The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss v 21 for windows

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS v.21 for Windows is a statistical software package designed to analyze data and manage information. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and visualization. SPSS v.21 is compatible with the Windows operating system.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

90 protocols using spss v 21 for windows

1

HPgV-1 Persistence in HIV-1 Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, and laboratorial variables were analyzed in the statistical software SPSS for Windows v. 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The population studied, the positivity for HPgV-1 in ART-naïve samples, the minimum time of HPgV-1 persistence, and the virus circulating genotypes were described using proportions and means. The prevalence of the HPgV-1 and subtypes 2a and 2b in the ART-naïve subjects were compared in relation to the HIV-1 VL and CD4+ T-cell counts with the Mann-Whitney U-Test. The low frequency of HPgV-1 genotypes 1 and 3 prevented their inclusion in the statistical analyses. In order to analyze the influence of HPgV-1 persistence time on the evolution of HIV-1 infection, three categories were created: 0 to 4 years (n = 42), 5 to 8 years (n = 36), and 9 or more years (n = 31). In this case, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey test were used. p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Prognostic Predictors in Watch-and-Wait Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TTFT was calculated during the watch and wait period from the date of the diagnosis to the date of therapy start or last follow-up. The prognostic impact of predictors was investigated by univariable and multiple Cox regression analysis. Data were expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The predictive accuracy of the prognostic models was quantified by calculating Harrell’s c-index (HC-index), ranging from 0.5 to 1.0, and the explained variation on the outcome (i.e., an index combining calibration and discrimination) (45 (link)). The improvement of model fitting due to the inclusion of specific genes was assessed by the log-likelihood ratio statistics. The receiver operator curves (ROC) Figure 2B illustrate the model performance by plotting the actual positive rate (sensitivity) versus the false positive rate (1 - specificity). A value of P <.05 was considered significant for all statistical calculations. Data analysis was performed by SPSS for Windows v.21, IBM, Chicago, Illinois, USA, and by Stata 16, StataCorp, Texas, USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Factors Influencing Self-Rated Health in Students

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample data were entered and analysed using SPSS for Windows, V.21 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, USA). The χ2 tests were applied to assess any associations between our independent variables and SRH at a 5% level of significance. All significant variables in the bivariate analysis were then entered into a logistic regression analysis. Three-graded models were prepared to examine the effects of the independent variables on SRH. Model 1 included demographic and family factors, model 2 included model 1 and lifestyle factors, and model 3 comprised model 2 and psychological factors. Adjusted ORs (AORs) with 95% CIs were computed to determine the effect sizes of the independent variables. Since it was a self-administered questionnaire survey, several variables had missing values; analysis was performed ignoring the missing data. A Hosmer-Lemeshow test was applied to determine each model's goodness-of-fit.
Prior consent was obtained from each school administration and parents or guardians. Informed consent was obtained from individual participants after they were fully informed about the study objectives and procedures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Antimicrobial and Anticancer Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data shown in figures were entered into Microsoft ® Excel for Mac Version 16.44 (Microsoft Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA), where mean and Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) are shown for most graphic depictions. For gibberellic acid germination experiments, mean germination rate per pod (with ten pods per group) is displayed with SEM, and a two-tailed T-test was used with significance set at P ≤ 0.05. For the antimicrobial disc diffusion assay, mean zones of inhibition in millimeters for five biological replicates are presented with associated SEM. For T84 and RKO human colon cancer toxicity experiments, mean percentage of viable cells normalized to the control (solvent alone) for three biological replicates is shown with associated SEM. Real-time PCR results are displayed as mean transcript level of three biological replicates shown with associated SEM and normalized to Actin mRNA levels. Statistical significance among transcript means was determined through a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS for Windows, v.21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), where differences were considered statistically significant with a value of P ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Personality Traits and Schizotypy in Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of the results was performed on Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) for windows v.21 (IBM Corp. Armonk, NY). Differences between groups in terms of gender were tested using chi-square test and a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to calculate the effect of group on BFI domains, further one-way ANOVAs indicated the sources of significant group main effects. One-way ANOVA was conducted to examine group main effects on SPQ-B overall and sub-scale scores; Student’s t-tests followed by Bonferroni post hoc corrections were used for group comparisons. In additional analyses, anxiety rates and depression were added as covariate factors to the initial models in order to explore the possibility of confounding variables. Finally, hierarchal regression models were computed separately for each group in order to explore relationships between SPQ-B and BFI factors, depression and anxiety.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of Heart Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are expressed as mean AE standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows v21 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Comparisons between 2 parameters were analyzed with the unpaired Student t test. Comparisons of parameters among the 3 groups were made by one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey test. A value of P <.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histological Analysis of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All variables were presented using mean values and standard deviation (SD). ANOVA with a Bonferroni post hoc test and the Kruskall-Wallis tests were used to compare the mean values of continuous variables across the histologic groups. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows, v.21.0 (IBM Corporation). All graphs was expressed just descriptive analysis data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Survey Response Rates Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The survey response rates were assessed as view rate, participation rate, and completion rate following recommendations given by the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) for the whole study cohort.5 Proportions were used to describe categorical data. Statistical tests were not employed since no statistical analysis could be made as no comparison between groups was made in the study. The analysis was done using IBM SPSS for Windows, v. 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Ectopic Pregnancy Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows V.21.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY). Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine if continuous variables were normally distributed. Descriptive statistics were reported according to data distribution as mean ± standard deviation (SD), or median and range for continuous variables; the nominal variables were reported as absolute number and percentage (%). Normally distributed variables were compared between the three groups using the ANOVA test and post-hoc analysis as appropriate. Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks was used to compare nonparametric continuous and ordinal variables with post-hoc analysis if required. Qualitative data were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test when the expected frequency was less than five. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, after adaptation in case of multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni method. To evaluate whether the βhCG and the EP mass diameter were possible confounders regarding the fertility outcomes, we repeated the analysis between the three groups strafing the study population based on the βhCG cut-off value of 1745 mIU/mL, previously reported associated to tubal patency [20 (link)], and based on the EP mass diameter of 25 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using IBM SPSS for Windows v. 21.0 (IBM, New York, NY, USA), Cronbach’s alpha reliability analysis, t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson’s correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analysis were conducted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!