The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hrrt pet scanner

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in United States

The HRRT (High-Resolution Research Tomograph) PET scanner is a state-of-the-art imaging device manufactured by Siemens. It is designed to provide high-resolution, three-dimensional images of the human body for research purposes. The HRRT PET scanner utilizes advanced detector technology and image reconstruction algorithms to deliver detailed, high-quality images of the brain, organs, and other structures within the body.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using hrrt pet scanner

1

PET Imaging of [11C]AZ10419369 Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The radiochemical production of [11C]AZ10419369 was done as previously reported [26 (link)]. PET scanning was conducted with a high-resolution research tomography (HRRT) PET scanner (CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA) and co-registered to an MRI brain scan. The MRI and PET scanning protocols, processing and quantification of [11C]AZ10419369 binding has previously been detailed [18 (link)]. Non-displaceable binding potentials (BPNDs) were computed by the Extended Simplified Reference Tissue Model [27 (link)], with the cerebellum as a reference. The PET data at baseline (BPND0) and when DBS-STN was turned off (BPND1) have previously been reported [18 (link)] and tested for group differences between patients and healthy controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Presynaptic Density via PET Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants in subcohort II will undergo PET neuroimaging with [11C]-UCB-J, which binds to the presynaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A). SV2A is ubiquitously and homogeneously located in synapses across the brain and allows for the determination of SV2A binding and presynaptic density in the brain [69 (link), 70 (link)]. However, due to the ubiquitous distribution of SV2A, there is no proper reference region in the brain, and we, therefore, measure the arterial input function. PET scanning is conducted using a High-Resolution Research Tomography (HRRT) PET scanner (CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA). First a 6 min transmission scan, then an intravenous bolus of < 400 MBq of [11C]-UCB-J administered over 20 s followed by a 90-min dynamic acquisition (256 × 256 × 207 voxels; 1.22 × 1.22 × 1.22 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vivo PET Imaging of Female Pigs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three female pigs (21, 22 and 23 kg) were used for in vivo PET imaging on a HRRT PET scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). All animal procedures were approved by the Danish Council for Animal Ethics (journal no. 2012-15-2934-00156).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Radiosynthesis and PET Imaging of [11C]UCB-J

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Radiosynthesis of [11C]UCB-J was modified on the basis of Nabulsi et al. [37 (link)], as described in detail in the Supplementary file. All participants were scanned with a high-resolution research tomography (HRRT) PET scanner (CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA). Following a six-min transmission scan, a 120 min PET scan was started at the time of intravenous [11C]UCB-J bolus injection (over ~20 sec). PET data were acquired in 3D list mode and reconstructed into 40 frames (8 × 15 s, 8 × 30 s, 4 × 60 s, 5 × 120 s, 10 × 300 s, 5 × 300 s) using a 3D OP-OSEM algorithm with modelling of the point-spread-function [38 (link), 39 (link)], and attenuation corrected using the HRRT maximum a posteriori transmission reconstruction method (MAP-TR) [40 (link)]. Each image frame consisted of 207 planes of 256 × 256 voxels of 1.22 × 1.22 × 1.22 mm3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PET Imaging Protocols for Neurological Disorders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PET imaging protocols have been described in detail earlier (Majuri, Joutsa, Johansson, Voon, Alakurtti, et al., 2017 (link); Majuri, Joutsa, Johansson, Voon, Parkkola, et al., 2017 (link)). Briefly, PET imaging was performed using a high resolution research tomography (HRRT) PET scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA) with a nearly isotropic intrinsic spatial resolution of 2.5 mm (Jong et al., 2007 (link)). The scanning time was 51 min with 11C-carfentanil, 90 min with 18F-FDOPA and 90 min with 11C-MADAM. 3D mode was used for the camera with scatter correction. PET scanning for all three tracers was performed during a single day at fixed intervals. Three subjects (one GD and two HC) underwent PET scans on two different days due to logistical issues. An individually shaped thermoplastic mask was used to reduce head movements during scanning, and head motion was recorded using a stereotaxic infrared camera (Polaris vicar, Northern Digital, Waterloo, Canada). Three GD patients used a Velcro strap instead of a thermoplastic mask because they felt the mask was uncomfortable.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PET Imaging of Serotonin 5-HT6 Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PET acquisition and quantification has been described in detail elsewhere [28 ]. Briefly, all patients were scanned with a High-resolution Research Tomography (HRRT) PET scanner (CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA) for 120 min after an intravenous 20 s bolus injection of [11C]-SB207145, and a 6 min transmission scan. The PET data was reconstructed into 38 time frames (6 × 5 s, 10 × 15 s, 4 × 30 s, 5 × 2 min, 5 × 5 min, and 8 × 10 min) and motion correction was performed with Air.5.2.5 [39 ], aligning each PET frame to the first 5 min frame (frame 26). All patients were MR-scanned using a Siemens 3-Tesla Prisma scanner, and T1 weighted MRI images were co-registered with the PET images to acquire anatomical information using SPM8. ROIs were automatically extracted using the pvelab software package [40 ] and delineated on each subject’s MRI. Correct co-registration of PET and MR images and ROI placement were visually quality checked in three planes by a trained investigator. Mean time activity curves for hemisphere weighted grey matter volumes were used in the kinetic modelling and the simplified reference tissue model with cerebellum (excluding vermis) as reference region [41 , 42 ] yielded non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) as outcome measure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Neuroimaging of 5-HTT Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Magnetom Trio or Verio MR scanner. All participants were examined using a HRRT PET scanner (Siemens Molecular Imaging, USA), with an approximate in-plane spatial resolution of 2mm [14 ]. A six-minute transmission scan was performed prior to each PET measurement to correct for signal attenuation. The radioligand [11C]DASB, which binds selectively to 5-HTT, was prepared as described earlier [15 ]. In each PET experiment, a saline solution containing [11C]DASB was injected into an antecubital vein as a bolus. The cannula was then flushed with saline. Emission data were acquired continuously for 90 min and subsequently binned into 36 consecutive time frames using the following frame definitions: six 10 s, three 20 s, six 30 s, five 1 min, five 2 min, eight 5 min, and three 10 min frames.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Synthesis and PET Imaging of [11C]SB207145

