The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

64 protocols using simca p version 13

1

Discriminating Geographic Origin of Perilla and Sesame Seeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed no fewer than three times. Data obtained from GC-qMS were analyzed using PCA and OPLS-DA (SIMCA-P version 13.0; Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) to discriminate the geographic origin of perilla and sesame seeds. To determine the optimal OPLS-DA model, all the data were normalized with unit variance (UV)-scaling and pareto-scaling. PCA and OPLS–DA were based on the calculated eigenvectors and eigenvalues. The external validation test, permutation test and analysis of variance of the cross-validated residuals (CV-ANOVA) were conducted using SIMCA-P version 13.0 (Umetrics). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and student’s t-test were performed using MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Silylated Component Analysis by GC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification of volatile and non-volatile silylated components was performed by comparing their retention indices (RI) in relation to n-alkanes (C6-C20), mass matching to NIST, WILEY library database and with standards if available. Peaks were first deconvoluted using AMDIS software (www.amdis.net (accessed on 28 November 2019)) [12 ] before mass spectral matching. Peak abundance data were exported for multivariate data analysis by extraction using MET-IDEA software (Broeckling, Reddy, Duran, Zhao, & Sumner, 2006). Data were then normalized to the amount of spiked internal standard (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate and then subjected to principal component analysis (PCA), hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) using SIMCA-P version 13.0 software package (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden). Markers were subsequently identified by analyzing the S-plot, which was declared with covariance (p) and correlation (pcor). All variables were mean-centered and scaled to Pareto variance. Model validation was assessed by computing the diagnostic indices, viz. Q2 and R2 values, and permutation testing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolic Profiling Analysis by PCA and OPLS-DA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The integrated data matrix was imported into the SIMCA-P + (version 13.0) software package (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden), and the principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were used to distinguish the overall difference in metabolic profile among groups. The variable important in projection (VIP) value was calculated and obtained based on OPLS-DA. Metabolites with VIP >1 were further subjected to univariate statistical analysis to measure the significance of each metabolite (seen in Supplementary Table S2).
The data was expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The univariate statistical analysis were performed using IBM SPSS statistics 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States). Firstly, the Levene’s test was used for homogeneity of variances. And then, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett t post hoc test was used for homogeneous variances, while ANOVA with Tamhane post hoc test was used for non-homogeneous variances. p value less than 0.05 or 0.01 was considered statistically significant. The condition of VIP >1 and p < 0.05 was used to screen the differential expressed metabolites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolomics-Based Multivariate Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Visualization of the data and data analysis were carried out with MeV 4.9.0 software (Saeed et al., 2003 (link)). Every experiment was carried out in triplicate. Statistical significance from different treatments was revealed after one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. Partial Least Square (PLS) models were performed using SIMCAP+ version 13.0 (Umetrics AB, Umeå, Sweden) with 14 metabolites as X variables and eight biological activities as Y variables. All variables were mean-centered and unit-variance (UV) scaled prior to PLS. Correlation analysis was performed using Past 3.0 (Øyvind Hammer, Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway) using the Pearson parametric correlation test and visualized using Heatmapper (Babicki et al., 2016 (link)). Significant thresholds at p < 0.05 with significant differences represented by different letters or p < 0.05, <0.01, and <0.001 were used for all statistical tests and represented by different letters or by *, **, and ***, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multivariate Analysis of Quantified Proteins and Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of demographic data, the median value (min-max) was calculated. Wilcoxon paired test was used to compare results before and after the intervention. These statistics were performed using the statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics (version 24.0; IBM Corporation, Route 100 Somers, New York, NY, USA). A probability of <0.05 (two-tailed) was accepted as the criteria for significance. To investigate the multivariate correlation and between membership of groups and quantified proteins and metabolites orthogonal partial least square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was used (SIMCA-P+ version 13.0, UMETRICS, Umeå, Sweden). Before this analysis, principal component analysis (PCA) was used to check for multivariate outliers. The procedure to compute multivariate correlation models has been described earlier [41 (link)] and is in accordance with [42 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multivariate Analysis of Metabolomics Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The resulting data sets were then imported into SIMCA-P version 13.0 (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden) for further multivariate data analyses.
Prior to PCA, the bucket data were mean-centered and then scaled using Pareto scaling. Hotelling’s T2 region, shown as an ellipse in the score plots, defined the 99% confidence interval of the modeled variation. The quality of the model was described by Rx2 and Q2 values. Rx2 was defined as the proportion of variance in the data explained by the model, indicating goodness of fit. Q2 was defined as the proportion of variance in the data that was predictable by the model, indicating predictability.
OPLS-DA provided the maximum covariance between the measured data (X) and the response variable (Y). The response variables represent the intensities of the corresponding buckets assigned to separate components. The overall predictive ability of the model was assessed by cumulative Q2, which represented the fraction of the variation in Y that can be predicted by the model47 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multivariate Analysis of Vaccine-Induced Antibody Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Temporal changes in BPI3V antibody titre were analysed using two-tailed paired T-test, and significant differences between treatment groups at sampling stages was assessed using two-tailed heteroscedastic T-test. SIMCA-P+ version 13.0 (Umetrics, Sweden) was used for multivariate metabolite marker selection. For SIMCA-P+ analysis, data was prefiltered to exclude AMRTPs with coefficient of variation greater than 50% in replicate quality control pools. All centroid data were Pareto scaled and analysed by unsupervised Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and supervised discriminatory analysis by Orthogonal Projections of Latent Structures-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA). Unsupervised PCA models were generated at each sampling day to reveal potential relationships between treatment groups. Supervised analysis by OPLS-DA was performed to reveal potential markers of response to treatment in vaccinated calves compared to non-vaccinated calves at each sampling day. Robustness of final OPLS-DA discriminative models was assessed by setting a predictive model of each case in which 2/3 of the data (known treatment) was used to predict the remaining 1/3 (unknown treatment).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolite Profiling of Roasted Pods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were performed with the program SIMCA-P Version 13.0 (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden). Markers were subsequently identified by analyzing the S-plot, which was declared with covariance (p) and correlation (pcor). All variables were mean centered and scaled to Pareto variance. The PCA was run for obtaining a general overview of the variance of metabolites, and OPLS-DA was performed to identify markers for distinguishing roasted and unroasted pods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multivariate Analysis of PC Decoction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCA, HCA, and FA for dimensionality reduction were applied to further explore the differences between different specifications of PC decoction pieces [5 (link)]. PCA was conducted using the software SIMCA-P Version 13.0 (Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden). HCA, one-way ANOVA and FA were performed by IBM SPSS Statistics 21.0 software (IBM, USA). Statistical differences in quantitative determination among the various specifications were assessed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD multiple comparisons when the variance was homogeneous; Welch test followed by Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons was conducted when the variance was hetero-homogeneous. A p-value no greater than 0.05 was considered as a significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Metabolic Profiling of Pakchoi Cultivars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The relative data acquired from polar metabolites profiling were subjected to orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA; SIMCA-P version 13.0; Umetrics, Umeå, Sweden) to inspect which components separated between green and purple pakchoi samples [33 (link)]. The OPLS-DA output consisted of score plots for visualizing the contrast between different samples and loading plots to explain the cluster separation. The data file was scaled with unit variance scaling before all the variables were subjected to OPLS-DA. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS statistics 22 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) using Student’s t test. All data are given as the mean values and standard deviation of triplicate experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!