The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dnase 1

Manufactured by Promega
Sourced in United States, China, Japan, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Australia, Switzerland

DNase I is an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolytic cleavage of DNA. It is commonly used in molecular biology applications to remove DNA from samples, such as during RNA purification.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

949 protocols using dnase 1

1

Macrophage-Mediated NET Degradation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages at 1×104 cells were added to wells containing NETs generated as described above, polarized, and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere. RPMI 1640 only and DNase 1 (4 mU/mL, Promega) in RPMI 1640 were added as negative (NETs only) and positive controls (DNase 1). Total NET amount per well was quantified at given time points by acquiring fluorescent images with the TissueFAXS microscope (TissueGnostics) using a 2.5x Zeiss air objective and NET area in each individual well was calculated using FIJI image analysis software.29 (link) Relative NET amount compared with time point 0 was calculated for each well and time point. The relative amount of each well at each time point was then normalized towards the relative NET amount of the NETs only control. As indicated in the respective NET degradation experiments, macrophages were treated with 1 µg/mL cytochalasin D (Abcam), 10 mmol/L ammonium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 µmol/L imipramine hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich), or 5 mmol/L EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich), respectively. All NET degradation experiments, except the ones testing imipramine or supernatants, were performed simultaneously to rule out interindividual variance in degradation kinetics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DNase I Optimization for Whole Genome Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNase I treatment of cells was performed as previously described [8 (link)] with minor modifications. 1×106 S2 cells were permeabilized with 0.05% NP40 and resuspended in DNase I Buffer (40 mM Tris–HCl, 0.4 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mg/ml BSA). Part of each sample was set aside and later used as non-digested control. DNase I (Promega) digestion was performed at 37°C for 10 or 15 minutes with diverse amounts of the enzyme to optimize the procedure (0.1U, 0.5U, 1U, 2U and 5U); for further analysis cells were treated with 0.5U DNase I for 10 minutes. 20 ng of DNA purified from the treated cells using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) were used as a template for whole genome amplification. The library preparation step using GenomePlex WGA2 Kit was followed by amplification with the GenomePlex WGA 3 Reamplification Kit (Sigma). dUTP was incorporated at the amplification step to enable the probe fragmentation procedure according to Affymetrix recommendations. The amplification product was purified with the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega), fragmented and labeled using the GeneChip WT Double-Stranded DNA Labeling Kit (Affymetrix), and hybridized with GeneChip Drosophila Tiling 2.0R Array following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

