The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using fv10 asw viewer

1

Confocal Microscopy Analysis of LD and LDT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of LD and LDT by confocal microscopy, A549 cells were seeded in 8-well chamber slides (Labtek®, 20 × 104 cells per condition). The following day, cells were treated for the indicated times with LD or LDT. At the end of the treatment, slides were quickly washed with cold PBS and fixed in PFA 4% for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Next, cells were blocked with PBS 5% FCS, and then they were stained overnight with an anti-LAMP1 antibody (Cell Signaling). The following day, cells were washed and incubated with an Alexa 488 secondary antibody. Finally, cells were washed, and mounted onto drops of Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotech) containing DAPI. Fluorescence images were taken using a confocal microscopy (Olympus FV10i). Data was analyzed using a FV10-ASW Viewer, v3.1 (Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Renal Immunofluorescence Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen kidney sections were incubated with FITC-anti-IgG (Southern Biotech Birmingham) or FITC-anti-C3 (MP Biomedicals) and then mounted with Fluoromount/Plus (Diagnostic BioSystems). All samples were visualized using a FM1000D confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus), and images were captured and analyzed using the FV10-ASW viewer (Olympus). The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of FITC was calculated using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Confocal Microscopy Analysis of Gastric Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were examined with a confocal microscope using a 20× (numerical aperture, 0.95) XLUMPlanFl objective (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) in Fluoview (Olympus) at a resolution of 0.994 × 0.994 × 1.13 μm (X × Y × Z). Stacks of images across the full thickness of the muscles were collected from the documented electrical recording sites. To assess labeling across the whole stomach, tissues were examined with an Olympus IX70 microscope by 2 investigators blind to the tissue source. For quantification of the labeling specifically at the electrical recording sites, all of the confocal image stacks (120 images for each immunolabel) were flattened into projections using the FV10-ASW Viewer (Olympus), assigned a random number, and uploaded onto a digital album in random order. The images then were assessed using the same parameters as used for the whole tissue by 2 investigators blind to the tissue source. The images were scored on a 10-cm visual analogue scale for network density, connectivity, and structural preservation. The scores for each image then were averaged and the code was broken to find which image belonged to which field and animal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Confocal Microscopy Image Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent Images were obtained using a confocal laser scanning microscope (FV1000; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Quantification of cells or substances of interest was conducted on eight 500 μm x 500 μm fields of view per sample in scanned images, and numbers obtained from each of the eight fields were averages using an FV10-ASW Viewer (Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Visualizing Intracellular TLR7 Localization in pDCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary human pDCs were purified from PBMCs using Diamond Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Isolation Kit II (Miltenyi Biotec), and purity was always >90%. PDCs were treated with IFN-α for 2 h. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100, and then treated with Image-iT FX Signal Enhancer (ThermoFischer) for preventing nonspecific staining. Cells were stained with rabbit anti-TLR7 (polyclonal: Novus Biologicals), mouse anti-EEA1 (1G11: Abcam), mouse anti-Rab7 (Rab7-117: Abcam), rat anti-LAMP-1 (1D4B: Abcam) and goat anti-BDCA2 (polyclonal: R&D systems) as primary Abs and subsequently stained with AlexaFluor488-conjugated anti-rat IgG, AlexaFluor594-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG and AlexaFluor647-conjugated anti-goat IgG (all from Invitrogen) as secondary Abs. Cells were spun onto a microscope slide using the Shandon Cytospin 4 (ThermoFischer) and mounted with Fluoromount/Plus (Diagnostic Biosystems). All samples were visualized using FM10i confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus), and images were captured and analyzed using FV10-ASW viewer (Olympus). PDCs were identified as BDCA2 positive cells. Pearson's coefficient was calculated for analysis of the co-localization of TLR7 and endosomal markers (EEA1, Rab7, and LAMP1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Candida albicans Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C. albicans biofilms were developed on Thermanox (Nunc) 8 well plates under similar environmental conditions as described above. For three dimensional reconstruction of biofilm, live cells in biofilms were stained with SYTO9 and dead cells with propidium iodide (Invitrogen) for 15 min in dark as previously described38 (link). The biofilms were observed with an Olympus Fluoview FV1000 TIRF confocal