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synthesis of the radioligand, [11C]SB207145, was performed using an automated radiosynthesis system as previously described (Marner et al., 2009 (link)). An intravenous bolus injection of the radioligand was given over 20 s, followed by 120-minute dynamic data acquisition with a high-resolution research tomography (HRRT) PET scanner (CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA). To minimize head movement, all subjects had their head stabilized in a specialized head holder. The scans were reconstructed into 38 frames (6 × 5, 10 × 15, 4 × 30, 5 × 120, 5 × 300, and 8 × 600 s) using a 3D-OSEM-PSF algorithm (16 subsets, 10 iterations) with TXTV based attenuation correction (image matrix, 256 × 256 × 207; voxel size, 1.22 × 1.22 × 1.22 mm), as previously described (Hong et al., 2007 (link); Keller et al., 2013 (link); Sureau et al., 2008 (link)). T1 and T2 weighted MRI scans used for co-registration were acquired for each subject using a Siemens Prisma 3T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 64-channel head coil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal Neuroimaging: Structural MRI and PET

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects received a 3T structural MRI on a different day from the PET scan days for use in aligning PET data to the template space. Typical acquisition parameters for the structural MRI were 3D MPRAGE MR pulse sequence with TE = 3.3 ms, flip angle = 7°; slice thickness = 1.0 mm, and 0.98 × 0.98 mm2 pixels.
PET scans were acquired for 2 h (40 × 3 min) with B/I (Kbol = 105 min) of tracer in the HRRT PET scanner (Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN). Injected doses and specific activities of 11C‐raclopride were 741 ± 29 MBq and 450 ± 189 MBq/nmol, respectively. The Vicra optical tracking system (Vicra, NDI Systems, Waterloo, Canada) was used to measure and record subject head movement during each scan. List‐mode dynamic data were reconstructed with all corrections (attenuation, normalization, scatter, randoms, dead time, and motion) using the MOLAR algorithm [Carson et al., 2003].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal Neuroimaging of Dopamine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects received a 3T structural MRI on a different day from the PET scan days for use in aligning PET data to the template space. Typical acquisition parameters for the structural MRI were: 3D MPRAGE MR pulse sequence with TE= 3.3 ms, flip angle=7 degrees; slice thickness= 1.0 mm, 0.98 × 0.98 mm pixels.
PET scans were acquired for 2 hours (40 × 3min) with B/I (Kbol = 105 min) of tracer in the HRRT PET scanner (Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN, USA). Injected doses and specific activities of 11C-raclopride were 741 ± 29 MBq and 450 ± 189 MBq/nmol, respectively. The Vicra optical tracking system (Vicra, NDI Systems, Waterloo, Canada) was used to measure and record subject head movement during each scan. List-mode dynamic data were reconstructed with all corrections (attenuation, normalization, scatter, randoms, dead time, and motion) using the MOLAR algorithm (Carson et al., 2003 ).s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!