The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using anti gfp antibody

1

Monoclonal Antibodies for HCMV Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against viral proteins utilized in this project included antibodies to pp150 (36-14), pp28 (41-18), pp65 (28-19), IE1 (p63-27), gB (27-156), gM (IMP), UL85 (pUL85), UL44 (28-21), and gH (AP86). The commercially available antibodies used in these studies were anti-Grasp65 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA), anti-GM130 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA), anti-GM130 MAb (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-golgin-245 MAb (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-actin MAb (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA), anti-GFP antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and anti-HCMV UL57 antibody (Virusys, Taneytown, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Plasmid-Based Fluorescent Reporter Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise specified, all reagents and chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The shuttle plasmid pGFP::SW2 was kindly provided by Ian N. Clarke, University of Southampton Medical School. The pRSETB-roGFP2 plasmid containing roGFP2 was purchased from the University of Oregon. The anti-GFP antibody was obtained from BD Biosciences. The anti-MOMP antibody was a stock from our laboratory and produced from a mouse. All of the enzymes used in the study were obtained from New England Biolabs. XL10-Gold ultracompetent cells were obtained from Agilent Technologies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Signaling Pathway Reagents and Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SDF-1α and CSF-1 were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) and Pepro Tech (Rocky Hill, NJ), respectively. Gö 6976, Gö 6983, and U73122 were purchased from Calbiochem (Billerica, MA). CID755673 was purchased from Tocris (United Kingdom). fMLP and DMSO were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Antibodies anti–phospho-PKD/PKCmu(S744/748), anti–phospho-PKD1(Ser-916), and anti-PKD/PKCμ were from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA). Anti-SSH2 antibody was from Novus Biologicals. Anti–14‑3‑3 antibody was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-GFP antibody was from BD Bioscience (San Jose, CA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated anti-actin was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX). HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G was obtained from Jackson Immuno­Research (United Kingdom). All tissue culture reagents were purchased from Invitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were resuspended in PBS at an OD600 = 2. Samples were sonicated and centrifuged at maximum speed for 20 min at 4 °C. The soluble, insoluble and total fractions were resolved on 12% w/v SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. Immunodetection was performed using anti-GFP antibody (BD Biosciences) and membranes were developed with ECL Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Densitometry bands analysis was performed using the Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoprecipitation of ENDOA2 and GFP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were prepared in 50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, phosphatase and protease inhibitors, centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 20 min. Protein concentration was quantified using Bradford assay (Pierce). In total, 500 μg of protein from cell lysate were incubated overnight at 4 °C with 10 μg/ml of anti-ENDOA2 (Santa Cruz) or anti-GFP antibodies (BD Pharmingen), and finally incubated with protein A/G magnetic beads (88802, Thermo Scientific) for 2 h at 4 °C. The immunocomplexes were washed three times in lysis buffer and resuspended in 2X Laemmli’s sample buffer. For western-blot analysis, 50 μg of protein was loaded for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Co-Immunoprecipitation of H3 Histamine Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK 293 cells were co-transfected with C-terminal YFP-fused and N-terminal Xpress-tagged H3Rs. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed in buffer containing 50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, and 0.5% Triton X-100 plus protease cocktail inhibitor on ice for 10 min. The lysates were then centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min. The supernatants were incubated with protein A-sepharose (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK) and anti-GFP antibodies (BD Bioscience Clontech, San Jose, CA, USA) overnight at 4 °C. The beads were washed five times with lysis buffer and resuspended in 4-fold concentrated Laemmli buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 40% glycerol, 0.02% bromophenol, βME 0.5 M). Non-specific background was determined by the transfection of N-terminal Xpress-tagged H3Rs without H3R-YFP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!