The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using flucytosine

1

Antifungal Susceptibility of C. africana Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All C. africana isolates obtained herein were tested for in vitro susceptibility to amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), caspofungin (Merck & Co., Inc.), and micafungin (Astellas Pharma) by using broth microdilution method as described in CLSI document M27-A3 and M27-S4. The MIC values were read following 24 h of incubation and determined visually as the lowest concentration in which prominent decrease in turbidity was observed excepting for amphotericin B which is defined as the lowest concentration in which the absence of turbidity is observed. The recently revised CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) values for C. albicans were used as reference [28 (link)]. Quality control was performed as recommended in CLSI documents using C. parapsilosis ATCC22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Screening Yeast Mutants for Flucytosine Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To screen the Euroscarf single-deletion mutant collection for differential susceptibility towards inhibitory concentrations of flucytosine (Sigma), ranging from 0.02 to 0.09 mg/L, the different strains were prepared as described elsewhere [17 (link)]. Using a 96-pin replica platter, these cell suspensions were spotted onto the surface of MMB solid medium, supplemented with the amino acid concentrations mentioned above, and supplemented or not with flucytosine. Susceptibility phenotypes were registered after 3–5 days of incubation at 30°C. At least two independent replicates were obtained for each set of mutants and results were, in representative cases, confirmed by spot assays. The eventual over- or under-representation of GO terms associated to our dataset, compared to the yeast genome, was determined using GOToolBox (http://genome.crg.es/GOToolBox/). Enrichment was considered for p-values below 0.01. Gene classification was further conducted according to their description in the Saccharomyces Genome Database (www.yeastgenome.org)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro susceptibilities against 11 antifungal drugs, including amphotericin B (Cayman Chemical, USA), anidulafungin (SelleckChem, USA), caspofungin (TargetMol, USA), micafungin (TargetMol), fluconazole (TargetMol), isavuconazole (TargetMol), itraconazole (TargetMol), posaconazole (Sigma-Aldrich), ravuconazole (Sigma-Aldrich), voriconazole (TargetMol) and flucytosine (Sigma-Aldrich), were determined by the microbroth dilution method according to the guidelines by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (test range: 0.0156–8 µg/mL for itraconazole and posaconazole; 0.0312–16 µg/mL for other drugs) [52 ] and our previous publication [53 (link)]. For echinocandins, minimum effective concentration (MEC) endpoints were recorded as the lowest drug concentrations in which abnormal, short and branched hyphal clusters were observed; whereas for the other antifungal agents, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) endpoints yielding no visible fungal growth by eyes were recorded. Strains Aspergillus flavus ATCC 204304 and CNM-CM-1813, Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC 204305, Candida albicans CNM-CL F8555, Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019T as well as Pichia kudriavzevii CNM-CL-3403 and NRRL Y-413 were used as quality controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro susceptibility tests by using the CLSI reference broth microdilution method were performed for all species isolates number less than 100 strains. C. albicans and C. glabrata were randomly selected for the test. Those include 1272 C. albicans strains (including 998 isolates from VVC and 274 from RVVC) and 267 C. glabrata strains(including 197 isolates from VVC and 70 from RVVC). The MIC of Candida for all agents was read following 24–48 h incubation. The antifungals used were amphotericin B (Sigma, USA), Anidulafungin(Selleckchem, USA), Butoconazole(Sigma, USA), Caspofungin(Sigma, USA), Clotrimazole(Sigma, USA), Fluconazole(Sigma, USA), Flucytosine(Sigma, USA), Itraconazole(Sigma, USA), Micafungin(Selleckchem),Miconazole(Sigma, USA), Nystatin (Amresco, USA), Terbinafine(Santa Cruz, USA),Terconazole(Sigma),and Voriconazole(Fluka, USA). Quality control was performed as recommended in CLSI documents M27-A3 and M60 by using ATCC 90028 which is a reference strain of C. albicans and all results of the control were within established ranges [20 , 21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Activity Screening by Resazurin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Test compounds were diluted in sterile 96-well microplates with the redox-sensitive dye resazurin [49 (link)]. For this purpose, 10 μL of the test extract concentration was added to each well together with 190 μL of bacteria inoculum (5 × 105 CFU/mL) or yeast inoculum (5 × 103 CFU/mL). Incubation time varied depending on the microorganism from 7 days at 27 °C (mold), 24 h at 37 °C (yeast), and 17 h at 37 °C (bacteria). After this time, 10 μL of resazurin at 50 μg/mL per well was added. After this incubation period (under the same temperature condition previously declared) and times ranging from two and one days for, respectively, A. fumigatus and C. albicans, and 15 and 45 min for, respectively, S. aureus and E. coli. Corresponding fluorescence signals were measured at λex = 550 nm and λem = 590 nm in a microplate reader (TECAN GENios, Germany). Microbial growth after treatment was compared to untreated-control wells (100% cell growth) and medium-control wells (0% cell growth). Doxycycline, flucytosine, and terbinafine (all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as a reference drugs. Mean IC50 values estimated using linear regression analysis are presented with the SD of replicates (n = 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document M27-A4 (CLSI M27-A4) broth microdilution protocol was used as a guideline for broth dilution method as an
assay for testing antifungal susceptibility of yeasts [ 19
]. Susceptibility of the isolates to fluconazole (Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, Mo), amphotericin B (Bristol-Myers SP, Dublin, Ireland), flucytosine (Sigma Chemical Co),
itraconazole (Janssen-Cilag, High Wycombe, UK), voriconazole (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY), and caspofungin (Merck Sharp &Dohme, Whitehouse Station, NJ) were tested.
Stock and working concentrations of these drugs were prepared in 96-well microtiter plates based on the instructions stated by CLSI M27-A4 [ 19
]. A suspension equivalent to 0.5 McFarland was prepared from an overnight yeast culture on SDA by suspending the fungal cells in 10 mL of sterile distilled water,
and the concentration was spectrophotometrically adjusted according to CLSI M27-A4. Subsequently, 100 µL of fungal inocula were dispensed into wells of microplates,
and results were read after 24 h of incubation at 35 °C. Two quality control (QC) strains, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were also included.
In the current study, interpretation of results was based on the breakpoints established for Candida species in CLSI- document M27-A4 (19).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!