The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Von frey filament

Manufactured by Bioseb
Sourced in France, United States

Von Frey filaments are a set of calibrated nylon filaments used to assess mechanical sensitivity. Each filament applies a specific reproducible force when pressed against the skin. They are a standardized tool for quantifying mechanical sensory thresholds.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

36 protocols using von frey filament

1

Neuropathic Pain Assessment in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were placed on a metal mesh floor for the paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) test. Rat plantar surfaces were applied force using the von Frey filament (Bioseb, Pinellas Park, Fl, USA) 25 min later. Hind paw withdrawal indicated a positive response. The von Frey filament application lasted for 5 s, with a spacing interval of less than 15 s. In the paw withdrawal latency (PWL) test, which aimed to assess the period from stimulus to paw withdrawal, rats were placed separately on a glass plate with a heat stimulator (Bioseb) underneath to stimulate the rat plantar surfaces at most for 18 s. The PWT and PWL tests were both performed at days 3, 7, 14 and 21 after CCI operation. The naive baseline was measured on the previous day of the CCI operation.18 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Somatosensation Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Behavioural assays were used to assess three modalities of somatosensation: sensitivity to mechanical (or tactile), heat and cold stimuli. As a measure of mechanical sensitization, 50% paw withdrawal thresholds were obtained by application of a series of calibrated von Frey filaments (0.38–37 mN; Bioseb, Pinellas Park, FL) to the plantar hind paw, determined using the Up-Down method (Chaplan et al, 1994 (link); Dixon, 1980 ). Heat sensitivity was measured as the latency to paw withdrawal from a focal radiant heat source applied to the plantar hindpaw (Hargreaves et al, 1988 (link)). In both assays, data were collected from both hind paws and averaged per mouse. Cold sensitivity was determined using a thermal preference assay (Zappia et al, 2014 (link)). Briefly, mice were allowed to freely explore a testing chamber (TECA Corp, Chicago, IL) in which the floor was divided into a warm side (30°C) and a second test plate (either 20°C or 23°C, as described); the percentage of time spent on the cold test plate was measured. The experimenter was blinded to genotype for all assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Tactile Sensitivity in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The von-Frey filament up-down method30 (link) was used to evaluate the tactile sensitivity following to the NTG injection. Briefly, mice were placed in an 8 cm × 10 cm × 15 cm Plexiglas box and the hind paw plantar surface was gently probed with a series of eight von Frey filaments with logarithmically incremental stiffness (0.008, 0.04, 0.07, 0.16, 0.40, 0.60, 1.00 and 2.00 g, purchased from Bioseb, Vitrolles, France). Stimuli were presented by probing at intervals of 5–10 seconds and sharp withdrawal or flinching of probed hind paw was considered as a positive response. The threshold of the response (50% tactile threshold) was calculated by using the up-down Excel program based on the equation formula described previously30 (link), which was generously provided by Allan Basbaum’s laboratory (UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA). Mice were habituated to their new experimental environment and handled for 3-days before starting the experiments. Baseline pain threshold was measured immediately before the surgery. Pain measurement was performed on 3, 7, 10 and 14 days after the surgery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mechanical Pain Sensitivity Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On day 8 (study 4), the mechanical pain sensitivity of the abdominal and plantar region was evaluated with von Frey filaments (Bioseb, Vitrolles, France) by a modification of the method of Laird et al. (2001 (link)). The mice were habituated in small compartments on a perforated grid (Dynamic Plantar Aesthesiometer, Ugo Basile, Comerio, Italy) for 1 h before the test. Subsequently von Frey filaments were applied to the abdomen (between diaphragm and genitals) and the plantar side of the right and the left hind paw. The test was performed by a trained blinded observer. The individual filaments were tested in an ascending order covering 0.008, 0.02, 0.04, 0.07, 0.16, 0.4, and 0.6 g forces. Each force was applied 10 times to the abdominal surface, and 5 times to the right and the left hind paw. The maximal duration of each force application was 2 s, and the inter-stimulus interval was 2–3 min. Following each challenge, the withdrawal response was