The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using jem 2100 hrtem

1

Algal Biomass Surface Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the algal biomass surface was examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL JSM-6510 L.V operated at 30 KV) combined with energy-dispersive X-Ray analysis (EDX) (JEOL JEM-2100 (HRTEM), as well as Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific model FT-IR is 10, Waltham, MA, USA). This was performed to better understand the morphology and properties of the algal surface, as well as to investigate the correlation between structural properties of the biosorbent and adsorption behavior.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Material Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction of the samples was carried out using Bruker D8 Advance Twin-Twin equipment using Cu-Kα (1.5404 Å) radiation. Powdered samples were dispersed and pressed on the glass plate before taking XRD of the sample. Transmission electron microscopy images of the samples were taken using JEOL JEM 2100 HRTEM operating at 200 kV. Powdered samples were dispersed in ethanol and sonicated and were taken on a carbon grid before TEM measurements. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed with a Perkin Elmer, Diamond TG/DTA in a nitrogen atmosphere in the temperature range 15–900 °C at 20 °C/min. Vibrating Sample Magnetometer measurements of the powder samples were performed using Quantum Design Dynacool PPMS in the field range ±50 KOe at 300 K. PL studies of the samples were investigated using an inVia Reflex Raman spectrometer attached with a laser of excitation wavelength 405 nm (Renishaw, UK, Model No. M-9836-3991-01-A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) was determined by X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D8 advance) using CuKα radiation ranging from 20°-80°. The size and shape of the IONPs were assessed through scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, HR-TEM) images. The SEM images were recorded using a microscope in JSM-6700F FESEM, JEOL, Japan and TEM images were obtained on a JEM-2100 HRTEM, JEOL, Japan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Particle Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The confirmation of the phase was carried out by evaluating the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns obtained using a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα1 (λ = 1.5406 Å) as the incident radiation. A Jobin Yvon Horiba T64000 Raman spectrometer with an excitation wavelength of 514.5 nm was used for the Raman investigation. A Carl Zeiss SUPRA 40 field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) and a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) were used to examine the morphology of the particles (model: JEM-2100 HRTEM, JEOL). The surface area analysis and porosity of the synthesized powders were determined using a Quantachrome Chem BET analyzer, and the thickness measurement was done through atomic force microscopy (model: Agilent Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

TEM Analysis of Metal Nanostructures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The average particle size, size distribution and morphology of the prepared metal nanostructures were studied using high resolution transmission electron microscope (JEOL, JEM-2100 HRTEM). In order to load the sample into the TEM, a drop of well-dispersed nanoparticle dispersion was applied on an amorphous carbon-coated 200 mesh carbon grid and dried at ambient temperature [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanoparticle Characterization via Ultracentrifugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Filtration was carried out by using a cooling ultracentrifuge model (Hettich MIKRO, German) separation of the nanoparticles was according to their mass where the lower layer contains massive particle. The relative centrifugal force (RCF) was then calculated by applying Eq. (1) 21 (link). RCF=1.118×10-5×r×N2 where RCF is the relative centrifugal force (cm/sec2), r is the rotational radius (cm), and N is the rotating speed (revolution per minute, rpm). Then each sample was characterized by JEOL JEM-2100 HR-TEM, XRD, and Zetasizer (nano 90 Malvern, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Nanomaterial Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For characterization, tools like Shimadzu UV–visible spectrophotometry for measuring the absorption spectrum, Malvern zeta sizer and dynamic light scattering (DLS) for the measurement of surface charge and hydrodynamic diameter, respectively, Bruker Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy for the measurement of characteristic bonds present, and JEOL JEM 2100 HRTEM Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to characterize the surface morphology and size were used. Phytochemical analysis was performed using the standard protocol [40 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Synthesized Copper Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Different analytical techniques were utilized to characterize the synthesized NPs in order to assess their functionality. The functional groups of producing CuONPs were investigated using an FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker Scientific, Billerica, MA, USA). Using an X-ray diffractometer for powder (Bruker Scientific, Billerica, MA, USA), the crystalline structure of the produced CuONP was examined. The particle size of the nanoparticle was determined by zeta potential and a particle analyzer. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HRSEM) and an Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDS) were used to evaluate the elemental composition of CuONPs (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy JEM-2100 (HRTEM) (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used to examine the structural characteristics of NPs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Copper Nanoclusters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Emission
spectral studies were monitored
by a JASCO FP-6600 spectrofluorometer with excitation wavelength at
380 nm in the emission mode. Both the emission and excitation slit
widths were kept at 5 nm. Absorption spectra were recorded from 800
to 200 nm by a JASCO V-630 spectrophotometer with 1.0 cm quartz cells.
Nanostructure and morphology of NCs were verified by JEOL JEM 2100
HR-TEM operating at 200 kV. DLS information was evidenced to determine
the average size (hydrodynamic diameter) of CuNCs. DLS analysis results
were acquired by Malvern Zetasizer Nano. Zeta potential experiments
were recorded by Zetasizer Nano, ZS with 633 nm He–Ne laser,
equipped with a MPT-2 autotitrator (Malvern, UK). Fluorescence lifetime
experiments were performed on Horiba Scientific equipped with an NL-C2
pulsed diode excitation source of 380 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of 0.1% Ag/TiO2-1% rGO Photocatalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase composition of the prepared materials was studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using diffractograms collected by PANalytical X'Pert Pro diffractometer with CuKα source (λ = 1.5406 Å). The morphology of the 0.1% Ag/TiO2-1% rGO photo-composite was investigated by high-resolution TEM model JEM 2100-HRTEM (JEOL, USA, Inc.) operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Raman spectra were acquired using a WITec Alpha 300 RA confocal Raman microscope (WITec GmbH, Ulm, Germany). The ultra violet-visible light (UV–Vis) diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were measured by a spectrometer (JASCO, Model V730, Japan) equipped with diffuse reflectance accessories, using BaSO4 as the reference sample,) and the photoluminescence (PL) was determined by spectrofluorometer (JASCO, Model FP-6500, Japan) at excitation wavelength 315 nm. The light source was a Xenon arc lamp (150 Watt).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!