The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

318 protocols using maldi tof

1

Bacterial Identification Using MALDI-TOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Direct identification of bacterial colonies was performed with a matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight analyzer (MALDI-TOF, Bruker, Mannheim, Germany). For MALDI-TOF identification, the bacterial colonies were spotted on a MALDI-TOF plate and 1 µL of Bruker HCCA matrix solution (For 250 mL: 2.5 ± 0.3 mg α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, 125 mL acetonitrile, 118.75 mL water, and 6.25 mL trifluoroacetic acid) was added. In case of no identification with MALDI-TOF, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed by GATC (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cost Scenarios for Blood Culture Automation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We generated a total of 12 cost scenarios, comprised of two levels of specimen throughput (reflecting a low capacity laboratory with a throughput of 10,000 specimens per year, and a medium/high capacity with a throughput of 100,000 specimens per year); three levels of automation, with the relevant equipment sourced from two instrument manufacturers: i) automated blood culture system (BACTEC or BacT/ALERT) with manual identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), ii) automated blood culture and AST (BACTEC + Phoenix or BacT/ALERT + Vitek AST), and iii) automated blood culture, ID and AST (BACTEC + Bruker MALDI-TOF + Phoenix, or BacT/ALERT + Vitek MS MALDI-TOF + Vitek AST). Instruments were grouped by manufacturer to reflect likely cost savings when purchased together (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA; Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany and bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), acknowledging, however, that in reality a combination of the different company products is often found in laboratories.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cost Scenarios for Automated Microbiology Workflows

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We generated a total of 12 cost scenarios, comprised of two levels of specimen throughput (reflecting a low capacity laboratory with a throughput of 10,000 specimens per year, and a medium/high capacity with a throughput of 100,000 specimens per year); three levels of automation, with the relevant equipment sourced from two instrument manufacturers: i) automated blood culture system (BACTEC or BacT/ALERT) with manual identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), ii) automated blood culture and AST (BACTEC + Phoenix or BacT/ALERT + Vitek AST), and iii) automated blood culture, ID and AST (BACTEC + Bruker MALDI-TOF + Phoenix, or BacT/ALERT + Vitek MS MAL-DI-TOF + Vitek AST). Instruments were grouped by manufacturer to reflect likely cost savings when purchased together (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA; Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany and bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France), acknowledging, however, that in reality a combination of the different company products is often found in laboratories.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation of C. difficile from Inpatients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Only one sample from each inpatient in seven tertiary hospitals in Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China, was collected between June 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020. During the cultivation process, anaerobic isolation of C. difficile was performed using the selective medium cycloserine–cefoxitin–taurocholate agar (CCFA-TA; Oxoid, UK), and the plates were incubated under anaerobic conditions for 48 h at 37°C. The suspected C. difficile colonies were identified using Brooke matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry ([MALDI-TOF] Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Identification of Achromobacter spp. Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microbiological specimens were cultured according to the standard of care, e.g., Gram-stain and microscopy. Culture was performed on selective and diagnostic agar including antibiotic susceptibility testing. Before 2011 the isolate of Achromobacter spp. was identified using analytical profile index with 20 miniature biochemical tests for identification of Gram-negative non-Enterobacteriaceae (API 20NE) (bioMérieux,Marcy-l’SEtoile, France). After 2011 a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) technique was used for identification [20 (link)]. Since 2020 Whole genome sequencing (WGS) for typing and identification has been done on all first Achromobacter spp. since MALDI-TOF typing is not accurate for Achromobacter spp. level typing [8 (link),20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanoparticle Characterization via Multimodal Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to observe the morphology, elemental mapping and element distribution of nanoparticles. The hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potential were measured on Malvern Zetasizer (Nano ZS-90, Malvern, UK). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was utilized to determine the surface chemistry of HMnO2 and HMP. The UV-Vis absorbance was measured via a spectrophotometer (UH5700, HITACHI, Japan). Mass spectra was recorded by MALDI-TOF (UltrafeXtreme, Bruker, Germany). The amount of TMZ and Mn was investigated using a microplate reader (Multiskan Sky, Thermo, USA) at 328 nm and inductively coupled plasma (ICP), respectively, while the drug loading (DL) and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of TMZ were calculated using the following formulas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phenotypic Characterization of EPE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, the sample material was plated on URI-Select agar plates with vancomycin (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and on ChromID ESBL chromogenic agar plates (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) and incubated at 37°C overnight. Two antimicrobial susceptibility discs containing ceftazidime (10 μg/ml; Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and meropenem (10 μg/ml; Oxoid) were added to the URI-Select agar plates. Colonies of presumptive EPE were subcultivated on horse blood agar (HBA) or URI-Select agar and typed to bacterial species using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).
The phenotype of EPE was characterized by susceptibility to cloxacillin (AmpC) or clavulanic acid (ESBL) using the MAST test (Mast Group Ltd., Liverpool, England). All EPE strains were tested for susceptibility against the following antimicrobial agents: piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftazidime, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, and temocillin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of S. aureus Skin Colonization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After performing the three methods, all collected liquid samples were immediately processed (but not later than 4 h after collecting) at the microbiology laboratory. To detect the bacterial load (colony-forming units (CFU)/ml) at each method, a serial dilution method was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (appendix 27). After incubation at 37 °C over 24 h, the S. aureus–specific colonies were counted. S. aureus–specific colonies were defined according to the manufacturer’s instructions at mannitol salt agar (MSA; Becton Dickinson GmbH, Germany) as medium-sized yellow colonies with yellow surrounding medium and at S. aureus chromID (SAID; bioMérieux, France) green colonies. MSA were used for samples from all patients (n = 30) and SAID selection agar for samples from the 10th patient on continually (n = 21). The amount of bacterial load was indicated in CFU per cm2 of the investigated AD skin area. All S. aureus strains were routinely confirmed on species level by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Molecular Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seventy-four non-repetitive isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex identified using traditional phenotypic methods, API 20-NE (bioMérieux, France), and MALDI-TOF (Bruker-Daltonics, Germany) at TUH. The Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines were used for the antimicrobial susceptibility by single-disc diffusion method, and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) was determined for imipenem and meropenem by broth dilution methods [21 ]. Escherichia coli NCTC 10418, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCTC 10662 represented the quality control strains used in the present study. To confirm the A. baumannii species identity, the gyrB multiplex method was used in addition to the amplification and sequencing of the blaOXA-51-like gene [22 (link),23 (link)]. Only isolates confirmed as A. baumannii were included for further analysis (n=54).
All carbapenem resistant isolates were screened for the presence of the acquired blaOXA-23, -58, -40, -143 and -235 carbapenemase genes by PCR as previously described [24 (link)], and blaNDM, -VIM, and –IMP by PCR and sequencing [17 (link),25 (link)]. The presence of Insertion Elements (ISAba1and ISAba125 upstream of blaOXA-23 and blaNDM, respectively was also done by PCR. All primer sequences and combinations are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ertapenem-Resistant Bacterial Genomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Only isolates resistant to ertapenem (via MIC determination and via the carbapenemase-production test, MHT), were identified to the species level using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS). WGS was performed by MicrobesNG Service (https://microbesng.com/) using the Illumina Miseq short-read technology (2 x 250 paired-end). The assembled and annotated draft genome provided by MicrobesNG Service was further analysed using free online bioinformatic tools at the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) (https://www.genomicepidemiology.org/). This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JAULJM000000000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!