The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gx51 optical microscope

Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in Japan

The GX51 is an optical microscope designed for routine laboratory use. It features bright-field and dark-field illumination modes, allowing for the observation of a variety of sample types. The microscope is equipped with high-quality optical components to provide clear, high-contrast images.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using gx51 optical microscope

1

Metallographic Microstructure Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metallographic samples were ground and polished using Buehler metallography equipment. Light Optical Microscopy (LOM) was undertaken using an Olympus GX51 optical microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo , Japan) and Stream Essentials (ver. 1.9.1.) on etched samples using Kroll’s Reagent (92 vol % H2O, 6 vol % HNO3 and 2 vol % HF) for 5 to 10 s to reveal the microstructure. For electron microscopy analysis, a Zeiss MERLIN scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) in conjunction with a backscatter detector (BSD) was used.
Individual grain width measurements were done with Stream Essentials software tools. Volumetric α/β phase fractions were assumed to coincide with the area phase fractions of a 2D micrograph. Minimum and maximum grain widths were measured as mean values using the line-intercept method automated in Matlab 2017a through the help of Matlab’s Image Processing Toolbox.
X-ray diffraction was done using a Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer (Cu Kα source) with a standard Bragg Brentano geometry. Accusation dwell time was 0.75 s at steps of 0.01°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Induction Heating Effects on Coated Steel Rods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 400 kW induction heater (Termetal, Graniczna, Poland) was used for the tests, designed for rods of 35–70 mm diameter. In these tests, coatings on steel rods, diameters 35, 45 and 70 mm, were tried. Three protective substances in diverse concentration, diluted with water were tested:

Berulit—concentration; 100%, 66%, 50% and 33%

Bonderite—concentration; 100%, 66% and 50%

Condursal—concentration; 100%

Pieces of metal rods were pre-coated by immersion then dried in a vertical position. After drying out, rods were heated in an induction heater in which they were moving towards the exit, where the temperature measurement was taken. The temperature was 1150–1180 °C which meant that they were fit for forging. Nevertheless, after heating the rods were placed for cooling in the air. Finally, decarburization was analyzed. It showed that among all rod’s diameters, those with the least diameter were decarburized the most, that is, rods of 35 mm diameters. Therefore, based on these rods, the analysis of the coatings and decarburization correlation was carried out. Samples similarly to the bars from previous section were cut perpendicular to the bar axis, the cross section was polished and pre-etched with Nital 3%. The microstructure observations were done on the Olympus GX-51 optical microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Induction Heating Decarburization Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To define heating time corresponding to induction heating, a few trials were carried out. First the numerical modelling of heating process was performed to obtain real temperature of rod inside and on the surface during induction heating. Another test show that within 5 min, in a furnace of 1200 °C decarburization similar to an industrial one takes place. Therefore, steel samples C45 were coated by three different products of various concentrations, and after that, they were heated for 5 min in a furnace without a protective atmosphere in a temperature 1200 °C. They were then cooled in the air, and decarburization of the surface layer was examined. In order to evaluate the effect of the coatings on the decarburization of the surface layer the microstructure analysis was performed. Samples were cut perpendicular to the bar axis, the cross section was polished and pre-etched with Nital 3%. The microstructure observations were done on the Olympus GX-51 optical microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Welded Joint Microstructure and Tensile Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After welding, the samples were cross-sectioned to perform microstructure and microhardness analysis. For this purpose, the samples were embedded in resin and electrolytically etched in 4% oxalic acid under conditions of 6V and 1.5A. An Olympus GX51 optical microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with image analysis software was used for analyses.
HV10 hardness was measured on a WPM Leipzig 300/436 hardness tester (WPM GmbH, Leipzig, Germany); microhardness was measured on a LECO LM 247AT microhardness tester (Leco Corporation, St Joseph, MI, USA) with a load of HV0.1. In each case, 15 punctures were made across the entire welded joint in one line. The distance between the individual indentation was set at 0.5 mm, see Figure 4. Control measurements were also made in HAZ, which were measured above and below the measurement line.
Tensile tests were performed at +20 °C according to standard EN ISO 6892-1 [31 ], using the Zwick Roell Z1200H testing machine (Zwick Roell Group, Ulm, Germany). After fracture, the fracture morphology was observed by the Quanta 450 FEG (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) scanning electron microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!