DNase I Footprinting of Bacterial Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNase I footprinting assay was performed by following a protocol developed by Wang et al. (2012 (link)). Briefly, the promoters of the arlR, ica, and pitR genes were cloned into a pUC18B-T vector (Shanghai Biotechnology Corporation, China), and the plasmids were used as the template for preparation of fluorescein amidite (FAM)-labeled probes with the primers M13F and M13R (both FAM-labeled). The FAM-labeled probes were purified using Wizard SV Gel and a PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Southampton, UK), and quantified using NanoDrop 2000C (Thermo Scientific). For the DNase I footprinting assay, 200 ng probes were incubated with different amounts of r-YycF in 40 μl of binding buffer at 30°C for 30 min. Subsequently, 10 μl DNase I (0.01 unit) (Promega, UK) and 100 nmol CaCl2 were added, incubated for 1 min at 25°C, and stopped using 140 μl DNase I stopping solution (200 mM unbuffered sodium acetate, 30 mM EDTA, and 0.15% SDS). The DNA samples extracted with phenol/chloroform and precipitated with ethanol, and the pellets were dissolved in 35 μl MilliQ water. The samples were loaded onto a device to carry out capillary electrophoresis, and data were collected using the GeneScan-500 LIZ dye Size Standard (Applied Biosystems, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of LhgR-DNA Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNase I footprinting assays were performed using the 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) labeled probe and purified LhgR. The DNA fragment F1 was PCR amplified using the primer pair F1-F/F1-R. The PCR products were cloned into the pEASY-Blunt plasmid using pEASY-Blunt Cloning Kit (TransGen, China). The FAM-labeled probes were PCR amplified using the resulting plasmid and the primer pair M13F-FAM/M13R. Then, 350 ng probes were incubated with 2 μg purified LhgR in a total volume of 40 μL for 30 min at 30 °C. The DNase I digestion reaction was carried out by adding a total volume of 10 μL solution containing approximately 0.015 units of DNase I (Promega, USA) and 100 nmol CaCl2 and further incubating for 1 min at 37 °C, then stopped by adding a total volume of 140 μL stop solution containing 0.15% (wt/vol) SDS, 200 mM unbuffered sodium acetate, and 30 mM EDTA. The digested DNA fragments were first extracted with phenol-chloroform, then precipitated with ethanol and resuspended in 30 μL MiliQ water. The binding region of LhgR to DNA fragment F2 was analyzed using the same procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from indicated cells with Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Plus (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and treated with DNaseI (Promega). cDNA was generated from 1 μg DNaseI-treated RNA (Reverse Transcription System, Promega). followed by qPCR amplification. The relative expression levels of gene expression were determined by using GAPDH mRNA levels as an endogenous reference, and the ΔΔCt method was used for normalization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNase I Footprinting of desAB Promoters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNase I footprinting assay was performed following the method described previously with minor modifications [59 (link)]. Briefly, the promoter regions of desAB in D. oryzae EC1 and B. cenocepacia H111 were amplified using the primer pairs Probe-PdesAB-F/Probe-PdesAB-R and Probe-PdesB25416-F/Probe-PdesB25416-R modified with FAM (Probe-PdesAB-F and Probe-PdesB25416-F) and HEX (Probe-PdesAB-R and Probe-PdesB25416-R) at their 5′-end to generate DNA probes. In the binding process, about 400 ng purified DNA probes were incubated with 1 μM tag-free DzrR or DzrR25416 at 25 °C for 30 min in a 40 μl binding reaction solution as described in EMSA assay. After the incubation, an aliquot of 10 μl solution with 0.03 units of DNase I (Promega, USA) was added. The samples were incubated for 1 min, and the reaction was stopped by adding the DNase I stop solution supplied by the RQ1 RNase-Free DNase kit (Promega, USA). Total DNA was purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and dissolved in 10 μl ddH2O after ethanol precipitation. DNA samples were run on 3730XL system and the data were analyzed by Peak Scanner 2 (Applied Biosystems, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DNase I Footprinting Assay for Promoter Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were performed as previously described [35 (link)]. Essentially, the binding reactions were incubated at room temperature for 30 min before digestion in a total reaction volume of 100 μl with 0.2 units of DNaseI (Promega), 5 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MgCl2, and 1 μg ml-1 salmon sperm at 37°C for 25 s. The DNaseI digestion reaction was stopped by adding 700 μl of stop solution (649 μl of absolute ethanol, 50 μl of 3 M sodium acetate, and 1 μl of 1 mg ml-1 yeast tRNA). The digested DNA products were harvested and resuspended in Milli-Q water and the DNA fragments were analyzed on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel in 1x TBE buffer. A sequence ladder was generated by using an fmol DNA sequencing system (Promega). The promoter fragments were prepared by PCR amplification using 32P end-labeled forward primer and unlabeled reverse primer (BT3612 [5’GAAGATTTCGCCGGAGTCAA3’] and BT3613 [5’GCGTTCGGAGATATCCGGCCAG3’] for PiscR, BT2879 [5’AACCGCTACGAGAACCTC3’] and BT3291 [5’CGAGACGAAGAGGTCGTT3’] for PnfuA, and BT7215 [5’GACCCGGGAGTATTTCGCCA3’] and BT3590 [5’GCCTTTCTGCGGGAGCT3’] for Ptpx) and each promoter fragment as DNA template. The sequence ladder was generated using DNA promoter fragment as template.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNase I Footprinting Assay for DNA-Protein Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNase I footprinting assay was performed as previously described (Xu et al., 2019a (link)). To precisely determine the DNA binding site of SACE_0303, 100 ng FAM/HEX-labeled P0303–0304 was successively incubated with 0, 70, and 490 nM His6-SACE_0303 in a total 50 μL of binding buffer at 20°C for 20 min, and then 2 μL DNase I (1 U/μg; Promega) was performed at 20°C for 30 s, 10 μL DNase I stop solution was added to the mixture and reacted at 65°C for 10 min. The ethanol precipitation method was used to purify and recover DNA samples. Purified DNA was sequenced with a 3730XL DNA genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems), and GeneMarker software program v2.2 for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Plasmid Copy Number Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were washed with PBS, resuspended in 400ul hypotonic lysis buffer (10mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 10mM NaCl, 2.5mM MgCl2), and incubated on ice for 15 minutes. After that, cells were lysed by adding NP-40 to a final concentration of 0.6% and nuclei were pelleted in a microcentrifuge at 7000 rpm at 4°C. After two washes, the nuclei were treated with 4–6 units DNaseI (Promega) in 200 μl DNaseI digestion buffer at room temperature for 30 minutes. After two more washes to remove DNaseI, total DNA were extracted using Quick-DNA Microprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research) following manufacturer’s protocol. Plasmid copy numbers were estimated by qPCR of bait (primers GGTCAGGATCTGCTGTCTAG and CCTGATGATCAAACGGACAG) and GAPDH from total DNA by comparing values to purified bait plasmid and cloned GAPDH standard curves, calculating plasmid copies per diploid genome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Gene Expression in Hypoxia-Stressed Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA (2 μg) was extracted from the roots of 18~20 plants exposed to low oxygen for 0, 1, 3, 8, 24, or 72 h. Residual DNA was removed by treatment with DNase I (1U/ mg RNA)(Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for 30 min at 37 °C, and then DNase I was inactivated by incubation for 5 min at 72 °C. The RNAs were reverse-transcribed with Superscript®II Reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The target cDNA was PCR-amplified in a 20 μL reaction volume containing 2 μL of 10× PCR buffer, 25 mM of each dNTP, 1 μL of cDNA, and one unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Takara, Shiga, Japan), plus 8 pmol of the appropriate primer sets (see Supplementary Table S5) in 25 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. The amplified PCR products of the target gene were evaluated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis in TBE buffer stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was repeated with three different biological samples and the representative results were presented. Gene expression level of RT-PCR result was measured from signal intensities on photograph of an agarose gel and normalized using by an internal control such as TUB2 and Actin2. The Pearson correlation coefficients (R2) were calculated between the expression level of target genes in RT-PCR and microarray data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!