quantified either as 1 (withdrawal of abdominal wall or paw, licking or retraction of animal) or 0 (no response). All counts in response to an individual filament were averaged. Withdrawal responses to low forces reflect high mechanical pain sensitivity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mechanical Allodynia Assessment in Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the mechanical allodynia in the ipsilateral paw, we used a set of eight calibrated von Frey filaments (BioSeb, Vitrolles, France) as previously described (Blom et al., 2020 (link)). Animals were individually placed in small Plexiglas cubicles on a metal grid surface and allowed to acclimatize. The filaments were applied perpendicular to the plantar surface of the ipsilateral paw until the fibers bowed and were held for 2 s. The up-down staircase method was used to determine the threshold force necessary for eliciting withdrawal (Dixon, 1991 (link)). The grams of force that evoked a positive response more than 50% of the time was determined as described by Chaplan et al. (1994) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Assessing Tactile Allodynia in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tactile allodynia was assessed using von Frey filaments (Bioseb, France). Mice were placed in a plastic cage with a wire mesh floor which allowed access to the paws. The plastic cage was covered with an opacity cup to avoid visual stimulation. The area tested was the mid-plantar left hind paw. Mechanical threshold was tested using a modification of the simplified up-down method (Bonin et al., 2014 (link)). A test round started with filament #6 (0.40 g) and progressed to higher or lower filament value depending on the animal’s response. Each animal went through three test rounds for each paw at each experimental condition. Mechanical threshold is expressed as percentage according to baseline (%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Von Frey Mechanical Allodynia Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mechanical allodynia was determined using the von Frey filament test. Each rat was placed in a plastic compartment and behavioral settlement was permitted for at least 25 min; until cage adaptation and major grooming activities stopped. The plastic cages possess wire mesh bottom allowing for sufficient access to the rats’ paws. To evaluate the withdrawal threshold, the “up-down” approach was used by applying the von Frey filaments (2–15 g, with logarithmically incremental stiffness; Bioseb, Vitrolles, France) to the mid-plantar surface of each rat’s left hindpaw. The von Frey hair was held for about 6–8 s perpendicularly to the plantar surface of the left hind paw [24 (link),25 (link)]. Data were presented in grams as paw withdrawal thresholds (PWT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mechanical Allodynia Measurement in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were placed in plastic chambers on a wire mesh grid and stimulated with von Frey filaments (Bioseb) using the up-down method19 (link) starting with 1 g and ending with 2.0 g filament as cutoff value. Baseline measures of untreated or DT-treated WT or GINIP-DTR mice were performed on separate lots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Mechanical Sensitivity Using von Frey Filaments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The von Frey filament test was used to measure sensitivity to a punctuate pressure stimulus. Rats were placed in a plastic cage with a wire mesh bottom which allowed full access to the paws. Behavioral accommodation was allowed for at least 25min until cage exploration, and major grooming activities ceased. Subsequently, von Frey filaments (2-15g, with logarithmically incremental stiffness; Bioseb, Vitrolles, France) were applied to the mid-plantar aspect of the left hind paw using the “up-down” method to determine the withdrawal threshold; the von Frey hair was presented perpendicular to the plantar surface and held for approximately 6-8sec [23 (link), 24 ]. Data are expressed as means ± SEM of paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) in grams.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Von Frey Mechanical Threshold Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hind paw mechanical threshold was assessed using von Frey filaments (Bioseb, France) as described20 (link). For facial testing, mice were subjected to a von Frey stimulus applied to the forehead surface, repeated three times (at minimum 30 s interval). The head withdrawal tactile sensory threshold was the lowest force to elicit withdrawal in 2 of 3 trials. Data points were normalized to the control sensory threshold values determined just before minipump implantation (i.e. at day 0) or before SNP injection (i.e. at day 21, H0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!