The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 20 statistical package

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 20 is a comprehensive statistical package developed by IBM. It provides a wide range of analytical tools for data management, statistical analysis, and visualization. The core function of SPSS 20 is to enable users to analyze and interpret data, identify patterns, and make informed decisions based on statistical evidence.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

37 protocols using spss 20 statistical package

1

Analyzing Survival Outcomes with Statistical Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) or medians ± interquartile ranges (IQR). Differences in means were assessed for statistical significance by means of Student T-test. Survival analyses were conducted using Kaplan–Meier statistics and Log-rank tests. For all analyses, p value < 0.05 (two-tailed) was taken to be significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS statistical package 20.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Analysis of Tumor Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS statistical package 20.0 (IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL, USA) software. A descriptive statistic was used to analyze the location specific distribution of driver mutations. For analysis of association between the amount of mutant alleles in primary and metastatic samples, paired t-probe (BRAF mutant samples) and nonparametric Wilcoxon sign rank test (NRAS mutant samples, because of the low case numbers) were performed as in case of the different locations of the metastases. Khi square and Fisher’s exact test were used for the analyze of correlation between three MAF categories (low, medium and high), based on MAF in primary and metastatic BRAF/NRAS mutant samples, and for the evaluation of the changes of MAF during tumor progression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Predictors of LDRT Outcome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data on treatment and patient characteristics were retrospectively collected in an electronic database. SPSS statistical package 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the statistical evaluation. Descriptive statistics were calculated for continuous and categorical variables, and were presented as mean for continuous variables and frequencies for categorical variables. Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables was used to test for between-group differences. All p-values were derived from two-sided statistical tests, and p < 0.05 was considered statistical significance. Multivariate logistic regression models were created to determine the predictors of LDRT outcome. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate the potential predictors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Continuous and Categorical Variables

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables, presented as means (± standard deviations), were tested with the Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Categorical variables are presented as number (percentage) and compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Normal distribution was assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test. A bivariate Pearson correlation coefficient was computed to assess the relationship between continues variables. All analyses were considered significant using 2-tailed test with a p-value of < 0.05. The SPSS statistical package 20 was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Entire data were subjected to suitable standard statistical technique. Univariate analysis was done applying Chi-square test, t-test. The analyses were performed using SPSS statistical package 20 (SPSS Inc., IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were stored and analyzed using the SPSS Statistical Package 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Descriptive statistics were computed for continuous and categorical variables. The statistics computed included median and interquartile range of continuous variables and frequencies and relative frequencies of categorical factors. Testing for differences of continuous variables between the study groups was accomplished by the 2-sample t-test for independent samples (parametric test, normally distributed data) or the Mann-Whitney U test (nonparametric test), as appropriate. Test selection was based on evaluating the variables for normal distribution employing the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Comparisons between the study groups for categorical variables were done using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.
To show whether and how strongly pairs of variables are related correlations were assessed using Spearman's rho correlation coefficient.
All P values resulted from two-sided statistical tests and values of P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of Clinical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were stored and analysed using the SPSS statistical package 20.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were computed for continuous and categorical variables. The statistics computed included mean and standard deviations (SD) of continuous variables and are presented as mean ± SD, frequencies and percentages of categorical factors.
The variables analysed were age, sex, complaints at presentation, symptoms, diagnoses, specialized examinations, laboratory examinations and proposed treatment. Confidence intervals of 95% (95%-CI) for important parameters are reported to show the reliability of the point estimates. A major factor determining the length of a confidence interval is the size of the used sample. The worst case would be a point estimate of 50%. In this case, we wanted to achieve an interval length of about 8–10 percent. It was possible with 500 people taking part in the survey. The sample size was determined by using the study planning software “nQuery Advisor® 7.0” (nQuery (2017)) (Statistical solutions, Saugus, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Results

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results were represented as mean±SD. Significance was assessed by One Way ANOVA following appropriate transformation to normalize and equalize variance when necessary. Mean values were compared by subsequent student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) using the SPSS statistical package 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A difference at P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Analysis of Cellular Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results were represented as mean ±standard deviation (SD). Significance was assessed by One Way ANOVA following variance normalization and equalization where necessary. Mean values were compared by subsequent student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) using the SPSS statistical package 20.0 (SPSS, USA). A difference at p <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Predicting Mortality Risk with Tissue Factor and Microvesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were stored and analyzed using the SPSS statistical package 20.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA). Descriptive statistics were computed for continuous and categorical variables. The computed statistics included mean and standard deviations or median and interquartile range of continuous variables, frequencies, and relative frequencies of categorical factors. Testing for the differences of continuous variables between the study groups was accomplished by the two-sample t test for independent samples or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Test selection was based on evaluating the variables for normal distribution employing the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
The logistic regression model was used to assess whether TF or MVs can predict risk of mortality, high SAPS II, and SOFA score. According to their average content of PS and TF, patients were divided into three groups and odds ratios as well as 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated for the outcome of survival, high SAPS II, and SOFA score while one of the groups was used as a reference group. All values resulted from two-sided statistical tests, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered to be significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!