microscope. Z-sections were collected. Images were analysed using Olympus FV10-ASW Viewer and Fiji software40 (link). Estimation of the biofilm biovolume was supported by bioImage_L developed by Chávez de41 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing lncRNA VIM-AS1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FISH assays were performed using a RiboTM lncRNA FISH probe Mix Kit (cat. no. c10910; Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Oligonucleotide modified Cy-3-labeled probes for VIM-AS1 (5′-TAG GAC TTC CTA GTA CTT CTG A-3), GAPDH and U6 were designed and synthesized by Genecreate. C4-2 cells were seeded on 20-mm confocal dishes (Corning, Inc). After overnight incubation, C4-2 cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at 4°C and permeabilized using Triton X-100 for 90 sec at 4°C. Next, 250 µl prehybridization solution with 1% blocking solution (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.) was added to C4-2 cells and cells were incubated at 42°C for 1 h. Subsequently, C4-2 cells were incubated with 100 µl hybridization buffer (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.) supplemented with 1% blocking solution and 2.5 µl 20 µM 22-nucleotide CY-3-labeled-VIM-AS1, CY-3-labeled-GAPDH or CY-3-labeled-U6 FISH probe at 37°C overnight in a dark moist chamber. The following day, cells were washed three times in 2X sodium citrate buffer for 5 min at 42°C and stained with DAPI at 4°C for 10 min. Images were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (FV1000; Olympus Corporation) and corresponding software (FV10-ASW Viewer; version 4.2; Olympus Corporation) at a magnification of ×400.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying CD103+ Lymphocyte Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate CD103+ cell density, we used the Vectra-InForm image analysis system (Perkin-Elmer/Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described previously 22 (link), 23 (link). For IHC, the five most representative high-power fields were captured at ×200 magnification (0.284 mm2 per field) for each tumor region in all specimens. CD103+ cells in each field were counted and analyzed manually by two independent observers blinded to clinical outcome. Positively stained cells with morphological features characteristic of lymphocytes were counted based on localization in the intratumoral (IT) and adjacent non-tumor (ANT) regions. Data are reported as the mean (± SEM) number of cells per field.
Immunofluorescence images were captured using a confocal microscope (Olympus, Essex, UK) and analyzed using a FV10-ASW Viewer (Olympus). Two independent observers blinded to the outcome counted and analyzed single- or double-positive cells in each of five representative fields at ×400 magnification (0.07 mm2 per field). Data are reported as the mean (± SEM) number of cells per field.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Macrophage Subsets by Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify CD204+ and CD169+ cell density, the Vectra-Inform image analysis system (Perkin-Elmer/Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used, as described in a previous study [28 (link), 30 (link)]. Target signals were quantified in selected tissues and cellular compartments of interest. The percentage of each immune cell subset was calculated by dividing the absolute number of each cell subset by area of the tissue surface.
Quantification methods for immunofluorescence were performed as previously described [30 (link)]. Immunofluorescence images were captured using a confocal microscope (Olympus, Essex, UK) and analyzed using FV10-ASW Viewer (Olympus, Essex, UK). The number of single-positive or double-positive cells in each of five representative fields at 400× magnification were counted. From these numbers, the proportions of CD204+ or CD169+ cells in CD68+ Mφs were calculated as: (number of CD204+CD68+ cells)/(number of CD68+ Mφs), or (number of CD169+CD68+ cells)/(number of CD68+ Mφs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Network Density of Interstitial Cells of Cajal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Labeled tissues were examined with a laser scanning confocal microscope using a 20× (NA 0.95) XLUMPlanFl objective (Olympus Japan) in Fluoview (Olympus Japan) using the optimal confocal aperture to give a resolution of 0.994 × 0.994 × 1.13 μm (X × Y × Z). Stacks of confocal images across the full thickness of the muscularis propria were collected from three nondiabetic Csf1op/op mice (20–22 weeks old), three diabetic Csf1op/op mice (20–22 weeks old), three nondiabetic Csf1+/+ mice (20–22 weeks old), and three diabetic Csf1+/+ with normal GE and 3 diabetic Csf1+/+ with delayed GE mice (2, 3, and 4.6 weeks after onset of diabetes). Six images from the gastric body and three from the antrum were taken for each animal. For quantification of the labeling, all of the confocal image stacks were flattened into projections using the FV10-ASW Viewer (Olympus). The flattened images were renumbered in random order and then assessed by scoring the integrity of the ICC on a 10-cm visual analogue scale for network density. Scoring was done in random order by two independent investigators blind to the image and tissue source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!