained structure of interest (TNC) and subtracting the OD of the background (slide, mounting medium and coverslip) for each section, considering a total of 12 sections per animal. All sections were averaged and reported as the mean ± SEM of OD values.
All data were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) normality test and considered normal. Differences between groups were analyzed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison Test. A probability level of less than 5% was regarded as significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chromatin-bound Protein Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown on culture slides. To remove soluble proteins and fix chromatin-bound proteins, cells were pre-extracted in buffer1 (1 % Triton X-100, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 10 mM NaCl and 3 mM MgCl2) supplemented with halt EDTA free protease and phosphatase inhibitors for 5 min at 4 °C. Cells were then fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 4 °C and then treated in buffer 2 (0.5 % Triton X-100, 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2 and 300 mM sucrose) supplemented with halt EDTA free protease and phosphatase inhibitors for 5 min at 4 °C. Cells were then blocked for 1 h in SuperBlock solution.
To look at Rad9 cellular localization cells were fixed with methanol and then rehydrated with PBS and blocked for 1 h in SuperBlock solution. Staining with primary antibody was performed overnight at 4 °C in blocking solution, whereas species specific fluorescein/Texas red conjugated secondary antibody (Vector Labs) was applied for 1 h at RT, followed by counterstaining with DAPI. All the primary antibodies were used at a 1:250 dilution, whereas the secondary antibodies were employed at a 1:500 dilution. Fluorescence images were captured using a Zeiss Axioskop 2 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Succinic Dehydrogenase Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transverse EDL muscle sections were incubated for 3 min at room temperature in a sodium phosphate buffer containing 75 mM sodium succinate (Sigma), 1.1 mM Nitroblue Tetrazolium (Sigma) and 1.03 mM Phenazine Methosulphate (Sigma). Samples were then fixed in 10% formal-calcium and cleared in xylene prior to mounting with DPX mounting medium (Fisher). Densitometry of the samples was performed on a Zeiss Axioskop2 microscope mounted with an Axiocam HRc camera. Axiovision Rel. 4.8 software was used to capture the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Actin Dynamics in Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SCs were plated on coverslips arranged in 24-well plates at the density of 2 × 104 cells. Cells were pre-treated with 10 μM BK for 24 h. Then cells were treated with 10 μM ICH3 for 48 h. In the experiments with αBTX, this antagonist was supplied 2 h before ICH3. At the end of treatments, cells were washed 3 times with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at RT. After 3 washes in PBS, cells were incubated with Phalloidin conjugated with Alexa Fluor™ 594 (Immunological Sciences, Milan, Italy) for 20 min to reveal actin filaments. After 3 washes in PBS, cells were incubated with Hoechst 33342 (1:1000 in PBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 10 min at RT, for the nuclei counterstaining. At the end, coverslips were fixed on microscope slides with a PBS-glycerol (3:1; v/v) solution. The images were acquired using an Axioskop 2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Morphometric Analysis of Adipocytes in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphometric and immunohistochemical analyses were performed in the four WAT depots from 14-month-old rats. Fragments of tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M phosphate buffer pH 7.3 overnight at 4°C, and then washed in the same buffer. For paraffin embedding, samples were dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin blocks at 60°C.
For immunohistochemistry analysis, 5 μm sections were immunostained by means of the avidin-biotin technique using a commercial anti-MAC2 antibody (1:350 in PBS, Cederlane, Hornby, Ontario, Canada), counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted in Eukitt (Kindler, Freiburg, Germany). Images were acquired with a Zeiss Axioskop 2 microscope equipped with AxioCam ICc3 digital camera and AxioVision 40V 4.6.3.0 Software (Carl Zeiss, S.A., Barcelona, Spain). The software was also used to measure the diameter of 100 adipocytes (from one random field) in two non-consecutive hematoxylin/eosin stained sections. Image analysis from all groups was examined in a blind fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optic Nerve Head Histomorphometric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse eyes were marked with a tissue dye and fixed in Alcoholic Z-fix (provided by Excalibur Pathology, Inc., Norman, OK, USA), and 5-μm hematoxylin and eosin–stained paraffin sections were prepared by Excalibur. The sections most centrally located within the optic nerve head (ONH) were imaged with an Axioskop2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and recorded with a digital camera (ORCA100; Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu City, Japan) that was controlled by a MetaMorph image-processing program (Universal Imaging Co., Downingtown, PA, USA). Images were compiled in Photoshop CS4 and the levels command was used to adjust the contrast of all images simultaneously. ONL width was measured at 200-μm intervals and plotted as distance (mm) superior and inferior to the ONH in the vertical plane. ONL area was calculated by summing ONL thickness in superior and inferior hemiretina (ONH to 2.0 mm) and multiplying by the measurement interval of 0.2 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!